Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE CLINTON NATIONAL SECURITY SCANDAL AND COVERUP - Thread X
Senator Inhofe ^ | June 23, 1999 | Senator James Inhofe

Posted on 09/25/2001 4:29:58 PM PDT by ChaseR

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 last
To: ChaseR
Nope, I don't think so! There's alot on this board to absorb!
201 posted on 10/16/2001 8:04:00 PM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Raise ya back a bump!
I call! Whatcha got? ;-)

202 posted on 10/16/2001 9:06:03 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

Comment #203 Removed by Moderator

Comment #204 Removed by Moderator

Comment #205 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
Thanks for the flag.
206 posted on 10/17/2001 9:59:49 AM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
"None of these commercial agreements can override the Canal Treaty.........."

The Canal Treaty does not override the Constitution of the U.S. Realistically speaking, the U.S. does have some say in this such as voiding the treaty. In times of war, we are not certain who is using those ports even if the Panamanian government does have "control". We do have some say in this. It seems to me that this "treaty" is being breached. Of course, the Chinese have dealings with the Panamanian government and are using this Canal to smuggle in drugs, prostitution, guns, ammunition, weapons. And of course the Chinese are masters at stealing and duplicating our technology. That is why when implementing treaty measures it is best to know who you are dealing with solely. Are we just dealing with Panama? Course not. We have just about every rogue nation to be concerned about!

207 posted on 10/17/2001 8:54:56 PM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

Comment #208 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
"The US Constitution does not state anywhere that the US owns the Panama Canal. There are no constitutional grounds for voiding a commercial agreement made by another sovereign state. If the triads are infiltrating the Panama Canal, then it is a law enforcement matter, which involves international cooperation in fighting organized crime."

True, the U.S. does not own the Panana Canal. What has my attention is that the U.S. has some treaty going on pertaining to the Canal. I agree that this has become an issue of organized crime. Like Title 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1961 and 1962 civilly and criminally. Moss v. Morgan Stanley, Inc., C.A. N.Y., 719 F.2d 5, 17.

Why not prosecute this matter. It is one way of severing the treaty.

209 posted on 10/18/2001 10:38:02 PM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
COMMUNIST SYMPATHIZER BLACK JADE - STILL THINKS READERS WILL TRUST HER. WON'T HAPPEN JADE - WE ALL KNOW OF YOUR STRONG COMMITMENT TO COMMUNISM:
sympathizer jade:
"For a realistic assessment of the dangers of the Hutchison-Whampoa contract, this poster on another thread has a good grasp of..."

Incorrect assumption...jade. No cigar again.

210 posted on 10/19/2001 5:50:03 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
"...the incredible but true story of the Clinton Administration's betrayal of national security and the scandalous coverup that continues as we speak."
211 posted on 10/19/2001 5:51:50 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

Comment #212 Removed by Moderator

To: ChaseR
bump to that!
213 posted on 10/19/2001 6:16:42 PM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"The truth is he always was a pinhead - with his brains in his trousers."

Right you are! Of course, Clinton could not resist being even more specific addressing his MTV audience . . .

214 posted on 10/25/2001 5:32:00 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky; backhoe; Mudboy Slim; Landru; Snow Bunny; Mercuria; KLT; ALOHA RONNIE; ashlee...
back at ya...
215 posted on 11/04/2001 2:26:18 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR; *clintonscandals
Indexed!
216 posted on 11/04/2001 2:34:24 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Thread XI
217 posted on 11/04/2001 2:44:57 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
I shall join you at the next thread, my patriotic FRiend...MUD
218 posted on 11/04/2001 10:42:57 PM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
bttt
219 posted on 03/28/2004 4:30:43 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Thanks for resurrecting this post. Worth re-reading.
220 posted on 03/28/2004 4:35:16 PM PST by backhoe (The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson