Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
It's kind of ironic. If someone had asked which people would be most helpful to the Islamic extremists, because they would do what they could to undermine Bush and the war effort, it's exactly the people who have been attacked with anthrax: The chief leader and planner for the Democrats, and the liberal presstitutes. The only target they seem to have missed so far is Christiane Amanpour and CNN. I suppose even Bin Ladin is aware that they are among his best friends.
13 posted on 10/17/2001 6:53:22 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
Other FReepers have speculated that the reason the enemy chose liberal targets is to engender suspicion, in the media and political circles, that the VRWC might behind these terrorist acts. It's the enemy's bid to pit American against American.
27 posted on 10/17/2001 7:00:16 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
It's kind of ironic. If someone had asked which people would be most helpful to the Islamic extremists, because they would do what they could to undermine Bush and the war effort, it's exactly the people who have been attacked with anthrax: The chief leader and planner for the Democrats, and the liberal presstitutes. The only target they seem to have missed so far is Christiane Amanpour and CNN. I suppose even Bin Ladin is aware that they are among his best friends.

Listen, I've lived over there..street level with them. #1, They would have contempt for the liberal/communists in our government, mainstream press and in our country. They would buddy up to them as a necessary evil but then strike them first because mainly the left in our country is immoral, very immoral in their eyes and weak, malable.

They would hold them in severe disrespect yet use them but now the terrorists are going for broke. They'll try to get rid of our immoral people because they hold them in such disrespect and contempt. I don't know for sure if or when bloody bill will be hit but it probably won't be too long because traitor bill is not only immoral and violates how they think people and leaders should live, but they would despise him because he was a weak leader and a weak man. They won't care if traitor bill still has some value to help them. I think that traitor bill, daschale, and the other liberal/communists need to be very very careful but once the terrorists start to really fall, once bin laden falls and the tide turns, the rest, even saddam (if still alive and not nuked like he should be) will lick their boots and try to keep them alive to cry on their shoulders, to try to preserve their own lives and power.

BUSH, you reward the attacks against Americans and the WMD attacks by openly saying that you support a country for palestinians. You have betrayed Americans because of your stance. You can't reward those who have murdered us and will continue to murder us in the future through WMD and conventional means.

These people (the terrorists, those that supported them) will only respect you if you show them strength. You are a moral man, they won't attack you for the same reasons they will the democrats, clintons, media. Showing strength is the only thing that will save us now. Track down the anthrax and as per our national policy, nuke the country and people that support it's use on America.

AND you have to tell them, "No way in H*ll will you support palestine as long as the terrorists, their threat to Americans, their attacks on America, her friends and allies are allowed to continue or continue or are capable of continuing in the form they've taken lately. These latest terrorists must all be killed if we want peace for any length of time. This includes saddam, iranians, iraqis, syrians, any and all who support and gave support to terrorists. Terrorism CAN NOT be rewarded in any way, shape or form." Though I must say Iran is certainly coming around publically. I still think the majority of their people are our friends. Hmm, I wonder if the moderates are threatening the clerics and militants' overthrow and it's scaring those still in control.

What Rudy did was right, in returning the check to Sheik Talal, according to Western thinking and standards. But to our moderate friends in the Middle East, what Rudy did was very rude. They don't completely understand how we think nor do we, how they think. To most Arabs, they let their people do as they wish when not in their country. They drink, party, date Western girls, etc. but the one rule they have about that is that they shouldn't flaunt it, it shouldn't be excessively overt. I believe a Sheik Adnan (Dodi Al Fayed's uncle) lost his government position over such actions becomming public knowledge..in his own country. He was too public, too celebrity.

Think of the difference in thinking between men and women..."Men come from Mars, women come from Venus" kind of thinking. The difference between Muslim/Arab thinking and the West is on a similar tract.

And the truth is, Sheik Talal didn't and hasn't said anything that Bush and Blair, et al, aren't saying right now, yet Sheik Talal was publically humilated for saying it. IMHO, Bush and Blair shouldn't even be saying it.

117 posted on 10/17/2001 8:07:05 AM PDT by chantal7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson