Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMRight
These verses were not speaking of keeping a literal feast. Paul would not use leavened or unleavened bread regarding a literal feast knowing that it was part of the law done away in Christ.

1 Corinthians 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:

8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

37,521 posted on 03/29/2002 11:33:54 AM PST by vmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37519 | View Replies ]


To: vmatt
These verses were not speaking of keeping a literal feast.

Why? Christ took the place of a real lamb for a real feast (Passover).

Paul would not use leavened or unleavened bread regarding a literal feast knowing that it was part of the law done away in Christ.

Why? The real feast used unleavened bread.

Christ's sacrifice was of a piece with the Passover Seder. Why did Christ institute the new covenant within the boundaries of the old (the passover supper, that is)?

You are correct that Easter (and to a similar extent Christmas) have become flooded (and in some cases buried) with pagan ritual signs. But that does not change the real celebration of His death burial and resurrection. Christmas is harder since it does not even correspond to the actual birth day of Christ, but Easter is forever tied to the Passover.

37,524 posted on 03/29/2002 11:52:24 AM PST by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37521 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson