Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apocalypse now? "Dozens of Russia's nuclear weapons are missing"
Times/U.K. ^ | Tuesday, October 23, 2001 | GILES WHITTELL

Posted on 10/23/2001 12:01:43 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Dozens of Russia's nuclear weapons are missing. There is clear evidence that Osama bin Laden's agents have been scouring the world to buy or steal such devices in order to attack the West. Our correspondent investigates how near they may be to succeeding
When Ahmed Salama Mabruk was arrested three years ago in Baku, in Azerbaijan, no one in the West could confirm what he claimed to know. Some still doubt him, but no one now dares to say that he was lying.

Mabruk was personal assistant to Ayman Zawahiri, the bespectacled lieutenant to Osama bin Laden who is now thought to have masterminded the September attacks on New York and Washington.

When Azerbaijani security forces confiscated Mabruk’s laptop they were able to download from it a mine of information about the structure of the al-Qaeda network. He was extradited to Egypt and is now serving a 25-year sentence for planning terrorist activities there, but during his trial he had a chance to exchange a few words in his Cairo courtroom with Mohammed Salah, a reporter with the London-based Al-Hayat newspaper.

“I asked him if al-Qaeda had obtained nuclear weapons and he told me that both al-Qaeda and Islamic Jihad had done so with the help of several different countries,” says Salah. “He said that bin Laden had told his men not to use them except when ordered to.” Salah was sceptical at first. “But now,” he says, “I believe everything.”

Another story that is also suddenly credible comes from Jamal Ahmed al-Fadl, who travelled to Khartoum, the Sudan capital, in 1993, with $1.5 million (£1 million) and orders from bin Laden to buy South African weapons-grade uranium. He says he made contact with a Sudanese Army officer offering the fuel for sale in a 3ft steel cylinder. Al-Fadl was paid $10,000 for his efforts before being removed from the negotiations.

Three years later al-Fadl walked into an American embassy in Africa and turned himself in. He is now the FBI’s most valuable source on bin Laden, its al-Qaeda supergrass, with secret accommodation and a new identity as a member of the bureau’s Witness Protection Programme. He says he doesn’t know if the uranium deal went through.

In fact there has been no confirmation of nuclear weapons or nuclear material falling into bin Laden’s hands — nor any firm statement that he has failed to obtain them. But the deeper you look into this information vacuum, which US taxpayers increasingly consider a poor return on their $30 billion-a-year investment in foreign intelligence, the more worrying it becomes.

Bin Laden has said that it is his duty to seek weapons of mass destruction, and the International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) in Vienna has confirmed hundreds of instances of nuclear smuggling since the collapse of the Soviet Union. They litter the map of Eurasia and implicate a gallery of crooks, usually offering small amounts of non-weapons-grade material to buyers with even less knowledge of nuclear physics than themselves.

A group of Georgian Customs officers treated in 1997 for deep brown leg wounds provides a case in point. They had confiscated several phials of highly radioactive caesium and pocketed it in the hope of finding a buyer. Instead they found that the caesium, which cannot be used in bombs, ate into their flesh.

The following year, according to an Afghan refugee from Mazar-i Sharif now living in London, an entire family fell ill when a smuggler buried a large quantity of what was believed to be uranium in their garden. “Some of them were paralysed from the waist down and all the vegetation in their garden died,” the refugee says. “The uranium probably came from Taliqan or Kunduz province, near the border.”

For most of the 1990s the international community persuaded itself that nuclear smuggling on a larger scale than this was easy to detect and probably not happening. Western leaders are now having to assume the reverse: that only the clowns got caught.

“They are probably the tip of the iceberg,” says Dr Laurie Mylroie, a US academic who claims that the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing was almost certainly masterminded by Iraq, and who insists that President Saddam Hussein was likewise behind the September 11 attacks.

“If Russian organised-crime groups with good contacts and resources got involved in this, you might never hear about it,” says Gary Milhollin, of the Wisconsin Project, a Washington anti-proliferation think-tank. “You tend to pick up the amateurs, not the pros.” Before September 11 such talk might have been alarmist. Now it is a sane reminder of the most sobering reality of the post-Soviet world order. What was the world’s largest nuclear power, with between 15,000 and 40,000 nuclear weapons and enough fissile material for 40,000 more, has spent the past decade staggering under the pressure of rampant corruption and criminality with its nuclear stockpile ill-guarded, compared with America’s. And vulnerable, above all, to the thousands of scientists who built it, but now earn on average $50 a month. The result is what one of Washington’s more moderate non-proliferation experts calls “a nuclear K-Mart”.

Russia’s intercontinental ballistic missiles are not for sale. They are so central to Moscow’s vision of itself as a world power that they remain almost as secure and secret as in the Cold War. But a black market has existed since before the Soviet collapse for a wide range of lesser nuclear assets — from battlefield weapons to “suitcase nukes” built for Soviet special forces and low-grade radioactive material that could be packed with conventional explosives to make the most basic poor-man’s atom bomb.

In the worst scenario, impossible to rule out with no UN weapons inspectors left in Iraq, Saddam could already have acquired enough fissile material for a warhead and mounted it atop a Soviet-built Scud missile.

In the early 1990s the smugglers’ preferred routes led west out of Russia and Ukraine to Eastern Europe and Germany. In 1994, a German police sting at Frankfurt airport led to the arrest of a Colombian in transit from Moscow with a consignment of plutonium in his suitcase, and the smugglers’ focus shifted towards the Caucasus and Central Asia.

There are few wilder or more porous frontiers than the 3,000-mile fence along the southern fringe of the former Soviet Union. It starts on the Black Sea near Batumi, winds along the spine of the Caucasus and continues through scorching deserts to the Pamirs and the Tien Shan, interrupted only by the Caspian.

In the middle of it, Uzbek-istan’s short border with Afghanistan has been closed for the past four years. Otherwise all bets are off. I have interviewed Chechens in Georgia’s spectacular Pankisi Gorge who walk unhindered over the high passes of the Caucasus in and out of their war-torn homeland when the snows allow. Not far to the east, customs checks on trains from southern Russia to Azerbaijan are entirely avoidable with bribes. In the high Pamirs you can drive for hours along Tajikistan’s border with the Vakhan Corridor in northeastern Afghanistan and see hardly a soul.

It is no surprise to learn from the IAEA that in September 1998 police arrested eight people in Turkey and seized 10lb of uranium 235, destination unknown; nor that two men were arrested trying to sell plutonium in the remote Kyrgyz border town of Kara Balta the following year; nor that 4lb of highly enriched uranium was found less than three months ago packed into a glass jar in neat discs the size of ice hockey pucks in an hotel room in the Georgian Black Sea port of Batumi.

The list is merely a sample of what is known. It does not include police and media reports based on personal testimony, such as one in the Arabic Al-Watan news magazine in early 1999 claiming that bin Laden had pulled off a huge deal for 20 Russian nuclear warheads obtained for him by the Chechen mafia in exchange for $30 million in cash and two tons of opium. It does not include the FBI’s ongoing operation against a Pakistani intelligence agent with close ties to bin Laden identified as Mohammed Abbas, who placed an order with an undercover US agent posing as an arms dealer for six nuclear switches and a quantity of plutonium after announcing over lunch in New York that he meant to “kill all Americans”.

None of this, at any rate, came as a surprise to the CIA. “Bin Laden has been trying to get his hands on enriched uranium for seven or eight years,” Robert Wolsey, the agency’s former director, told reporters a week after the September 11 attacks.

Why, then, did the world’s only superpower not do more to stop him? It is a question that torments America, but answers are already emerging. On the one hand the US intelligence community was hamstrung by internal turf wars, bureaucratic regulation and limits on what it could do to protect Russia’s nuclear stockpile because of Russia’s security interests and the risk of losing its own agents — a scenario considered unacceptable in the “risk-averse” post-Cold War era. Even more seriously, the CIA appears to have relied too heavily on the assumption that bin Laden could not have nuclear weapons since building and maintaining them takes huge political will and the resources of a nation state.

Experts are now saying that this was a false assumption on several counts. The first dates from 1997, when General Aleksandr Lebed, then head of Russia’s national security council, dropped a bombshell by declaring that dozens, possibly hundreds, of suitcase-sized nuclear weapons built in the 1970s were unaccounted for and were “a potentially perfect weapon for nuclear terrorism and blackmail”.

Lebed was blackballed by the Russian military establishment and thrown off a commission set up to investigate his allegations. Russian nuclear officials ridiculed them, but the following month Lebed named the weapons as the RA-115 and the RA-115-01 (an underwater variant), each weighing roughly 30 kilograms. Aleksei Yablokov, a former environmental adviser to President Yeltsin, said that 84 out of a total of 132 were missing. At a conference in Berlin, Lebed said he believed that most of them had been stationed in border areas no longer within Russia. He warned one of his detractors, the then Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin: “Sleep, Viktor Stepanovich, and you just might not wake up.”

Lebed is now running for a second term as governor of Krasnoyarsk and has refused all interview requests since the attacks. However, a former Western diplomat who travels frequently to Central Asia confirmed last week that the suitcase-sized weapons almost certainly exist. “It’s very plausible that a device has been smuggled out and even to Afghanistan,” he adds. “Osama bin Laden is as possible a recipient as Saddam Hussein.”

Compact nuclear weapons offer terrorists an easy answer to the question “Why build when you can buy?” Pakistan’s rush to build an estimated 120 nuclear warheads has given bin Laden yet another option — theft. President Musharraf insists that his nuclear arsenal is safe, but the US considers the risk of Pakistani warheads falling into the wrong hands so great given the number of Taleban sympathisers in his ISI intelligence service that it has offered to fly in perimeter security for the country’s nuclear bases and install fail-safe mechanisms on its weapons to prevent them being detonated.

So far Musharraf has declined the offer. Pakistan and the West must therefore hope that bin Laden has failed in all his attempts to buy nuclear weapons and material. But even if he has, the risk of nuclear terrorism remains real and serious, thanks to Saddam.

T he Iraqi dictator nearly bankrupted his country trying to build nuclear weapons before the arrival of UN inspectors in the wake of the Gulf War. This has not stopped him trying again since their departure.

The proof, or the closest thing to it, is in the form of a strange order placed with the Siemens electronics giant by the Iraqi Government in 1998 for six lithotripter devices designed to break up kidney stones with highpowered shock waves. As medical machinery the lithotripters were not covered by UN sanctions. Each used a precision electronic switch, and Iraq ordered an extra 120 of these. As Gary Milhollin of the Wisconsin Project wrote in The New Yorker: “Iraq’s strange hankering for this particular spare part becomes less mysterious when one reflects that the switch in question has another use: it can trigger an atomic bomb.”

Former UN weapons inspectors in Iraq believed in 1999 that Saddam already had the components for three nuclear weapons, each needing 32 electronic switches. Whether he has obtained enough fuel for them is one of the critical questions driving the debate in Washington on whether to expand the war on terror to Iraq. Another is whether Saddam sponsored the September attacks.

Hawks in the Bush administration have been scouring the globe for an Iraqi link that would justify finishing the job begun by Operation Desert Storm in 1991, and they may have found it: earlier this month the Czech Foreign Minister, Jan Kavan, flew to Washington with documents showing that Mohammed Atta, the pilot of the first jet to hit the World Trade Centre, visited the Iraqi embassy in Prague for meetings with its consul last year.

“Why would they meet?” asks Laurie Mylroie, whose work on Iraqi-sponsored terrorism has a close following among those in the Bush White House pushing for a broad offensive against Iraq. “To have a cup of tea?” Asked how scared we should be of the possibility of an Iraqi-manufactured nuclear weapon detonating as the conflict unfolds, Dr Mylroie replies: “Scared is not the right word. This is war. It’s like the Second World War. People have to make the right decisions; if they make the wrong decisions tens or hundreds of thousands could die.”

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: cbkaty
The specific destructive capability of most of the Backpack nuclear demolition devices the USA developed are in the 1 to 5 KT range. It is theoretically possible to achieve yields of up to 50 kt from such a device I do not know specifics about the Soviet models. If one is going beyond man portable then and will to consider transport by motor vehicle then any yeild up to the maximum developed capability is theoretically possible. The big secret with these devices is keeping them small enough and light enough for one person to carry. Once the threshhold of weight greater than 100 kg is crossed then it is a question of how modern the design is.

I note the Pakistani bombs are likely not man portable but they could very weasily be welded to the hull of a ship entering a US port and detonated by some means while there.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

61 posted on 10/23/2001 7:24:02 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
For more info on Russian capabilities, take a gander at this little tidbit:
Biological Weapons
62 posted on 10/23/2001 7:48:04 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
I looked it over--some of this stuff is comical. "Copper cable" probably translates to "we stole it when no one was looking." Other stuff looks like it's complete BS. Welcome to the Yard Sale at the End of History. Eat your heart out, Mr. Fukuyama.
63 posted on 10/23/2001 8:22:50 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d
A gun-type device could explain their interest in highly-enriched uranium instead of plutonium.
64 posted on 10/23/2001 8:46:47 AM PDT by drmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
"Btw, we are running into the same problems with upkeep of our own nukes, if I remember correctly. I seem to remember that the upkeep window is about 6 to 7 years for Tritium swapout."

Very valid comment.

We're supposedly using the necessary Tritium from deactivated Nukes to replenish.

65 posted on 10/23/2001 9:12:48 AM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
An atomic or A-bomb may be constructed using a few tens of kilograms of highly enriched fissile uranium. This requires an enrichment plant to raise the low content of the fissile isotope of uranium (U235 at 0.7%) existing naturally, to a very high level of concentration (> 90%) by displacing the normally non-fissile isotope U238. Large quantities of natural uranium, in the form of milled uranium, refined to yellowcake and then converted to uranium hexafluoride, are required for this process. The depleted uranium (U238) by- product can be used as part of the fissile core of a nuclear warhead, first to contain the nuclear process and, instants later, contributing to the fission energy release.

To increase the yield and reliability of yield of an A- bomb, the enriched uranium can be replaced with a few kilograms of highly fissile plutonium. Plutonium is produced by reprocessing natural or low-enriched uranium spent fuel that has been irradiated in a nuclear reactor. This requires a fuel fabrication plant, a moderated or thermal reactor, and a reprocessing or chemical separation plant.

To advance the design of an A-bomb, it is advantageous to boost the initial fissioning of the plutonium. This is achieved by introducing a spurt of neutrons to the fissile heart of the warhead, either with a small pea- sized source of radioactive polonium combined with beryllium, or by creating neutrons from the fusing a few grams of radioactive tritium and deuterium. Both of these techniques require a nuclear reactor to generate the radioactive materials, and conventional chemical plants to isolate either the deuterium or beryllium, and to provide lithium as a source of tritium.

The yield of the warhead can be increased if the atomic fission stage, the A-bomb, is used to trigger a second stage involving fusion. This is the basis of a thermonuclear or H-bomb. For this, the intense and almost instantaneous energy of the A-bomb is deployed to fuse a few kilograms of tritium and deuterium. The tritium is generated within the warhead from a fusion fuel of lithium-deuteride, a simple hydride of lithium metal and heavy water, produced by conventional chemical processes. Further increase in the nuclear yield is gained if the energy from the fusion stage is applied to fissioning a mantle of depleted uranium (U238).

66 posted on 10/23/2001 9:24:16 AM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
ComChina would be a good supplier of fresh suitcase nukes. I would say China has the tech. to make them. Making on time delivery as needed. China brings suitcase into the USA via CosCo or some other ChiCom controlled entity.

A Bin Laden cell picks up the nuke and uses it at the right time and place.

67 posted on 10/23/2001 9:48:40 AM PDT by JJ59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Outstanding post #51, harpseal. Thank you.
68 posted on 10/23/2001 9:53:23 AM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LLAN-DDEUSANT
.....and we need to finish the Palestine question. In the former we should just declare that we have achieved our goals and call it quits, in the latter we just draw lines and create a viable Palestinian state. Sadly for Israel, this can not be done in Palestine without retracting the lands Israel promised of the purpose but then stole back.

What nonsense. So what if you don't like Israel. Giving the Pallies the West Bank and Gaza won't stop these Islamics. Bin Laden wants us out of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Where the action really is. This is where the black gold is. Rag tag Palestinians with their mortar attacks, boy rock throwers and suicide bombers are a side show.

Saudi oil, Kuwaiti oil and all of Gulf oil is center stage.

69 posted on 10/23/2001 9:56:57 AM PDT by JJ59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JJ59
Uh-huh. And when spectrographic analysis of the fallout reveals that it was made in China (easily done, when you consider that China has had a BUNCH of atmospheric tests for us to take fallout samples from), the resulting US retaliation destroys China as any sort of viable nation-state.

And the Chinese KNOW this. They aren't stupid.

70 posted on 10/23/2001 9:59:44 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
/Blush.

Thank you for the kind words from one whose prose is always worth the read.

We are in a war for survival of our nation and ourselves and we had better start realizing it. I do not have any claim as a great thinker or philosopher here on free Republic but I jave been in combat and I know you do not screw arround in combat or somebody is going to cause your loved ones to get a message you will not be coming home.

Anyone who thinks this is a game has not been paying attention. Julius Ceaser when he crossed the Rubicon said "The die is cast." Well the USA has crossed its Rubicon on September 11, 2001 and we had all best start understanding what that implies. We no longer can indulge in Political Correctness or halfway measures in the war or we are going to get flamed and the result will be our ashes in a heap of rubble.

The NBC threshhold has been crossed already. We haven't done it but we are on the recieving end of a bio-warfare attack.

Stay well - stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

71 posted on 10/23/2001 10:03:20 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Well said, harpseal! Thanks so much for your response.
72 posted on 10/23/2001 10:06:34 AM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Well how about this: ComChina makes 5 suitcase nukes that are untraceable. That are not made from the materials usually used. Suitcase nukes are unusually made to begin with. Different than your average atomic bomb. My speculations of course.
73 posted on 10/23/2001 10:12:24 AM PDT by JJ59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Uh-huh. And when spectrographic analysis of the fallout reveals that it was made in China (easily done, when you consider that China has had a BUNCH of atmospheric tests for us to take fallout samples from), the resulting US retaliation destroys China as any sort of viable nation-state.

I think you are making to great an assumption here. Most of the raioactove fallout is as a result of the exposure of the material in the blast area to intense radiation itself a large flux of neutrons. Definitive proof of the source of a nuclear weapon that has exploded can not be garned from the fallout. Given the nature of the initial fission which triggers the fusion and then the secondary fission of the U238 casing the rare traces of identifiable products would be most unlikely.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

74 posted on 10/23/2001 10:15:52 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JJ59
You still need bomb-grade uranium or plutonium. It's not like you can go down to Osco Drug and buy it--there are a VERY few facilities in the world that produce such goods, and they are very well known, their output is very tightly controlled, and their products are easily identified via remote sensing tools. Chinese bombs will be built with Chinese materials. Those materials will be easily identified as Chinese. Allowing Osama bin Laden to detonate 5 suitcase nukes in America, leaving a nice radioactive finger pointing at Beijing, is really stupid. In return for inconsequential damage to America, the Chinese Politburo would sign their death warrant. Now, maybe Osama would be dumb enough to sign off on this. The problem is that the Chinese aren't that stupid, and they are the ones with the nukes, not Osama.
75 posted on 10/23/2001 10:18:39 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Not true--read Chuck Hansen's stuff. During the Cold War and the era of atmospheric testing, we were able to identify not only which reactor or reactors a bomb's components came from, but which PART of the reactor, just from the fallout. It's how we monitored the progress of the Russian nuclear weapons program before the U-2, as well--we were able to ID whether a given bomb came from the same reactor as "Joe I," or whether the Russians had built a new one.
76 posted on 10/23/2001 10:22:23 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: readyourhistory
Ok. Put up or shut up. Publish a link to the demands of the terrorists, where they clearly state "do x, and we will stop our attacks, otherwise we will continue them."
77 posted on 10/23/2001 10:42:48 AM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I have read that but a large part of those deductions were based upon knowing and comparing the exact nature of the areas of the test. Further, the analysis was not completed in a day a week or a month. I am very aware of the released material and it just is not clear that we have the data that would give us this information and the changes since China started its underground tests are certainly not a part of the database which could be used for comparison.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

78 posted on 10/23/2001 11:34:52 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: LLAN-DDEUSANT
it's the pictures of Palestinians kids being knee capped by the barbarous behaviour of the Israeli ethnic cleaners.........

My heavens. Such crude Arab propaganda they must get in their Islamic state TV and state controlled press. Hardly a balanced image. The rest of the world sees the real images of Islamic barbarism. Suicide bombers. World Trade Towers being attacked with 5000+ Americans dead.
Got a newsflash for you ace. The Palestinian rock throwers are out and the Palestinian gunmen are in. And yes, Israel can and does shoot back.

Associated Press

Associated Press

80 posted on 10/23/2001 12:46:52 PM PDT by JJ59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson