Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CommiesOut
The FBI did not believe we had enough evidence to indict bin Laden at that time, and therefore opposed bringing him to the United States," said Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, who was deputy national security adviser then.

What a lieing piece of manure. Resentful west spurned Sudan's key terror files (Gobs of info offered on Terrorists)

I didn't totally trust that Sudan was telling the truth about this, but Samuel R. Berger just confirmed it.

10 posted on 10/03/2001 2:30:29 AM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lion's Cub, Common Tator
That Observer article to which you provided a link gives explosive evidence suggesting that the Clinton administration was protecting bin Laden and his organization. Andrew Sullivan predicted yesterday that Sandy Berger would have to spin what's in that article somehow. This article in today's Compost is the spinning that Sullivan predicted.
19 posted on 10/03/2001 4:19:22 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Lion's Cub
Berger has been all over the news trying to cover his and Clinton's collective backsides. I saw hin last night on ABC and it was obvious he was lying like an actor.

Let us all please remember that before he became a distinguished member of Clinton's cabinet, that he was a lobbyist for RED China.

Regards,

25 posted on 10/03/2001 4:45:09 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson