To: CyberCowboy777
The fact that many nonsmokers are against the attack on private property should make this point clear.>Maybe you are right, they are not addicted and just because they need numerous cigarette breaks while working when it comes to dinner out they really don't think about a cigarette. In fact they only care about property rights and not about having their next cigarette. But don't you think its a bit odd that this is the only property right issue smokers as a group protest ?
To: VRWC_minion
Odd? When it's aimed directly at them? If people were shooting bullets at smokers instead of regulations, you'd expect them to notice and take exception, but since it's only regulations, they should ignore it?
When it mentions SMOKERS specifically, it's odd that they notice? Where are you from? Pluto, or the other one?
815 posted on
06/04/2004 1:44:42 PM PDT by
Judith Anne
(HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
To: VRWC_minion
Like helmet laws and motorcycle riders?
It really is too bad that it takes an attack on the individual before he/she stands up for all our rights. Too easy to sit on the sidelines when your particular freedom is not threatened.
To: VRWC_minion
But don't you think its a bit odd that this is the only property right issue smokers as a group protest ? You don't know how wrong you are.
But since you make the assertion, please backit up.
834 posted on
06/04/2004 2:35:01 PM PDT by
Gabz
(Ted Kennedy has killed more people than all SHS combined.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson