Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors Say Bio-Attacks Would Overwhelm Hospitals
Reuters via Yahoo! ^ | 10/16/2001

Posted on 10/16/2001 10:30:08 PM PDT by MississippiMan

Doctors Say Bio-Attack Would Overwhelm Hospitals

CHICAGO (Reuters) - A biological attack with anthrax or another agent could quickly overwhelm an already overburdened U.S. health care system, hospital emergency room physicians said on Tuesday.

While the number of U.S. hospital emergency departments has shrunk by 20 percent in the past decade, they are treating 14 percent more patients, said Dr. Michael Carius, president of the American College of Emergency Physicians (news - web sites).

``A biological or chemical attack could push us over the brink,'' Carius told a news conference during the group's annual convention.

``We have to build the elasticity back into the system, make more (hospital) beds available, and train our people to recognize the symptoms'' of anthrax and other biological or chemical agents, he said.

Several Florida colleagues reported that hospitals were overtaxed in the area of a Boca Raton publishing firm where hundreds of employees have been tested and are now being retested for anthrax.

A photo editor at American Media Inc. died, while eight other employees have tested positive for exposure to anthrax.

The emergency physicians group said tens of thousands of nurses and medical technicians have left the profession because of low pay and poor working conditions, a shortage that could turn critical in the event of a biological or chemical attack.

Even recognizing an epidemic is difficult for emergency departments, where doctors and nurses are taught to treat one patient at a time and work in shifts, said Jonathan Burstein, an emergency physician at Harvard Medical School (news - web sites) and a Boston hospital.

One solution would be to equip public health authorities with the ability to compile cases and symptoms daily and look for patterns, he added.

A study to appear in the November issue of the group's journal, Annals of Emergency Medicine, found that only one out of 30 hospitals surveyed last year had stockpiled medicine for a biological attack. Five out of six hospitals could only handle 10 to 50 casualties at once.

The physicians' group said it was lobbying the U.S. Congress to allocate more money to local efforts to prepare for such an attack and to legislate changes in reimbursements for care that would put hospitals on a better financial footing.

Many hospital emergency departments have been shut after losing money treating patients lacking health insurance for whom the emergency rooms provide the care of last resort.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Simply presented for your consideration and amusement. As you know, we don't have anything to worry about. Our government said so. Anthrax no big deal. Plenty of antibiotics on hand. NOT increasing stockpiles by factor of five because there's anything to worry about. ;-)

MM

1 posted on 10/16/2001 10:30:08 PM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
First off:

Nuclear, Biological, & Chemical Warfare- Survival Skills, Pt. II

And here, I seem to recall, are some links that tell how badly overloaded even one major incident would leave our health care system:

The Poor-Boy Nuke-- Bioterrorism***

2 posted on 10/17/2001 3:11:19 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Many hospital emergency departments have been shut after losing money treating patients lacking health insurance for whom the emergency rooms provide the care of last resort.

Quickly, that sentence is wrong. The ER's are too often the care of FIRST resort. That's a big problem.

Last year I got a survey (actually 3 when I didn't answer the first two) from a university hospital wanting to know what antidotes were on hand for a terrorist attack--protopam, atropine, sodium thiosulfate, etc. I just laughed. Out in the countryside, there might be enough drugs to treat one patient, but mostly there is atropine that might be used for nerve gases, since it is used also for pre-ops and bradycardia.

To anyone who is on the inside, Tommy Thompson is a HOOT.

3 posted on 10/17/2001 4:10:54 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
The government/insurance regulating agencies have been shutting down hospital beds for at least the last 20 years. No hospital can add any beds without going through a long application process with regional planners. Three hospitals in my area wanted to expand by setting up "satellite facilities" in areas where the region was growing rapidly. Their "Certificate of Need" was turned down time after time. Insurance companies want to keep bed utilization as close to 100% as possible, since this tends to keep costs down. It's the medical equivalent of the "just-in-time" system used in retail and manufacturing. Assembly line medicine with low inventory and no excess storage to pay for.
4 posted on 10/17/2001 5:42:27 AM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson