Skip to comments.
BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BLOCKS RENO DEPOSITION
Judicial Watch Press Release ^
| 11/8/01
Posted on 11/08/2001 1:57:39 PM PST by Rebeckie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 341-357 next last
To: MoDeadTaliWhackers
Arator!!!!!!! I had NOOOOOOO idea you were a Larry Lakey!!!!!!! my oh my oh my!!!!!!!!! How goes things over at FRU's Reunion??? I stop by from time to time to see how you are doing....last time I was there I coulda sworn I saw you swearing off FR once and for all.
121
posted on
11/08/2001 3:28:42 PM PST
by
Neets
To: MoDeadTaliWhackers
Denial is so fun to watch.Thanks for the tip; I'll keep an eye on your posts.
122
posted on
11/08/2001 3:29:45 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin; Rebeckie
......If Larry truly wanted to just be on TV, .......
beckie, didn't you get the marching orders to contact Mr. Ailes?.....
URGENT CALL TO ACTION!
Dear Friend and/or Supporter
I hope you saw our call to action last week asking you to contact Roger Ailes concerning Fox News' failure to sufficiently cover Judicial Watch's activities.
123
posted on
11/08/2001 3:29:49 PM PST
by
deport
To: sinkspur
You just can't get any traction on Ron Brown, so, like a broken record, you drone on and on about murder and treason, only you capitalize everything. And you RUN from the facts like democRATS ALWAYS do. So either you are a democRAT or you are a new breed of Republican that is going to be virtually indistinguishable for democRATS when it comes to upholding the law. If you want to debate the facts in the death of Ron Brown, I'd be happy too. But it is hard to debate with someone who keeps RUNNING from ANY discussion involving Brown.
Bush was elected to do what he is doing now. If you would rather divert the attention of the Justice Department to chasing Clinton rather than terrorism, try to sell that to the American public.
EXCUSES EXCUSES EXCUSES.
The Bush administration had EIGHT MONTHS to do something. They did NOTHING and you can't prove otherwise. I dare you to provide ANY indication that they investigated ANY of the major crimes committed by the democRATS in those 8 months (and don't mention pardonGate since that was FOX NEWS driven and we STILL see NO RESULTS). Furthermore, I don't buy the excuse that because we are at war with a few thousand terrorists we can't uphold our own laws, especially when it comes to MASS MURDER and TREASON. If that is the case then we have already LOST the war. And you can't tell me that out of the TENS OF THOUSANDS of DOJ and FBI personnel available, Bush/Ashcroft can't spare a few hundred to exhume and autopsy Brown's body, and PROPERLY investigate Filegate, Chinagate and all the other NATIONAL SECURITY RELATED crimes of the democRATS. Afterall, they are have the resources to go after voter affirmed Assisted Suicide and voter affirmed Medical Marijuana. NO EXCUSES.
To: Rebeckie
The sad thing is Bush and Ashcroft are becoming accessary to the criminal cartel of Clinton and Reno. You can just move on so far before the stench catches up with you.
125
posted on
11/08/2001 3:34:57 PM PST
by
IW
Comment #126 Removed by Moderator
To: terilyn
Any investigation of Clinton et al is going absolutely nowhere. I tell you what. Exhume and autopsy Ron Brown's body THEN try to tell us that.
To: Diogenesis
Well I would say he is to blame for the corruption right now, I sure don't have to wait. All his speeches are laced every 30 seconds with the words "Evil and Justice"... what a joke.....This administration in my eyes is no different then Clinton/Reno!! How sad
To: Rebeckie
beckie, in case you missed this one...... send more money fast......
Important Notice From Larry Klayman
Dear Judicial Watch Supporter and Friend:
This is to advise you that Judicial Watch has rerouted its mail through "safe" post offices. Accordingly, you may continue to mail us contributions, letter, and other materials.
In fact, since our cost of operations are now higher because of the mail crisis, your continued financial and other support is very much appreciated.
God Bless and thank you,
Larry Klayman
Chairman and General Counsel
Judicial Watch, Inc.
###
129
posted on
11/08/2001 3:38:20 PM PST
by
deport
To: JoeEveryman
I'm not denying that he is in THIS case for money. Now prove to me that Bush isn't IGNORING CRIMES ... for the money.
To: BeAChooser
The Bush administration had EIGHT MONTHS to do something. Bush did not run to prosecute Clinton. He never mentioned it, not once, in his campaign.
He never promised BeAChooser that, in the first months of his presidency, he would regurgitate the last eight years.
Bush is smart and is doing the right thing.
You'd better get over your obsession with Clinton. Most of the rest of us have.
To: Rebeckie
I thought he said (Help is on the way) that to the military.
To: Howlin
and the others were right? Well then you should have no trouble proving that all the other cases are not still active in some way or another. And I'm STILL waiting for you to provide ANY proof that they were LAUGHED out of court ... which was your original LIE.
And while you are at it, why not address the other questions I asked you in my last couple responses. Or will you continue to RUN from the facts like you ALWAYS seem to do.
Comment #134 Removed by Moderator
Comment #135 Removed by Moderator
Comment #136 Removed by Moderator
To: MoDeadTaliWhackers
137
posted on
11/08/2001 3:47:33 PM PST
by
Don Joe
To: BeAChooser
Well then you should have no trouble proving that all the other cases are not still active in some way or another. It's pretty hard to do when you can't rely on the "facts" on Klayman's own web site.
But since you know it all, why don't YOU tell us which ones have been DISMISSED and which ones haven't.
138
posted on
11/08/2001 3:47:34 PM PST
by
Howlin
Comment #139 Removed by Moderator
To: Howlin
Here's a couple I ran across the other day...... but I'm sure there are more....
cases dismissed
.
- Hall v. Clinton, ED VA: Filed 5/17/99, dismissed 12/10/99 (dismissal affirmed by the 4th Circuit, 235 F.3d 202)
- Hall v. Clinton, DC: Filed 12/13/99, dismissed with prejudice 3/28/01
- Broaddrick v. EOP, DC: Filed 12/20/99, dismissed 3/28/01
- Flowers v. EOP, DC: Filed 12/21/99, dismissed 3/28/01
140
posted on
11/08/2001 3:54:02 PM PST
by
deport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 341-357 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson