Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ignatz_q
Not to mention States' Rights.
10 posted on 11/06/2001 10:48:59 AM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Senator Pardek
Not to mention States' Rights.

Right!

11 posted on 11/06/2001 10:51:02 AM PST by ignatz_q
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Senator Pardek
Not to mention States' Rights.

Apparently Ashcroft can't read:

Amendment X: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Not only that, he forgot that 'conservatives' are supposed to be for state's rights. Oh yeah, I nearly forgot, that's only when it suits their own purposes.

13 posted on 11/06/2001 10:56:44 AM PST by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Senator Pardek
I think the relative part of the order relates to federally controlled substances. If the drugs used are not federally controlled then it shouldn't apply....As to whether there are any drugs that fall into the latter category, I personally don't know.

"The decision...would allow the revocation of drug licenses of doctors who participate in an assisted suicide using a federally controlled substance."

18 posted on 11/06/2001 11:20:51 AM PST by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson