Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SheLion

"Not even the public servants such as police officers or firemen can enjoy a legal cigarette as long as they hold the position of Street Saviors. They are now "owned by the state." It's funny though, how they are still allowed to consume alcohol."

Are firemen prohibited from breathing all smoke? Are they forbidden to enter burning buildings? How can they prove what smoke that entered the lungs "caused" the work related illness?


7 posted on 06/11/2004 9:41:09 AM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: CSM
Are firemen prohibited from breathing all smoke? Are they forbidden to enter burning buildings? How can they prove what smoke that entered the lungs "caused" the work related illness?

This article has brought me to my knees, CSM. I am totally devestated. I am so afraid for our Country and what is becoming of it.

I KNEW the stink from MASS would rub off. And it did......to NY and Maine. How is VT doing and NH???

12 posted on 06/11/2004 9:50:10 AM PDT by SheLion (Don Imus is voting for FnKerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CSM
Are firemen prohibited from breathing all smoke? Are they forbidden to enter burning buildings? How can they prove what smoke that entered the lungs "caused" the work related illness?

This makes no sense. But what sense can we find from anything the lawmakers put down?

I guess when you work for the state..........your life is no longer your own.

13 posted on 06/11/2004 9:51:39 AM PDT by SheLion (Don Imus is voting for FnKerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: CSM

"Are firemen prohibited from breathing all smoke? Are they forbidden to enter burning buildings? How can they prove what smoke that entered the lungs "caused" the work related illness?"

That's exactly the point. Firemen fought for the right to claim under their worker's disability plans to be covered for lung diseases that might have been caused by smoke inhalation on the job. In previous cases where they tried for this, it was often pointed out that these guys were also smokers and thus their lung diseases might have been caused by that. I would guess that some state or municipality lost on a case like this, and thus implemented these no-smoking rules for their firemen so that they wouldn't be on the hook for disability payments to smokers with lung diseases caused by smoking. The article above aluded to this.


44 posted on 06/11/2004 1:31:47 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson