Posted on 11/08/2001 1:57:39 PM PST by Rebeckie
11/8/2001
202-646-5172
BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BLOCKS RENO DEPOSITION
Latest Obstruction Prevents Scheduled Testimony In Defamation Case Against Accused Spy Wen Ho Lee
Last Minute Gamesmanship No Better than Clinton Justice Department
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today criticized the Ashcroft Justice Department for obstructing a long scheduled deposition of former Attorney General Reno in whistleblower Notra Trulock defamation case against accused Chinese spy and admitted felon Wen Ho Lee. Trulock, the former chief of the Energy Department intelligence operations, is suing Lee and others for falsely accusing Trulock of racial bias while conducting an inquiry into the loss of America nuclear secrets from Energy Department labs. Former Attorney General Reno, who was subpoenaed last month, was expected to testify that Wen Ho Lee charges of racial bias had no basis in fact and that there was a legitimate basis to investigate Lee. The deposition of Ms. Reno was scheduled to take place tomorrow in Miami. Judicial Watch is representing Mr. Trulock in this matter.
Late yesterday afternoon, the Ashcroft Justice Department, through a fax from Assistant Attorney General Robert D. McCallum, Jr., unilaterally decided that Reno (and other witnesses such as former FBI Director Louis Freeh) would not appear as scheduled. Judicial Watch was told by a Justice Department lawyer that this decision was only made yesterday. (The Ashcroft Justice Department had known that Reno would be testifying in this case since June of this year.)
The Justice Department lawyers know they have no legal basis to prevent Ms. Reno from testifying at the last minute. Yet they think they are above the law and are contemptuous of the Court processes. The Ashcroft Justice Department has continually obstructed this case. Indeed, a federal court has already sanctioned them for similar conduct in this case. "Truth be told, in matters that Judicial Watch has been litigating, the ethics and practices of the Ashcroft Justice Department are no better than those of Reno Justice Department", stated Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman.
"No one is above the law. And Judicial Watch will seek appropriate sanctions and plans to ask for an independent investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the way the Wen Ho Lee case has been handled. These repeated obstructionist tactics by this Justice Department are most likely to cover up their ongoing negligence concerning the loss of virtually all of our nation nuclear secrets to China and other nations adverse to the United States", added Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
That was Cheney in his nominating convention speech, not W. It was also specifically directed at the men and women of our armed forces. It was brilliantly spoken too.
This article is about CANCELING a deposition; I am a court reporter; believe me, depositions get canceled ALL the time, every single day. Cases like this take YEARS. I myself have almost ended an estate case that took THREE YEARS to settle and we agreed on everything.
Stop pretending this is some kind of conspiracy. It's THE LAW. (Of course, since Larry doesn't actually GO to court, he may not know that.)
So what happened to the FBI files??? They still in the White House??? Maybe clinton passed them on to Bush!?!...
That's just one of those little 'inside jokes' said with a Smirk.
Gawd, don't give him any ideas!
Oh. So is this NOW the GOP's (and your) excuse for ignoring credible evidence of TREASON, BRIBERY, BLACKMAIL, ELECTION TAMPERING, CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS, MURDER, MASS MURDER and COUNTLESS OTHER CRIMES by the democRATS these last 8-9 years? Sorry ... it does not fly. If Bush and the GOP ignore these crimes by democRATS then we should NOT trust them either.
You say Klayman is in it for the money. What about Bush? What's his reason for ignoring such serious matters as TREASON and MASS MURDER? Is it JUST to get "reelected" ... for the good of his "party"? Would that make him any less of a "whore" than you appear to think Klayman is? Or less of one then Clinton ... since maintaining power was his motivation for committing all those crimes?
I just hate this NEW Republican "move on" mentality. It is MORE of a threat to our freedom and our nation's security than terrorists will EVER be.
Clue: That case NEVER went to trial; Sidney flinched. It was a bogus suit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.