Of course, this is all rather typical. After all, they've spent the better part of eight years making up explanations for events without the need for physical evidence, so one can easily understand why physical evidence is such a low priority now, eh?
Meanwhile, we're all supposed to be ignorant enough to believe that these events are unconnected, that while Atta may have lived within a mile of the American Media building, and rented a room from the wife of a poisoned man, it's all merely a huge coincidence. The real people behind the anthrax attacks, you know, are those pesky right-wingers, the ones who have created such a problem for the wonderful FBI.
So, the FBI is engaged in more incompetence and more assertions without the need for physical evidence. And the good news is supposed to be that, well, some physical evidence might come in handy if they're going to tell us who's really behind this anthrax business.
Personally, after eight years of Clintinoid explanations for everything from Oklahoma City to TWA 800 to the first WTC attack, I'm convinced that they wouldn't know physical evidence from a hole in the ground. That won't stop them, however, from proclaiming that they've done a heroic job of getting to the bottom of things.
Can't you just see some Iraqi intelligence agent telling Atta to attack the american media. So, he goes to the phone book and looks for the american media, and surprise, surprise, there it is with an address and every thing.
We have to completely gut the FBI and either clean it out or break it up for good. Their power is too scary and the way they frame innocent people.
I have never understood how come we have the FBI, ATF, NSA, etc. when they all seem to be have the same job description. It's redundancy x 5. And the FBI and CIA seem to be twitching places to boot.