Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MCSEs: We are all idiots
Myelabs.com ^ | 11/5/01 11:44:36 AM | Editorial Staff

Posted on 11/06/2001 7:11:47 PM PST by Justa

MCSEs: We are all idiots
Date:11/5/01 11:44:36 AM

As we watch our economy slide effortlessly down the road to a solid recession

Introduction:

    As we watch our economy slide effortlessly down the road to a solid recession, the IT and airline industries are fiercely competing for the coveted 'most jobs cut' award.  As a response to this and to last year's enormous .com bust, technical institutes, universities, community colleges and seminars that made it their mission, starting a few years ago, to quickly and efficiently pour additional 'qualified' people into the then undermanned  and rapidly expanding IT workforce have come to the realization that it is time to slow their efforts and look for alternative courses and programs to pursue.  Right?  Not one bit.  I wouldn't go as far as to say that the opposite is happening, but let's put it this way, if you haven't seen an ITT Technical Institute commercial in recent weeks praising the value and quality of their networking and other IT courses and assuring the promise of a bright future for those who join these programs, you don't have TV.

    One of the largest issues negatively affecting the health of the today's IT industry is the continued pursuit of failed, and increasingly meaningless certification programs, the most dangerous one of all being Microsoft's MCSE certification.  And since there are too many IT certifications out there to spend time evaluating the true value of each one, let's focus on Microsoft's popular MCSE (Microsoft Certified System Engineer) certification since it has in fact managed to process over 400,000 people into MCSE in the last few years.  For those who are not familiar with this program, it is in short a certification obtained by passing 6 or 7 exams related to computer networking using Microsoft's popular Windows NT or Windows 2000 operating systems and is aimed to enable MCSEs to design, install, support and troubleshoot information systems based on Microsoft Corp. software.  There are no other requirements besides passing the exams, no college level credits required, no proof of class attendance. 

    Just to remove the element of surprise, I intend, in the following article to do my best to expose the misinformation and straight lies that keep the MCSE certification process from being remodeled into an efficient program that could truly benefit the IT industry and its customers instead of making a mockery out of both.  How can I be so cruel as to attempt to dash the hopes of those poor souls who are currently on page 3 of their networking essentials book?  Well, there's an MCSE 'diploma' with my name on it at home, somewhere, and the only thing I really feel certified as is an idiot for having wasted the money to acquire it.    

Background:

    Certifications are not a new concept, they have been around in fields such the automotive industry for many years, but the IT certifications rose to fame very quickly 4 or 5 years ago when the industry was in dire need of a large and immediate input of 'qualified' employees and did not have the patience or possibility of waiting for those working on 4-year degrees to fill the various positions that were opening at an alarming rate in the technology field.  The certification process therefore enabled the industry to expect a large supply of potential employees who learned their skills in a matter of a few months or less instead of the years it took for college grads to enter the market.  Besides the benefit of a quickly trained supply of fresh employees, new certifications could also be quickly created and existing ones modified according to the latest industry developments something which is just not possible with standard 4 year college curriculums.  As a result, those who sought there certifications were thought to be more up to speed on the very latest technologies as opposed to college grads who started their computer education with basic and largely archaic skills and worked their way up to more modern technologies, building a much deeper understanding and greater knowledge along the way.  As far as those who were already employed in the industry are concerned, certifications were a relatively easy way for their employers to encourage them to learn new skills to keep up with ever changing technologies and be presented with proof that the classes they provided their employees with were taken seriously enough for them to pass the exams.

How popular are Microsoft's various certifications?

Microsoft Certified Technical Education Centers are spreading at an alarming rate.
If you're thinking about taking your MCSE certification course in Namibia but are worried that because your country's population size barely exceeds that of Detroit's you might not find a Microsoft Certified school or testing center, don't worry, you'll find your local Microsoft Certified academy's contact information on the right. 

Information Technology Learning Academy
Windhoek, Namibia  NAM
(61) 223-763

Testing Center:
INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
79 HOSEA KUTAKO DRIVE
WINDHOEK, 
264 61 253 141

The current situation:

A little over a year ago, I picked up a book entitled "SQL in 10 Minutes" (published by SAMS in 2000), you could read it over and over again for a solid decade and not know SQL at all, but it's good for a couple of laughs here and there.  For those of you who don't know what SQL is, the title of this book is equivalent to something on the order of  "How to landscape your yard if you don't have one".  Unfortunately, the title of this book reflects to a large degree the much abused sense of urgency that has rendered programs like the MCSE certification simply incapable of truly assuring employers and employees alike that they have indeed learned the skill sets supposedly required to pass the exams, the rush to get it done simply does not push students to learn any more than they must to pass the exams.

But how much did the industry as a whole suffer from this massive input of low quality labor?

I'm not sure whether Microsoft and all of the other companies who benefit from the MCSE program and desperately want to keep it going realize it or not, but they are actually doing a great disservice to not only those who wish to work in the IT industry and those who already do but also to the businesses that hire these people.  How did this certification frenzy hurt the industry you ask?  Well, an impressive number of people whose extensive hands on computing experience allowed them not much more than to easily dominate their friends in Quake, were hired to participate in overseeing corporate networks after completing their MCSE certifications in a few weeks.  The biggest backlash of this is a widespread lack of proper security planning and implementation over much of the internet:

"IT professionals and trainers are blaming insufficient security training offered under the nationwide Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer program for contributing to the spread of "Code Red" and other damaging viruses."
Dan Verton, CNN, August 14, 2001

The biggest mistake made by both those who relied on getting certified to find work and those who did the hiring was confusing the real meaning of the certification, being certified meant and still means that a person managed to pass some relatively simple exams, nothing more, it does not in any way assure a certain level of expertise or experience.

The result of this madness?

The number of unemployed MCSEs should soon rival with the number of the employed variety.  The number of expensive mistakes made by inexperienced, unknowledgeable and poorly trained MCSEs is unimaginable.  The cost in terms of lost productivity, data loss, and other damage resulting from these employees' mistakes will probably soon warrant its own heading on corporate balance sheets. 

The result of having over 400,000 MCSEs in the United States:
The following is a comparison of the number of job listings for the Los Angeles area and under different skill headings from computerjobs.com (10/02/01)
Heading: # of Jobs Listed:
MCSE 4
Java 38
Cobol 20
DB2 18
Some additional cheery numbers:
Searches for the keyword MCSE in the employment sections of various newspapers and online job listing sites for the San Diego/LA area on 10/02/01:
Source: # of hits:
Union Tribune (San Diego's main publication) 2
Monster.com 3
Dice.com 2
Hotjobs.com 2
The lack of new positions for MCSEs as compared to those knowledgeable in both current technologies such as Java and even legacy technologies such as Cobol or DB2 goes a long way to show that the not only is the MCSE not all that impressive, but also that nearly half a million MCSEs must be plenty enough.
And back for more certifications we go...
MCSE / MCSE+I CCNA or higher Frame Relay / ATM knowledge (DLCI, PVC structures and designs) AMI-D4/B8ZS-esF Channelized / Non-Channelized knowledge Sniffer / Radcom LAN/WAN / VoIP Analyzers HP Open View / Cisco Works / Cajun View / NetIQ Chariot IP-Based

(Computerjobs.com) List of required skills for a recently advertised $40K/yr position.

What keeps the failed and overcrowded MCSE certification program going?:

How can a program so heavily flawed, so void of real value, and so expensive survive?

While unemployment in the IT sector grows faster than we can keep track of it, while ineffective certification programs, such as the MCSE cert., are increasingly being recognized for what they really are and as companies are starting to realize the losses they suffer from hiring poorly trained certification-brandishing applicants, MCSE classes are packed.

Much of the reason for this is the incredible volume of propaganda that surrounds this program and others like it, all parties involved that stand to profit from the continuation of this madness keep applying pressure to avoid serious interruptions to the certification frenzy.  

Microsoft and co.:

It is certain that Microsoft uses their many certification programs as tools to lock customers into its specific products and platforms, this is also true of Novell, Oracle and Cisco of course.  This effect comes directly into play when companies seeking to upgrade existing servers and workstations or to add new systems, ask for their IT staff's advice as to operating system and other hardware choices, most employees undoubtedly select whatever platform they are either familiar with or certified to manage.

Is Microsoft responding to the current lack of opportunity in the IT industry since its certifications and the rush to qualify a staggering number of people significantly contributed to the problem? 
And is Microsoft making the required changes to prevent people who are not qualified, not experienced or who have simply not bothered to study from passing the exams and receiving their certifications anyway?
No.  There seems to be no move to try and limit the number of centers Microsoft certifies to teach these classes, and there seems to be no intention on Microsoft's part to either expand on the requirements for receiving the certification or to increase the difficulty and change the format of the tests themselves. 

A short-lived sense of relief came over me when I noticed that Microsoft had added yet another certification to their repertoire, the MCSA, which might have refuted everything I've just said if it were a much more intensive and demanding revision of the MCSE certification as it might have resulted in a reasonable number of better trained and qualified people filling the positions that still exist in this IT mess, but in fact, it's quite the opposite, a less demanding program with fewer exams and therefore a greater output of half-qualified and largely inexperienced future job seekers... a fantastic idea.

Testing centers:

Testing centers, which have been established in locations ranging from technical schools to flight schools (114 centers in California), stand to lose a considerable steady source of income if the continuous flow of certification seekers somehow diminished.  The majority of the 400,000+ MCSEs out there have spent $100 on each of the 6 or 7 exams required to obtain their certification, that translates into a total of  over $240 million which does not take into account the other 100s of thousands of people who took tests to accomplish certifications such as MCP, CCNA, MCSD, CNE, CNA...

Exam prep. material, Transcender is smiling from ear to ear. 

A DVD-ROM might have the capacity to hold the list of publications which include the word "MCSE" in their titles.  But we'll leave publishers alone after having simply said that there are hundreds if not thousands of books published with the only and specific purpose of preparing students to pass the MCSE exams, and the number of copies sold must be quite impressive indeed.

Let's instead focus on an interesting and fortunate company in the exam prep. area, the Transcender Corporation.
Transcender pretty much has a monopoly on the practice test (or mock exam) industry when it comes to many certifications, including the MCSE.  The practice tests provided are shockingly similar to the actual tests, right down to the format and questions themselves, and cost between $99 and $198 each with most costing $149.  The popularity of these practice tests is quite impressive, and because students realize that they are extremely effective, Transcender stands to potentially pocket around $800 to $900 from each student.
The downside for employers and employees alike is that someone who spends enough time (a few days) practicing these tests in order to pretty much memorize the questions and answers, will more than likely pass the actual exam whether he or she has bothered to open a book or has any skills or knowledge on the topic at all.  
Whether the fact that so many unqualified people manage to obtain their certifications in this manner should be blamed on Transcender, Microsoft or anyone at all, the result is the same, the MCSE certification loses much of its value in the eyes of both employers and those certified, as it should.

Online job listing services:

Job listing sites rely not only on job postings (the volume of which has tremendously diminished) for their income, but also on job seekers' visits in order to justify their banner prices to advertisers.  Newly certified and inexperienced applicants provide these sites with a healthy traffic volume and in response to the current size of the unemployed IT workers pool, Monster.com has recently launched an advertising campaign in order to draw some traffic to their site from the crowd of 'I can't believe I made a mistake this large' burger-flipping MCSEs out there.  These advertising campaigns, not only bring job seekers in for a visit, but also send the wrong message to those who are considering a move from their current industry to the IT sector by giving them the impression that these sites are just overflowing with opportunities, nothing could be further from the truth.

Job seekers:

Those who have taken and passed the exams required to receive their MCSE certification and who relied and still rely on it to open doors for them despite their utter lack of previous experience or even solid understanding of the topics they were tested on are quite happy with the way the MCSE requirements and exams are currently structured.  Many of them, along with the schools that taught them, frowned at Microsoft's attempt to discourage others from following in their footsteps by switching from straight forward multiple choice exams to an adaptive format that respond to correct answers by asking tougher questions and vice versa.  The simplicity of the exams, the ability to pass them by simply practicing on or memorizing mock tests, and the large demand for IT personnel up to about 2 years ago combined with the disproportionately high salaries enjoyed in the IT industry at that time made it all too attractive an offer to resist, even for those who weren't all that motivated by the industry as a whole.

Certified and non-certified training centers:

And then of course, there are the variety of technical education centers founded around nothing else but teaching classes aimed at helping students pass the exams required to obtain various certifications.  This very specialized industry racks in an impressive amount of money and the volume of misinformation they feed to their existing and prospective students would be amusing if it didn't rob so many of them out of their money to no avail.  Having taught over 400,000+ MCSEs alone in the last few years, this industry has grown at an alarming rate, between technical colleges, specialized training facilities, boot camp organizations and all the way up to state and private colleges and universities, the income derived from charging students or their employers between $2,000 and $10,000 each for MCSE certification classes translates into revenues in the $800 million to $4 billion range, and this over last 5 years at the most, since the fever began.  What is the standard response received by disillusioned recently certified students who have either not found work or not received any type of raise or promotion from their certification?  More certifications.  And although this eventually might lead to a skilled workforce of people who actually stick to it instead of calling it quits, it isn't for that reason that schools recommend this approach of accumulating a bag full of certifications.

The most alarming example of just how much money was flat out stolen from individuals and companies who fell victim to the MCSE disaster is the concept of the MCSE 'boot camp'.

MCSE boot camps: theft in its purest form.
The concept of the MCSE boot camp is just baffling.  For an employer or an individual to see some kind of value in learning what for many is a completely new skill or even a chance at a new career in 12 days is just disappointing.  The mere idea that you can obtain a supposedly difficult certification in that amount of time devalues it tremendously.
A couple of exams, a few long walks on the beach and $7000 later they send you home with your MCSE and a complimentary oatmeal cookie.
If you listen carefully at night, you can hear the boot camp 'graduates' or their employers pulling their hair out slowly to maximize the pain.
Excerpt from MCSEclasses.com:
"Learn your MCSE material at many vacation destinations throughout the country! MCSE Boot Camps and MCDBA Boot Camps run for 12 days (mornings-evenings with afternoons off in national parks and beaches so you can enjoy the day)!" Price: $6495, airfare and lodging included.
A few less and more expensive choices:
Company # Days Hotel
Incl.
 Price 
HOTT 15 YES  $4485 
Ameriteach 12 NO  $7495 
CED Solutions 14 YES  $6495 
Global Knowledge 14 NO  $8995 
Northwest Computer Training 13 YES  $6599 
The Training Camp 12 YES  $7495 
New Horizons 15 NO  $6375 

The training center industry has in fact grown so large, that it is now increasingly hiring a larger percentage of the people it itself has trained than most other industries!  ITT Technical Institute recently ran the ad below seeking to fill an instructor position, it was 1 out of a total of 4 ads under the MCSE heading in the Los Angeles section of computerjobs.com.


CNS Instructor


Looking for a position that will give you the opportunity to enhance the lives of others? We truly believe that the future of our nation's workforce is being developed right here and are looking for people who would like to be part of the team building this future ... 

Required Skills:
3 years of exp. in systems administration, network architecture, GUI, NT, TCP/IP, Linux, LAN/WAN, or Novell and a bachelor's degree, we would like to hear from you. An MCSE, MCP, CNE, CCNA, CCNP, and/or CNA is desirable

ITT Technical Institute Torrance, CA Full Time 11/1/2001

Employers:

Probably most disappointing of all, is the fact that employers also fall victim to the certification hysteria, and those who know quite well how over glorified the program is are no exception.  Since the program's inception, companies who realized that it was often exploited by inexperienced applicants seeking to get in the door routinely tested these applicants through short oral or written quizzes to try and weed out the more obvious impostors, but even those who are convinced of the program's lack of real value are more than happy to advertise their staff's various certifications in order to secure business for themselves.  Just as nationwide automotive maintenance and repair chains regularly boast that all of their mechanics are ASE certified, so do large technical support and other IT consulting firms when it comes to their employees' MCSE and other certifications.  This fact forces companies in that sector, whether they believe in the certification process or see it for what it is, to send many of their employees to acquire these certifications in order to instill some false sense of confidence in their customers' minds.  This behavior gives the certification frenzy cycle some additional momentum, and manages to convince job seekers that there indeed is some real value to the MCSE program.

Conclusion:

Obtaining an MCSE certification does not have to be a meaningless endeavor, and there are those who go through the process for the explicit purpose of learning the material they need to be familiar with instead of simply trying to pass the exams as soon as possible.  In that sense, the MCSE certification can be a positive step forward for those who truly wish to have it be just that and who recognize that they will have to learn more on their own than that which is required to pass the exams.  However, you can't have a program be successful and meaningful and warrant the creation of a multi-billion dollar industry, if it results in the certification of people who may have actually made an effort to learn something and of others who just aimed at passing a handful of exams to get it behind them.  This is the basic flaw of the MCSE certification process, the ease with which it can be be taken advantage of by some diminishes its overall value and devalues the efforts of those who take the program seriously, this is why a complete restructuring of the program and of its requirements is not only a good idea, but is actually owed to those who wish to join it for the right reasons.

In the minds of many employers and MCSEs, the certification has become nothing short of a joke with the many parties profiting from it trying to keep the laughter down and therefore the backing needed to incite a thorough reexamination of the program in order to turn it into what is was originally supposed to be, and never was, simply isn't there.  After all, I too believe that the program was originally supposed to result in individuals being certified as people who have actually acquired some solid, thorough and meaningful knowledge of a particular product or service (in this case, Microsoft's Windows NT or 2000 based networking technologies).

The best possible way to get out of this mess is to discourage those who are not truly committed to learning the skills required to do the job they are supposed to be training for.  And the only way to do this is to rebuild the MCSE program from scratch, no part of its current format should survive this revision except for the original concept which I hope was based around correctly and meaningfully teaching the skills needed by those who desire to enter the IT industry's networking field and certifying their knowledge by requiring that they pass a series of rigorous examinations after having spent a required amount of class time, and having covered specific topics, in certified training centers and universities.

Instead of this restructuring, we seem to be rapidly heading for a situation where more total income will be generated by training, testing and advertising to MCSE certified and certification bound individuals than employers stand to profit from the hiring of these people as a whole, and as ridiculous and illogical as that may sound, the propaganda generated by the variety of individuals and companies that stand to gain from such a situation is loud enough to keep the silliness going for a while yet.

Is there any good news you ask?  Of course there is, the Silicon Valley housing shortage problem has improved considerably, and if you decide to move to the area I'm convinced that your realtor will throw in a couple of MCSEs to paint the place.

 
[Embedding used to support tables]


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: kd5cts
Yeah, I've heard that of Slackware but imo it remains insufficient as a nework client replacement for current Windows users. Companies run on employees so the computers have to be tailored to their knowledge base. Imo the 'best Linux distro' is what Shelly-down-in-accounts-receivable can operate.

The big issue I've run into talking with IT people in my area (including 3 MISs at mid-sized companies) is that their NT4 systems (inc. 98 clients) are a nightmare to operate now and they simply don't have the money for an NT5 system. Additionally, the MISs were horrified of the potential of having their databases on NT5's dynamic kernal and .Net. Another issue was the implications of the proposed changes to MS licensing next Feb. (mo' money, faster upgrading).

To be blunt, companies simply don't have this kind of money now and their NT4 systems are falling apart from security issues, malware and NT5's deployment. I had to explain to one MIS that the reason his company's software wouldn't run on a customer's new notebook was that it most likely was running 2000 or XP and they'd have to run the compatability patch/checker to see if the OS's HAL would accept their software. He said "oh, well we install our own .dlls with our software" so I had to delicately explain how NT5 deals with the installation of second-party NT4 .dlls.

From what I could tell every one of the MISs I spoke 'disliked' MS for what it was doing to their company. I.e., giving limited or no support to NT4, particularly with viruses. What's unfortuante about most IT professionals is they only know about running a computer, not a company.

21 posted on 11/06/2001 9:10:27 PM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Yes, MCSE's are definitely worth it. Why are there so few MCSE jobs available? Because we hired the MCSE's a long-time ago and they are still employed, there isn't a need to replace them. On the other hand, the LINUX/ORCL/SUNW crowd run through their engineers every few years (they hire/fire routinely).

So, if you're a new MCSE, all I got to say is... where were you 4 years ago when the cert. first started?

22 posted on 11/06/2001 9:11:46 PM PST by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Justa
IT for 20 years, screw it all, I'm opening a Harley custom shop. Sayonarra (phonetic sp so you geeks don't think I'm totally stupid (ego thang, donch'a know)) suckas!!!!!!
23 posted on 11/06/2001 9:12:14 PM PST by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth
Phonetic my ass!!!
24 posted on 11/06/2001 9:15:04 PM PST by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth
I got your spell checker right here!
25 posted on 11/06/2001 9:16:46 PM PST by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Justa
BTW KMA on your certifications. I've been doing fine with my skills.

Trouble is, billy boy forgot to include PEOPLE SKILLS in his little MCSE exams.

Been there, done that. BFD.

26 posted on 11/06/2001 9:19:33 PM PST by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justa
Thanks for the info Justa. My dear hubby has been an MSCE for about 4 years, and it is the best move he has made in his career. But there is a remarkable decrease in job opportunities out there for those credentials, and there really has been a massive influx of paper MSCE's in the last few years. CISCO may be the way to go.
27 posted on 11/06/2001 9:22:40 PM PST by Aura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justin Thyme
Thanks for the advice Justin. I'm doing pretty well in the job search now. My main area of interest is the Fed. I have 2 career fields to choose from: investigations/security based upon my military experience and computing based upon classes, certifications and 14 yr.s experience.

My long-term goal is to get into the Fed. then retire from a well-paid senior nework admin. job within an agency. There's some real choice picks out there, like 50K for network admin. of a few dozen computers on a federal military reservation in Umatilla, OR, overlooking the Columbia river with mountains and forests all around. Boating, hunting, fishing -drool.

Unfortunately, the Fed. doesn't appear to be accepting the 18 months network admin. work I did in 96-98 as it was an additional duty and isn't in my DD-214. So it looks like I may have to settle on investigations again to get back into the system. Joy.

The short-term networking work I'm looking at is to fulfill the 52-weeks experience requirement for federal hiring and since I'm rather frank (truthful) in the interviews I usually tell them this. And they start asking me if I'm going to "settle here" and what not. "Settle" on a $10/hr. job? Yeah, maybe in a camper shell. In one interview they asked me if I'd be willing to admin. their NT4 network and even though I'd run NT4 before and it's in my resume I told them "No, no way". I didn't learn 2000 to get stuck servicing a dying NT4 network. For $10/hr. I didn't need that kind of abuse. Heck, I'll do roofs first.

28 posted on 11/06/2001 9:48:59 PM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth
"Trouble is, billy boy forgot to include PEOPLE SKILLS in his little MCSE exams....Been there, done that. BFD."

Yeah, who would have guessed?

29 posted on 11/06/2001 10:00:49 PM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Aura
I've often run into the Cisco Academy folks where I take classes and also around 'in the field' since we're all eyeing employment. The thing about Cisco is there's diminshing jobs, even more than with MS. The internet has mostly been built-out in America and future buildouts will likely go at a much slower pace then what was seen in '96-2000. So for the future the existing CCNAs and CCNEs will likely be able to handle the load. There's also the wireless factor which reduces network wiring loads so there may even be a reduction in Cisco work if enough networks go wireless. I can't imagine cable going unutilized though.

If your husband has an MCSE job he should stick with his MCSE job. If anything, he should work on keeping his MS administrator skills current by working towards an MCSA.

In the end I'd advise he get away from MS networking and go to Unix/Linux. I think that within 10 yr.s MS-certified network administrators won't reside onsite @ $60K/yr. but via their keyboards in Calcutta @ $10/day. MS will of course charge something like $3.95/min. for 'Remote Administration Services'. This ability is already built into NT5 (2000/XP) and is likewise planned for .NET Enterprise Servers. When that happens likely the only techs needed onsite will be a couple of A+ hardware monkeys to service the .Net End User's equipment. With .Net MS is going to a closed network -like AOL. They won't need administrators onsite.

30 posted on 11/06/2001 10:47:59 PM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kd5cts
I shoulda used the < /sarcasm> tag. Sorry.

I wasn't sure if you were using sarcasm but did consider it a possibility. Not to worry, I posted the links to benefit everyone.

I don't care about certifications. I want to know what you really know about real situations that cost me money. Certifications were supposed to do that. They don't. I'll stick with my sit-'em-down and tell them to type

Agreed, I would much rather have a person who can do the job over someone with a piece of paper that's worthless...and not just in the computer industry.

rm -r /

and see how much they flinch. GRIN!

You're naughty!

31 posted on 11/06/2001 11:01:07 PM PST by Philip_the_evangelist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Justa
Right now I have A+, MCP2000 and Network+ and stil can't get a job locally in the field.

The tech job market in the DC area is still strong. A few certifications + clearances = $$$. Maybe the job market in Oklahoma will turn around when the economy picks up again - next spring? Best of luck job hunting.

32 posted on 11/07/2001 4:28:50 AM PST by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Justa
Certifications are merely another revenue stream for the vendor, and a time and money trap for those who seek them. We get kids in here all the time who own nice, fresh MCSE's but have no practical skills or problem solving abilities. Like someone else said, we already had system and network engineers on staff and we sent them for their MCSEs...made no difference in their output or work ethic and they knew most of the material anyway. A waste of money from the corporation's point of view.

That said, I will sign off;

Ol' Sox (MIS, MSCE (lapsed), CLP (lapsed), CNE (lapsed))

33 posted on 11/07/2001 5:30:26 AM PST by Ol' Sox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka
I have found that the ability to do SQL has really paid off in my consulting. I do some database work as part of ZillNet and it is a distinct advantage.

I give the same advice to go after database skill to anyone that asks, and they usually respond something along the lines that they are really more interested in some of the more exciting stuff (like the internet, etc...) People not real familiar with corporate information systems tend to go with the stuff they know about or see in the news. Databases don't make much news in the press.

When you think about it, a databse is at the core of most business applications. Take the forum we're on, FR. There isn't much doubt that most of the major functions of this site rely on a database. The OS it runs on may be Linux, but the heart of the system is the database. Almost any site on the internet that carries large amounts of info, be it a catalog, news articles, customer info, or search info is driven by a database.

Its been my experience that while different technologies come and go there is always a need for database people, and never enough of them. If your interested in some specific technology, learn how it ties in with databases.

Interested in the internet, learn about tying internet sites into a database backend.

Interested in Linux, learn about installing and maintianing database systems on Linux.

Interested in networking, learn about distributed database systems.

I know I sound like the guy in "The Graduate" who pushes plastics, but it has really been my experience that database skill are always in demand, and there is never enough of them to fill that demand.

34 posted on 11/07/2001 5:52:37 AM PST by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ikka
I got my MCSE certification in 1996. That was when it was split up between 4 required courses, and two electives, with about 5 electives to choose from. I chose IP, and Windows networking as my electives. I took NT Workstation, Server, Win 95, and WFW 3.11 (yes Win 3.11 was a required course as late as 96--go figure, huh?) which were required. I kept the test, and have gone back to it over the years, and so far I have run into maybe 3 things that were covered by the test, and perhaps 10 that was covered in the course material. In short, the certification that guarantees anyone that I know my stuff about MS Products did NOTHING to prepare me for real world scenarios. I can remember my first call as a MCSE was to set up a network printer on an NT 4.0 network. Didn't have a clue. The course material didn't even cover such a basic task as that. I figured it out on my own as I have with almost every other thing I have had to know. The course material was utterly useless. The only good thing I can say that I got out of being an MCSE is access to MS's tech net site, which has been quite useful over the years. Basically the certifications are what I feel is just another profit center for MS. Anyone competent in networking can figure out almost anything they need to know in NT, and it's even easier in Win 2K. Basically, if you think the certification will get you more money, do it, but don't do it for "personal enrichment", as I have learned that the courses are useless in an everyday environment.
35 posted on 11/07/2001 6:23:50 AM PST by Space Wrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Bump for thoughts or comments. Are MCSEs worth it?

I'm a 'Certified Java Programmer', and that certification has been very useful.

I think the actual point here is that developers who focus on Microsoft-only solutions are losing to cross-platform Java developers.

As he pointed out -- in the LA area if you want a job, your best bet is to know Java.

36 posted on 11/07/2001 6:31:35 AM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Space Wrangler
My son recently got his MCSE. I was amazed at how quickly and easily he passed the tests - studying the book a day or so before the test and finishing well before the time given. (Is it that easy or is he just that smart :) ?) I'm not aware of his taking any classes, he's 22 and has been working for 2 years in networking stuff (techinical term here) and setting up retail websites, etc. He's had very little formal education in computers, but seems to have a natural ability for it. I keep bugging him to get his degree. (He started working toward a Chemical Engineering degree and quit after 1-1/2 years.) Should he find it necessary to seek other employment, what type of computer languages/classes would any of you recommend that he have under his belt to make him most employable?
37 posted on 11/07/2001 6:52:20 AM PST by Clintons Are White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Justa
We have an MSCE who freaked that a NIC was broken because he couldn't ping the subnet mask. Yes, you did hear that correctly. That was a couple of months ago. Monday he sent me to replace another broken NIC, he had not bothered to ping the loopback. The wall jack had a loose pair.
38 posted on 11/07/2001 7:02:04 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justa; innocentbystander
Helpful article- thanks for posting it.

I can do a little bit of everything but am not certified. I've toyed with getting some sort of certification but have been unsure as to what to pursue. I've also considered getting some of the books and doing it on my own.

Do you (or anyone else) recommend some kind of Java certification? What would overall be the best kind of certification for someone who likes computers but not programming?

(IB I thought you'd be interested in this article)

39 posted on 11/07/2001 7:10:06 AM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justa
Oh, how quaint. They're basing their argument based on web statistics from a small number of online job listing agencies.

Phhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht!

40 posted on 11/07/2001 7:13:58 AM PST by Winged Elf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson