Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: southernnorthcarolina
My experience differs. Since I stopped eating starches, I have lost twelve pounds. I also sleep better, no longer get heartburn, and have more energy. My cholesterol and other blood factors remain nominal.

I suspect that genetics is they key factor in weight gain. Some people thrive on Adkins-type high-protein diets due to their genetics; others need more carbohydrate. Protein and fat are my "natural" best foods; others, with different DNA, may have other dietary requirements.

There is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all healthy diet.The only safe way to determine one's proper diet is by working with one's doctor.

12 posted on 10/30/2001 8:38:58 AM PST by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: B-Chan
I'm not surprised that the pro- and anti-Atkins positions here are being vigorously defended. For some, on both sides of the issue, it's almost like a religion.

I have no doubt that genetics plays some role in weight gain, the way bodies assimilate food, and so forth. But I also think the "genetics" argument is grossly overemphasized, and often gives obese people a convenient excuse not to attack the problem. Most fat people, it has been my experience, blame their condition on heredity and genetics. Excuse me, but I say hogwash. Next time you're in a grocery store, find a really fat person, and take a discreet peek into his or her shopping cart. You'll usually see few (if any) fresh fruits and vegetables (some seem to not know where the produce department is); whole grain products; or skim milk or fat-free dairy products. What will you see? Almost always those giant 3 liter bottles of soft drinks (sometimes sugared, sometimes "diet"; it seems that switching to Diet Coke is regarded as a panacea); white bread; potato chips or nacho chips; butter or margarine; whole milk and ice cream; and above all, "convenience foods" -- frozen, jarred, or canned, always full of fat, salt, and sugar.

For 99%+ of the population, I am convinced, weight is determined by calories in and calories burned. And certainly you can bring your "calories in" substantially below your "calories burned" on all manners of unbalanced diets. I'd be concerned, however, about the long-term effects, especially if your diet is grossly unbalanced for an extended period of time.

I hope whatever you're doing continues to serve you well.

14 posted on 10/30/2001 10:26:14 AM PST by southernnorthcarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson