Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vrwcagent0498
Being in the medical field, I agree with your analysis, but I would rather think it "gross negligence". Doesn't homicide require some malicious intent beforehand?

I would think so. But perhaps other circumstances surrounding the case led the coroner to be far more draconian. Maybe there were previous complaints or previous events. I don't know that much.

But the bottom line for every ER is chest pain + shortness of breath + nausea = heart attack until proven otherwise. I cannot tell you how many thousands of times that axiom has been driven into my brain. I don't know how or why this woman was blown off, but it killed her. And that is inexcusable in any ER.

44 posted on 09/16/2006 10:02:28 PM PDT by 60Gunner (Leftism: preoperational egocentrism with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: 60Gunner

Interesting stuff. Just out of curiousity, how would you describe "shortness of breath" as related to a possible cardiac event V.S. "out of breath" as related to overweight and out of shape, or even someone who is reasonably fit and just ran a mile, and has to "catch their breath"? I've experienced both. The first from a pericardial effusion, which was sucessfully treated, and the latter from time to time from physical exertion beyond the limit we are normally used to.
What words would medical professionals use to describe the difference between the two? (And yes, I do have a reason for asking).


60 posted on 09/16/2006 10:22:52 PM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson