Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Judith Anne
No proof, that's why. Statistics are NOT proof.

The lung photos posted were not statistics. The people that died from smoking became statistics.

149 posted on 06/02/2004 11:08:14 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: cinFLA

Do you know the percentage of non-smokers from non-smoking households who got lung cancer?

Do you know the percentage of smokers who ever get lung cancer?

Why would a REAL scientist rely on statistics, instead of doing REAL science?

Why does one governor want to raise taxes on smoking to help her state's school budget?

Where do you get off regulating private legal behavior and taxing it to the skies? Why don't you try to have it banned, if it's such a health problem? Why aren't you going after the fast-food joints as well? The number of people dying from obesity is now equal to the number of people dying from so-called smoke related illnesses, and will soon surpass them. Why aren't you going after fatties, with their increased levels of heart disease, diabetes, joint disease, circulatory illnesses, BREATHING DIFFICULTIES, etc? Those are clear evidentiary links!


155 posted on 06/02/2004 11:18:45 AM PDT by Judith Anne (HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: cinFLA
Lies, Damn lies and Statistics.
241 posted on 06/02/2004 1:09:20 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson