Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Cherokee Nation Allied Themselves With the Confederate States of America in 1861
Lew Rockwell.com ^ | January 7, 2004 | Leonard M. Scruggs

Posted on 01/07/2004 7:12:30 AM PST by Aurelius

Many have no doubt heard of the valor of the Cherokee warriors under the command of Brigadier General Stand Watie in the West and of Thomas’ famous North Carolina Legion in the East during the War for Southern Independence from 1861 to 1865. But why did the Cherokees and their brethren, the Creeks, Seminoles, Choctaws, and Chickasaws determine to make common cause with the Confederate South against the Northern Union? To know their reasons is very instructive as to the issues underlying that tragic war. Most Americans have been propagandized rather than educated in the causes of the war, all this to justify the perpetrators and victors. Considering the Cherokee view uncovers much truth buried by decades of politically correct propaganda and allows a broader and truer perspective.

On August 21, 1861, the Cherokee Nation by a General Convention at Tahlequah (in Oklahoma) declared its common cause with the Confederate States against the Northern Union. A treaty was concluded on October 7th between the Confederate States and the Cherokee Nation, and on October 9th, John Ross, the Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation called into session the Cherokee National Committee and National Council to approve and implement that treaty and a future course of action.

The Cherokees had at first considerable consternation over the growing conflict and desired to remain neutral. They had much common economy and contact with their Confederate neighbors, but their treaties were with the government of the United States.

The Northern conduct of the war against their neighbors, strong repression of Northern political dissent, and the roughshod trampling of the U. S Constitution under the new regime and political powers in Washington soon changed their thinking.

The Cherokee were perhaps the best educated and literate of the American Indian Tribes. They were also among the most Christian. Learning and wisdom were highly esteemed. They revered the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution as particularly important guarantors of their rights and freedoms. It is not surprising then that on October 28, 1861, the National Council issued a Declaration by the People of the Cherokee Nation of the Causes Which Have Impelled them to Unite Their Fortunes With Those of the Confederate States of America.

The introductory words of this declaration strongly resembled the 1776 Declaration of Independence:

"When circumstances beyond their control compel one people to sever the ties which have long existed between them and another state or confederacy, and to contract new alliances and establish new relations for the security of their rights and liberties, it is fit that they should publicly declare the reasons by which their action is justified."

In the next paragraphs of their declaration the Cherokee Council noted their faithful adherence to their treaties with the United States in the past and how they had faithfully attempted neutrality until the present. But the seventh paragraph begins to delineate their alarm with Northern aggression and sympathy with the South:

"But Providence rules the destinies of nations, and events, by inexorable necessity, overrule human resolutions."

Comparing the relatively limited objectives and defensive nature of the Southern cause in contrast to the aggressive actions of the North they remarked of the Confederate States:

"Disclaiming any intention to invade the Northern States, they sought only to repel the invaders from their own soil and to secure the right of governing themselves. They claimed only the privilege asserted in the Declaration of American Independence, and on which the right of Northern States themselves to self-government is formed, and altering their form of government when it became no longer tolerable and establishing new forms for the security of their liberties."

The next paragraph noted the orderly and democratic process by which each of the Confederate States seceded. This was without violence or coercion and nowhere were liberties abridged or civilian courts and authorities made subordinate to the military. Also noted was the growing unity and success of the South against Northern aggression. The following or ninth paragraph contrasts this with ruthless and totalitarian trends in the North:

"But in the Northern States the Cherokee people saw with alarm a violated constitution, all civil liberty put in peril, and all rules of civilized warfare and the dictates of common humanity and decency unhesitatingly disregarded. In the states which still adhered to the Union a military despotism had displaced civilian power and the laws became silent with arms. Free speech and almost free thought became a crime. The right of habeas corpus, guaranteed by the constitution, disappeared at the nod of a Secretary of State or a general of the lowest grade. The mandate of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was at naught by the military power and this outrage on common right approved by a President sworn to support the constitution. War on the largest scale was waged, and the immense bodies of troops called into the field in the absence of any warranting it under the pretense of suppressing unlawful combination of men."

The tenth paragraph continues the indictment of the Northern political party in power and the conduct of the Union Armies:

"The humanities of war, which even barbarians respect, were no longer thought worthy to be observed. Foreign mercenaries and the scum of the cities and the inmates of prisons were enlisted and organized into brigades and sent into Southern States to aid in subjugating a people struggling for freedom, to burn, to plunder, and to commit the basest of outrages on the women; while the heels of armed tyranny trod upon the necks of Maryland and Missouri, and men of the highest character and position were incarcerated upon suspicion without process of law, in jails, forts, and prison ships, and even women were imprisoned by the arbitrary order of a President and Cabinet Ministers; while the press ceased to be free, and the publication of newspapers was suspended and their issues seized and destroyed; the officers and men taken prisoners in the battles were allowed to remain in captivity by the refusal of the Government to consent to an exchange of prisoners; as they had left their dead on more than one field of battle that had witnessed their defeat, to be buried and their wounded to be cared for by southern hands."

The eleventh paragraph of the Cherokee declaration is a fairly concise summary of their grievances against the political powers now presiding over a new U. S. Government:

"Whatever causes the Cherokee people may have had in the past to complain of some of the southern states, they cannot but feel that their interests and destiny are inseparably connected to those of the south. The war now waging is a war of Northern cupidity and fanaticism against the institution of African servitude; against the commercial freedom of the south, and against the political freedom of the states, and its objects are to annihilate the sovereignty of those states and utterly change the nature of the general government."

The Cherokees felt they had been faithful and loyal to their treaties with the United States, but now perceived that the relationship was not reciprocal and that their very existence as a people was threatened. They had also witnessed the recent exploitation of the properties and rights of Indian tribes in Kansas, Nebraska, and Oregon, and feared that they, too, might soon become victims of Northern rapacity. Therefore, they were compelled to abrogate those treaties in defense of their people, lands, and rights. They felt the Union had already made war on them by their actions.

Finally, appealing to their inalienable right to self-defense and self-determination as a free people, they concluded their declaration with the following words:

"Obeying the dictates of prudence and providing for the general safety and welfare, confident of the rectitude of their intentions and true to their obligations to duty and honor, they accept the issue thus forced upon them, unite their fortunes now and forever with the Confederate States, and take up arms for the common cause, and with entire confidence of the justice of that cause and with a firm reliance upon Divine Providence, will resolutely abide the consequences.

The Cherokees were true to their words. The last shot fired in the war east of the Mississippi was May 6, 1865. This was in an engagement at White Sulphur Springs, near Waynesville, North Carolina, of part of Thomas’ Legion against Kirk’s infamous Union raiders that had wreaked a murderous terrorism and destruction on the civilian population of Western North Carolina. Col. William H. Thomas’ Legion was originally predominantly Cherokee, but had also accrued a large number of North Carolina mountain men. On June 23, 1865, in what was the last land battle of the war, Confederate Brigadier General and Cherokee Chief, Stand Watie, finally surrendered his predominantly Cherokee, Oklahoma Indian force to the Union.

The issues as the Cherokees saw them were 1) self-defense against Northern aggression, both for themselves and their fellow Confederates, 2) the right of self-determination by a free people, 3) protection of their heritage, 4) preservation of their political rights under a constitutional government of law 5) a strong desire to retain the principles of limited government and decentralized power guaranteed by the Constitution, 6) protection of their economic rights and welfare, 7) dismay at the despotism of the party and leaders now in command of the U. S. Government, 8) dismay at the ruthless disregard of commonly accepted rules of warfare by the Union, especially their treatment of civilians and non-combatants, 9) a fear of economic exploitation by corrupt politicians and their supporters based on observed past experience, and 10) alarm at the self-righteous and extreme, punitive, and vengeful pronouncements on the slavery issue voiced by the radical abolitionists and supported by many Northern politicians, journalists, social, and religious (mostly Unitarian) leaders. It should be noted here that some of the Cherokees owned slaves, but the practice was not extensive.

The Cherokee Declaration of October 1861 uncovers a far more complex set of "Civil War" issues than most Americans have been taught. Rediscovered truth is not always welcome. Indeed some of the issues here are so distressing that the general academic, media, and public reaction is to rebury them or shout them down as politically incorrect.

The notion that slavery was the only real or even principal cause of the war is very politically correct and widely held, but historically ignorant. It has served, however, as a convenient ex post facto justification for the war and its conduct. Slavery was an issue, and it was related to many other issues, but it was by no means the only issue, or even the most important underlying issue. It was not even an issue in the way most people think of it. Only about 25% of Southern households owned slaves. For most people, North and South, the slavery issue was not so much whether to keep it or not, but how to phase it out without causing economic and social disruption and disaster. Unfortunately the Southern and Cherokee fear of the radical abolitionists turned out to be well founded.

After the Reconstruction Act was passed in 1867 the radical abolitionists and radical Republicans were able to issue in a shameful era of politically punitive and economically exploitive oppression in the South, the results of which lasted many years, and even today are not yet completely erased.

The Cherokee were and are a remarkable people who have impacted the American heritage far beyond their numbers. We can be especially grateful that they made a well thought out and articulate declaration for supporting and joining the Confederate cause in 1861.

PRINCIPAL REFERENCES:

Emmett Starr, History of the Cherokee Indians, published by the Warden Company, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 1921. Reprinted by Kraus Reprint Company, Millwood, New York, 1977.

Hattie Caldwell Davis, Civil War Letters and Memories from the Great Smoky Mountains, Second Edition published by the author, Maggie Valley, NC, 1999.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americanindians; dixie; dixielist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-357 next last
To: stand watie
Good quote, hadn't seen that one before.
81 posted on 01/07/2004 10:22:41 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I knew you would know that, T-C!
82 posted on 01/07/2004 10:23:07 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Agnes Heep
... but we always try to right our wrongs, ...

I am afraid that you have it turned around. In this case it was the wronging of a right.

83 posted on 01/07/2004 10:24:56 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: stand watie; stainlessbanner
I don't know why I didn't look this up first ... James Robertson says (p. 191-2) that Gen. Jackson personally owned two slaves, both of whom he purchased because they asked him to!

"Albert was the first. He had come to Jackson and begged to be purchased. In return, Albert promised to get a job and obtain his freedom through reimbursement to Jackson. The major agreed. For awhile, Albert was a waiter in one of the Lexington hotels. He also worked occasionally at Rockbridge Alum Springs. Jackson checked on him regularly to ensure that all was going well. During the 1858-1860 period, Jackson rented Albert to VMI for $120 annually."

"The second slave Jackson acquired was Amy, who was closest to Jackson's heart. Around 1855, the forty-year-old woman was on the verge of being sold at public auction when she too pled with Jackson to become his property. Jackson bought the servant and found her a position "in a good Christian family." There she remained until the Jackson's acquired their home. Amy thereupon came to work at the Jackson residence."

(Sourcing for these facts is not given; the only footnote refers to a letter of Mrs. Jackson's.)

Other slaves who were part of the Jackson household were gifts from Anna's family, and therefore owned either by her or by her father, if he didn't legally pass title.
84 posted on 01/07/2004 10:32:57 AM PST by Tax-chick (I reserve the right to disclaim all January 2004 posts after the BABY is born!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
My son, Thomas Jackson, has recently announced a religious vocation and says he's going to be Pope! You heard it here first!
85 posted on 01/07/2004 10:34:07 AM PST by Tax-chick (I reserve the right to disclaim all January 2004 posts after the BABY is born!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Well ? Im a Red-Neck. Recon between all the Gun Control & Welfair programs , HUD and prison over crowding? Im not sure we made the right choice back in them days.
Just between my fellow Red-Neck & Red-Skin Brothers.
86 posted on 01/07/2004 10:38:15 AM PST by Maverick88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
According to his wife, he did... now who are you going to believe?
87 posted on 01/07/2004 11:00:50 AM PST by carton253 (It's time to draw your sword and throw away the scabbard... General TJ Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Did you name your son after Jackson? If so...how cool!
88 posted on 01/07/2004 11:01:41 AM PST by carton253 (It's time to draw your sword and throw away the scabbard... General TJ Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: gopheraj
"Didnt' matter whether it was man, woman or child either."

99.99% of all Americnas are completely oblivious to the attempted genocide on native American Indians.

They were viewed not as humans, but as being one step above a range animal, such as a buffalo.

89 posted on 01/07/2004 11:03:26 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I have a book called "We Knew Stonewall," which has contributions from numerous sources. In this book, the author quotes Anna Morrison extensively where she states that Jackson owned slaves...

Jackson paid $150 for the services of his cook Jim Lewis during the war. There is much ambiguity whether the $150 was the price to purchase Jim from his owner, or if those were Jim's wages.

90 posted on 01/07/2004 11:06:56 AM PST by carton253 (It's time to draw your sword and throw away the scabbard... General TJ Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
i want them out of our lives & our house to be left alone. take nothing from us & give us nothing either. especially keep their "gun control" measures, high taxes,social programs,welfare,busing,murder of the unborn,etc.

Bump.

91 posted on 01/07/2004 11:19:29 AM PST by 4CJ (Dialing 911 doesn't stop a crime - a .45 does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: carton253; Tax-chick
The tradition continues!
92 posted on 01/07/2004 11:22:42 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Cherokee bump again!! Thanks Stainless.
93 posted on 01/07/2004 11:37:10 AM PST by SCDogPapa (In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
"the hairy faces came among us and made us many promises. more promises than there are leaves on all the trees. but of all the promises they made, they kept just one. they said they would take our land away!"

Wasn't that line used by the Chief in the movie "The Outlaw Josie Wales."?

94 posted on 01/07/2004 12:01:27 PM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Very good piece.
95 posted on 01/07/2004 12:09:32 PM PST by sweetliberty (Even the smallest person can change the course of the future. - (LOTR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
No Dingbat, The Trail of Tears in 1838 predated the civil war by more than 20 years!
96 posted on 01/07/2004 12:10:11 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Who wrote the Indian declaration? It seems to have been written in large part with respect to what the federal government was doing in Missouri about the time that it was written, and also to the jailings in the East.
97 posted on 01/07/2004 12:11:34 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
"I just read an excellent book about the War in North Carolina, "Bushwhackers!"

Well, I'll be! Who'd have thought that Bush was even responsible for that war? < /sarcasm >

98 posted on 01/07/2004 12:18:05 PM PST by sweetliberty (Even the smallest person can change the course of the future. - (LOTR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
When Registration was ordered, my great grandfather (Parker) did not go into the reservation to register. Had he done so, none of his descendents would be here now to tell the story.

As a general proposition, registration demands are almost always an official announcement that the government intends to screw you. Consider the draft and (for better reasons) sex offenders.

No wonder gun owners are so goosey about the idea of firearms registration.

99 posted on 01/07/2004 12:18:11 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
No wonder gun owners are so goosey about the idea of firearms registration.

I lost my guns.

Honest. ;o)

100 posted on 01/07/2004 12:22:16 PM PST by 4CJ (Dialing 911 doesn't stop a crime - a .45 does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-357 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson