Posted on 10/27/2001 3:20:55 PM PDT by ppaul
Sorry about that.
Still, informed and depressed probably beats unaware and cheerful...
I'd missed that one. Thanks for the link.
Absolutely true, tallhappy. Infected sheets and other types of clothing and linens can also infect during a specfic time frame.
In all fairness to Theresa, I think she (?) is attempting to calm people -- even herself. I believe in preparing for the worst case scenario -- then not having it occur. There is much conjecture and speculation at this point. I, for one, am a pragmatist who errs on the side of being overly suspicious and overly prepared. That does not mean I don't go for the "best" in all situations.
Operating from a position of overall knowledge and understanding of potential dangers, conflicts and adversity is definitely operating from a position of strength if used wisely.
Would PETA raise hell & sue under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) if the officials tried to eradicate a disease today?
I'm not sure if ESA covers viruses (probably not), but the "logic" of the animal rights (AR) wackos is that we should not interfere with nature or at least minimize our interference with nature. Therefore, even if the wackos approve treating a disease, their "logic" would dictate that we NEVER eradicate a disease. By definition the disease has an important function in the ongoing evolutionary or Darwinian processes and the overall ecology.
This may sound far-fetched, but the AR wackos already have farmers loosing their livelihoods over sucker fish and fire fighters dying because water from a stream with endangered species must be treated extra carefully.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.