Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lion's Cub, Common Tator
That Observer article to which you provided a link gives explosive evidence suggesting that the Clinton administration was protecting bin Laden and his organization. Andrew Sullivan predicted yesterday that Sandy Berger would have to spin what's in that article somehow. This article in today's Compost is the spinning that Sullivan predicted.
19 posted on 10/03/2001 4:19:22 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
Andrew Sullivan predicted yesterday that Sandy Berger would have to spin what's in that article

I thought Berger was a bumbling idiot then (which is why he was bubba's choice) and my opinion has not changed. The same with Bill Richardson. Now they are presented as "experts" by the media.

As for Richardson, how hard was his job? Even then it was half-assed. Anyone knows if you are going to beg with a tin cup, you should put on a pair of sunglasses.

29 posted on 10/03/2001 4:54:45 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
Here's how Andrew Sullivan predicted Sandy Berger's spinning yesterday:

MORE EVIDENCE OF CLINTON'S FAILURE: Fascinating report in the left-wing British paper, the Observer, about the extent of the Clinton administration's responsibility for hobbling our intelligence operations in the last ten years. Vast files of intelligence from Sudan, specifically about Osama bin Laden, were simply ignored or spurned by Clinton officials. According to the Observer, "One senior CIA source admitted last night: 'This represents the worst single intelligence failure in this whole terrible business. It is the key to the whole thing right now. It is reasonable to say that had we had this data we may have had a better chance of preventing the attacks.' He said the blame for the failure lay in the 'irrational hatred' the Clinton administration felt for the source of the proffered intelligence - Sudan, where bin Laden and his leading followers were based from 1992-96. He added that after a slow thaw in relations which began last year, it was only now that the Sudanese information was being properly examined for the first time." Quick, Sandy. Better leak something to the New York Times to spin this one away.

30 posted on 10/03/2001 4:58:57 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
Andrew Sullivan predicted yesterday that Sandy Berger would have to spin what's in that article somehow. This article in today's Compost is the spinning that Sullivan predicted.

That is exactly my take on the Washington Post article. Mostly CYA with some facts thrown in.

54 posted on 10/03/2001 8:46:24 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson