Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYCVirago
The examples you mention, aside from maybe alcoholism, are all the results of unhealthy choices during the course of living a life (eating, sex). Smoking, OTOH, is something that is totally unnecessary. My concern was that conservatives would use the right to personal freedom to extol smoking, which is harmful to the person actually smoking as well as those around them. I don't want more government intrusion in my life, but as I said, if it helps even one person quit or not start or not be affected by SHS for x amount of time, it's a good thing.
151 posted on 04/03/2004 10:45:13 AM PST by Reddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: Reddy
I don't want more government intrusion in my life, but as I said, if it helps even one person quit or not start or not be affected by SHS for x amount of time, it's a good thing.

You're obviously entitled to your opinion, but you're using the rationale that liberals say about virtually every proposal they want, particularly the part about how "if it helps even one person."

156 posted on 04/03/2004 11:53:43 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson