Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"How dare you call us communist China Communist China has become history" - Chinese APEC Tantrum
South China Morning Post ^ | 10-19-01 | VIVIEN PIK-KWAN CHAN

Posted on 10/18/2001 4:27:42 PM PDT by tallhappy

Friday, October 19, 2001
Anger as minister blames Taipei for row over envoy

VIVIEN PIK-KWAN CHAN in Shanghai

China's dispute with Taiwan over who should represent Taipei at the summit exploded into an open row at a press conference in Shanghai yesterday.

Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan told journalists at the end of the two-day ministerial meeting that Taipei should be blamed for the dispute, which left the island's representation at the Apec leaders' summit unresolved.

Mr Tang angrily reprimanded a Taiwanese reporter for using the term "communist China", a common term used by Taiwan, when asking a question.

Mr Tang said: "This is Shanghai, a big city on Chinese soil. How dare you call us communist China. Communist China has become history. Such a term no longer exists."

The row centres on Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian's decision to name retired vice-president Li Yuan-zu to represent him. Taiwan, which joined Apec as an "economy" but not as a country after China's objections, is not allowed to send a top political leader to the summit. Mr Li is scheduled to leave Taiwan today for the two-day leaders' summit starting tomorrow, but has yet to receive an invitation from China.

"Taiwan authorities are the ones to be blamed for the envoy row. Such disputes should not have occurred in the first place," Mr Tang said. He accused Taipei of conspiring to cast a shadow over China's hosting of the summit.

"I believe there's some delicate political plot behind [the row]," he said.

"We provide opportunities and facilities to all Apec economies without discrimination. And we welcome all member economies to participate in this meeting," he said.

Taiwan Economic Affairs Minister Lin Hsin-I, answering another question, said Mr Li was picked because he was the best candidate but he had been forced to postpone his departure.

On one occasion, as US Secretary of State Colin Powell and Russia's Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov looked on, Mr Tang - who was chairing the press conference - tried to block Mr Lin from commenting further.

"I don't think it is necessary. It is unnecessary to waste time on such a trivial subject," said Mr Tang while signalling to a press officer not to allow Mr Lin to comment. Past Apec forum hosts have been more flexible in accepting Taiwan's envoy.

Early yesterday in Taipei, Mr Chen called Beijing's actions a "total disregard of protocol".

Taiwan's Foreign Minister, Tien Hung-mao, last night hinted that the island might decline to take part in the summit and accused the mainland of "unreasonable treatment".

Taipei was led to believe the mainland would follow "past precedents" of Apec summits, but Beijing decided instead to dictate more stringent terms without consultation with Taiwan, Mr Tien said.

"It was regrettable that the mainland did not keep its promises," he said. "We would like to take this opportunity to protest.

"The Government of the Republic of China (Taiwan) is determined to maintain its national sovereignty and dignity and this position shall not change merely because of mainland China's efforts to stifle us."

If Taiwan fails to send an envoy to Shanghai, its leader may be represented by Mr Lin, the most senior economic official at the Apec meeting.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: tallhappy
Was this cleared with Hillary? She's not going to like it.
21 posted on 10/18/2001 4:56:18 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"Some Are More Equal Than Others" China?
22 posted on 10/18/2001 4:57:52 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I think Mr. Tang was startled to discover the difference between his own obedient cabinet officials and foreigners unmotivated to digest such absurd propaganda.
23 posted on 10/18/2001 5:03:09 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Exactly !
24 posted on 10/18/2001 5:05:21 PM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy; ALOHA RONNIE; B4Ranch
Because China IS communist!!!!!!!! I just wish Biil and Hitlery would go to their homeland ( communist China).

NEVER TRUST China !

They are an enemy of the USA

25 posted on 10/18/2001 5:09:00 PM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Once again, the ChiComs prove that they have zilch understanding of Public Relations.

It is amazing how carefully and gracefully they take aim -- and shoot themselves right in the foot.

26 posted on 10/18/2001 5:10:05 PM PDT by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Lol ...

The East should remain inscrutable ... they've none of the "former Soviet" finesse with regard erosion of the image of the enemy.

27 posted on 10/18/2001 5:15:34 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
I thought you'd enjoy this thread. Strange happenings are afoot....(^: I've been watching too much Sherlock Holmes, are afoot, LOL!
28 posted on 10/18/2001 5:16:17 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
M-O-O-N That spells communist.
29 posted on 10/18/2001 5:26:03 PM PDT by Moto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Damn Commies...

Audio

30 posted on 10/18/2001 5:27:13 PM PDT by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley
Can we call it 'Liberal China'? How 'bout 'Progressive China'?

No. I think the name ought to be "Hillary China".

31 posted on 10/18/2001 5:31:43 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Fine with me. I'll just call them Fascist China.
32 posted on 10/18/2001 5:35:42 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
I was thinkin' they might prefer the moniker "Moderate"
33 posted on 10/18/2001 5:37:09 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"Wow this is incredible. What should we call them? Dictatorship China? Nazi China? The Evil Chinese Empire? Soviet China?"

How about "Hegemonist China"? :)

34 posted on 10/18/2001 8:59:11 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Riley
Can we call it 'Liberal China'? How 'bout 'Progressive China'?

'New Democrat China'?

35 posted on 10/18/2001 8:59:40 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
Sounds like Mr. Tang has been drinking the "other beverage". Maybe he should change his name to Mr. Koolade. I wonder if perhaps his first name is "Red"?
36 posted on 10/18/2001 9:01:50 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Snow Bunny
"NEVER TRUST China !"

Never say never. If the commies get dropkicked into the next dimension, we'll be able to trust China.

37 posted on 10/18/2001 9:02:47 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Would they prefer Democrat?
38 posted on 10/18/2001 9:07:49 PM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Hey, the guy is right. It ain't communist ... it's the post Mao military oligarchical dictatorship.
39 posted on 10/18/2001 9:10:07 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Quite whacked. Totally out of touch with reality.
40 posted on 10/18/2001 9:28:16 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson