Skip to comments.
DISTURBING NEW YORK TRAGEDY CODE CLUSTER EMERGING
BibleCodeDigest.com ^
| 11 OCT 2001
| BIBLE CODE DIGEST.COM STAFF
Posted on 10/10/2001 11:45:30 PM PDT by Quix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-190 next last
My we be prayerfully alert; fasting as led; personally responsible and prepared; compassionate; attentive to God's leading in our individual lives and our Nation.
1
posted on
10/10/2001 11:45:30 PM PDT
by
Quix
(WILLFUL BLINDNESS MAY DENY VALIDITY Wisdom prayerfully considers it)
To: Quix
I think it's BS.
2
posted on
10/10/2001 11:55:10 PM PDT
by
Giddyupgo
To: Giddyupgo
As a shrink, it is difficult to understand your conviction about it. . . .
unless I consider fierce bias to be a significant factor.
The very solid and reliable odds are simply to FAR over the line on the side of--well--of causality. . . I know of no other rational explanation.
Given the evidence, your position TAKES ENORMOUSLY MORE FAITH--EVEN BLIND FAITH--than believing in the codes.
3
posted on
10/10/2001 11:57:57 PM PDT
by
Quix
To: Quix
The so called " BIBLE CODES " have been long ago discredited. They, like all other fortune tellers and prognosticators ( hey, aren't they supposed to be considered to be EVIL, in GOD's eyes ? ) always come out with this stuff AFTER the fact. Like statistics, Bible verses can and are used to prove anything and everything.
There has been abortion, adultery, and every other imaginable sin , in every nation, in every era, and to claim otherwise is disingenuous. For GOD to " punish " people who did not have an abortion or commit adultery, as a supposed " wake up call " , for those who have done, is patently ridiulous and the antithesis of every religous tenent I know of.
Ezekial was a prophet. Prophets appeared in ancient Israel to warn those people, and those people ONLY ! They weren't some weird , early form of Nostrodamus, prognosticating future happenings in the VERY far off future.
4
posted on
10/10/2001 11:58:18 PM PDT
by
nopardons
To: Quix
oooops.. . . not "to FAR" but
tooooo FAR ove the line.
5
posted on
10/10/2001 11:59:25 PM PDT
by
Quix
To: nopardons
nopardons is right. This is a crock.
6
posted on
10/11/2001 12:02:17 AM PDT
by
Junior_G
To: Quix
Who calculated those odds and how did they do it?
7
posted on
10/11/2001 12:02:21 AM PDT
by
jammer
To: Quix
Me thinks you have no clue whatsoever as to the meaning of "statistical significance". Go take a class...
To: nopardons
Your evidence, research appears to be EXCEEDINGLY out of date. The skeptics have entered into a fair minded and well structured experiment involving the codes and other texts as well. The Bible Codes won hands down and by a HUGE margin. The skeptics were stunned. But it's not so popular in the popular press to report these facts.
The Bible Codes is nothing similar at all to the prohibited fortune tellers of The Bible.
If you deny that Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Amos et al . . . not to mention John The Revelator have nothing prophetic to say about our era, I begin to wonder if you are reading the same Bible. . . . or whether your fair-mindedness has been put to bed, first.
God, outside of time, can do whatever He wants within our dimensions and outsied of them.
9
posted on
10/11/2001 12:04:07 AM PDT
by
Quix
To: Giddyupgo
-... ...
To: Quix
In text centered around the lengthy New York code there are far fewer occurrences of the World Trade Center acronym as a code, as if to represent its horrible absence from the Manhattan skyline. Translation: If we find codes matching the events, that proves that they really exist! And if we don't find codes matching the events, that REALLY proves that they exist!!!
11
posted on
10/11/2001 12:04:21 AM PDT
by
TexRef
To: Quix
Given that scholars believe there are many double prophecies in the Bible, or instances where a prophecy is fulfilled once and then fulfilled again in a totally different situation many years later,What is their basis for that belief? If they do believe that, what basis do we have to call them scholars?
12
posted on
10/11/2001 12:04:26 AM PDT
by
jammer
To: Economist_MA
My PhD utilized statisticas extensively.
It's not my greatest strength nor my greatest weakness.
I've had more than one class in statistics.
It would appear from my perspective, that you have forgotten your class; have not examined the evidence or have biases so strong and extensive as to render such a class and evidence as useless to your mental considerations.
13
posted on
10/11/2001 12:06:30 AM PDT
by
Quix
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: JMJ333
Lunacy aloft.
15
posted on
10/11/2001 12:06:34 AM PDT
by
gcruse
To: Giddyupgo
Wait a minute...
"Code Cluster"
1...2..
Yes -- 11 letters!!!
I think that there's something to this!!!
16
posted on
10/11/2001 12:07:28 AM PDT
by
TexRef
To: Smittyat90210
Based on what evidence or sound logic?
17
posted on
10/11/2001 12:08:08 AM PDT
by
Quix
To: Quix
I can think of nothing more humiliating than posting rubbish like this and confessing to the forum that you actually believe it. You poor, poor soul...
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Quix
My eyes glaze, I'm dizzy....
20
posted on
10/11/2001 12:09:50 AM PDT
by
onyx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-190 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson