[Howlin]

Well then you should have no trouble proving that all the other cases are not still active in some way or another.

It's pretty hard to do when you can't rely on the "facts" on Klayman's own web site.

But since you know it all, why don't YOU tell us which ones have been DISMISSED and which ones haven't.

[deport]

Here's a couple I ran across the other day...... but I'm sure there are more....

cases dismissed…….

• Hall v. Clinton, ED VA: Filed 5/17/99, dismissed 12/10/99 (dismissal affirmed by the 4th Circuit, 235 F.3d 202)
• Hall v. Clinton, DC: Filed 12/13/99, dismissed with prejudice 3/28/01
• Broaddrick v. EOP, DC: Filed 12/20/99, dismissed 3/28/01
• Flowers v. EOP, DC: Filed 12/21/99, dismissed 3/28/01

[BeAChooser]

But since you know it all, why don't YOU tell us which ones have been DISMISSED and which ones haven't.

No, Howlin. You are the one making the accusation that nearly all of Klayman's cases were "laughed out of court". PROVE IT.

And while you are at it, try to answer ANY of the other questions I've asked you during this discussion. Or are you going to continue to make UNFOUNDED ACCUSATIONS and RUN from the facts ... just like a democRAT would do?