Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Typical Star..... Making a gun show the bad little nasty (constitutionally protected)hidden criminal activity that it isn't. Front page editorial is the standard of this paper.

Hopefully this liberal rag will get an editorial change after it review by the new owners....

1 posted on 03/26/2006 4:56:28 AM PST by jmq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: jmq

The author could have spared a whole lot of ink by just writing,"I don't know squat about guns or gun shows and I am terrified of them. I want to stampede the panicky and uninformed into agreeing with me,"

I've worked gun shows where there are lots of undercover Feds and uniformed police walking around and where most of the DEALERS AND ATTENDEES would drop a dime on you in a hot second if they thought you were selling weapons unlicensed. Nobody wants someone screwing it up for everybody else by making the leftist nitwits right.


2 posted on 03/26/2006 5:08:57 AM PST by Riley ("What color is the boathouse at Hereford?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
It’s just another weekend at a Kansas City gun show, where there is so much firepower at your fingertips that even some gun enthusiasts shake their heads in wonder.

What a bunch of crap.

3 posted on 03/26/2006 5:10:00 AM PST by SIDENET (Gonna shake it, gonna break it, let's forget it better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq

I wasn't aware that the SKS was a sniper rifle. I also like the part about the kid who shot someone had some friends that went to a gun show. Criminals steal guns from houses and cars during burglaries. The other three kids that got shot because they were trying to rob a drug dealer? This guy is retarded. Why don't we start outlawing lighters to prevent arson. It makes about as much sense.


5 posted on 03/26/2006 5:15:29 AM PST by willyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq

The problem is in enforcement & always were, & never were registration.

For some reason they never mention the "girlfriend"/marriage loophole, the homo-boyfriend/marriage loophole, or the liberal corruption & traitors "I have a law practice & I love Bill Clinton" loophole. Yep, I have seen married felons and other unprosecuted felons given the guns by judges.

A loophole is a law applied in courts, not an activity done at a show or privately in "competing harms".

Because once you have registration in place, only those going through the registration loophole will get the guns, & we all know who those hypocrite bureaucrats are.

And as far as felonies go, they can slap a felony on anyone they want to for any kind of petty offense, and remove a felony on any hard criminal or terrorist for any excuse. This is another selective gun restriction loophole, because the true loophole's not in the gunshows, but at the courthouse.

It's an effective dictatorship when the dictator does not have to make the hits himself, but instead relies on a confederacy of hitmen who get to be allowed to be corrupt in exchange.

This whole charade is a loophole on the second amendment in the first place, as it is a vote for the firm & irreversible "job security" of the establishment.

The checks and balances apply on the state which is supposed to support the American revolution & not oppose it.


6 posted on 03/26/2006 5:15:34 AM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq

The dreaded "gun show loophole". How about the dreaded criminal mind, who, just like the computer hacker has a mind full of ways around laws meant to protect the public. Instead of focusing on legal gun shows and legal law abiding citizens, gun shows are the culprit, cause you haven't got any criminal names to make an article about so you can get paid and eat. Such is the state of journalism.


7 posted on 03/26/2006 5:18:52 AM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
Maybe if the Left didn't go around complaining about the rights of criminals they wouldn't be on the streets going to gun shows.
8 posted on 03/26/2006 5:20:53 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
A known member of Hezbollah, for example, was convicted in 2001 in a federal court in Michigan for trying to smuggle guns into Lebanon. An undercover agent saw the man buy a weapon at a gun show without a background check.

Typical of gun haters, these two sentences have nothing to do with each other.

1. Sure, the Hezbolla dude went to Michigan to buy a gun to smuggle into Lebanon.

2. If the undercover agent didn't do anything about the gun buy, was it illegal?

3. The whole article keeps saying "unlicensed seller" when the correct term is "private seller." And that statement the everybody who sells guns needs a federal license is totally false,

10 posted on 03/26/2006 5:22:34 AM PST by CPOSharky (They don't even like each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
"....SKS sniper rifles. Armor-piercing bullets..."

Oh Judy, you ignorant slut.

Putting a scope on an SKS doesn't make it a 'sniper rifle'. Wait.. let me guess Judy, it was tricked out with a new 'scary looking' stock and maybe a bi-pod.

And Judy, any rifle larger than a .22 will pierce armor, body armor that is. So is that what you mean by 'Armor Piercing'?

Lastly JUDY, it's a M-A-G-A-Z-I-N-E, NOT a "clip".

I swear, it must be a union rule that every article about firearms be written by by some ditz reproterette. Sheesh, Judy, go back to fashion and cooking articles. Maybe you know a little about those topics.

Ps: Judy, "Machine Guns" are legal (subject to local laws), get over it.

11 posted on 03/26/2006 5:22:48 AM PST by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
Ah yes, The Kansas City Red Star. As usual,doing their very best to promote government by decree and those agencies that enjoy such abuse.

Come to Tulsa {Wannamacher's gun show, the BIG one} next weekend and meet some of the feds finest. Their table will be easy to find .
They will be the only ones there NOT having a good time.

12 posted on 03/26/2006 5:25:36 AM PST by labette (Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
Kansas City Star
14 posted on 03/26/2006 5:30:49 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq

It's anti-freedom articles like this that make me dream more and more that a better, freer United States, is a United States without a press.


16 posted on 03/26/2006 5:36:40 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
AK-47s. SKS sniper rifles. Armor-piercing bullets. Machine gun displays.

Lions, Tigers and Bears, Oh My !

What a wuss. I'm looking forward to the gunshow next weekend.

17 posted on 03/26/2006 5:36:47 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
“The ATF does not target gun shows...Marquardt said.

Liar!

18 posted on 03/26/2006 5:37:58 AM PST by sausageseller (Look out for the jackbooted spelling police. There! Everywhere!(revised cause the "man" accosted me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
“I think the average person would be in awe at what’s all legal now,”

I'm average, maybe even a little below average, but the only thing that awes me is stupid officials with below average intelligence.

Think I'll go SHOOT some clays this morning.....

26 posted on 03/26/2006 5:57:45 AM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
The KC (red) Star worries about "assault rifles", yet what is an "assault rifle", exactly, except a boogyman created by the media? In reality, they are firearms that just look too intimidating, too black, or just too ugly. I doubt that the reporter was careful to understand the legal definition of what makes a legal rifle into a legal "assault" rifle. For example, I challenge the reporter to tell me which of the following is an "assault rifle" and which is not:

Not and Assault Rifle

So-called

For extra credit, exactly what feature(s) that can easily be seen tip the scale, making the otherwise legal non-assault rifle, into one that the federal government banned for 10 years?

Of course, libs love the technical points of the law when it is in their favor, but call those points "technicalities" when they are not. The above extra credit question could be rewritten as:

For extra credit, exactly that feature(s) that can be easily seen tip the scale by which the maker of a rifle that qualified to be banned is not banned?

27 posted on 03/26/2006 6:00:48 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq

“I don’t see how that can be legal,” one man remarked to a friend as he pointed toward a Bushmaster assault rifle — the kind of weapon used in the 2002 sniper spree that left 10 persons dead in Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia.

This statement's more loaded than the P99 in my dresser.


29 posted on 03/26/2006 6:07:09 AM PST by 03A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
I see the author of this article can't refrain from the use of hyperbole and misinformation.

Assault rifles were displayed for sale

Assault Rifles are selective fire. So, were these true Assault Rifles, or is Judy L. Thomas a liar?

SKS sniper rifles.

Well, considering the fact that the 7.62x39 cartridge is less than half as powerful as the .30-06, it would be pi$$ poor choice for a "sniper" rifle.

Over the last couple of years, I've seen more and more articles, in which scoped hunting rifles are referred to as "sniper rifles".

This, of course, is S.O.P. for anti-gunners. Demonize the firearm first, then scream to have it banned. (This tactic has worked - to a degree - with so-called "assault weapons".)

31 posted on 03/26/2006 6:13:41 AM PST by holymoly (Dick DeVos for MI Governor: http://www.devosforgovernor.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq

More made-up crapola from the dinosaur media.


33 posted on 03/26/2006 6:17:08 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: g'nad; Overtaxed

An amusing read from our, as always, amusing Kansas City RED Star. Remember April 15 is National Buy A Gun Day.


42 posted on 03/26/2006 6:35:47 AM PST by osagebowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmq
The idea that street thugs get their firearms at gun shows is worse than laughable, it is insulting to the good and law-abiding Americans who do frequent gun shows.

This article reeks.

47 posted on 03/26/2006 7:08:56 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson