Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

 
Welcome to our new enlightened society!

Thank You Liberals!
Thank You Libertarians!
Thank You Moderates!
Thank You Progressives!
Thank You Morons!!!!!


1 posted on 11/07/2003 12:35:43 PM PST by carlo3b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: carlo3b
INTREP - JUDICIAL ANARCHY
2 posted on 11/07/2003 12:37:04 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Ok everything is OK./sarcasm
3 posted on 11/07/2003 12:38:10 PM PST by bmwcyle (Hillary's election to President will start a civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Maybe the emphasis should have been on "perversion" rather than "adultery." This would not just cover the present example but also things like sex with the family dog (barf...)
4 posted on 11/07/2003 12:38:43 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck ("Across this great nation people pray -- do not put out her flame" -- DFU. Go Godsquad!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Unbelievable. Define adultery. Define marital unfaithfulness.
6 posted on 11/07/2003 12:39:43 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
The NH Supreme Court is a collective of busy-body idiots.
8 posted on 11/07/2003 12:41:46 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("We happy because when we switch on the TV you never see Saddam Hussein. That's a big happy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
"We have now sunk to a depth at which re-statement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men."

-- George Orwell
10 posted on 11/07/2003 12:42:17 PM PST by Joe Republc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
And yet in every other aspect the sodomites want the same acknowledgments as heterosexual couples

Who doesn't believe we are living in the end times?

11 posted on 11/07/2003 12:43:23 PM PST by apackof2 (Watch and pray till you see Him coming, no one knows the hour or the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Well.. according to someone very close to me, vaginal penile penetration isn't sex as long as the man does not reach climax.
13 posted on 11/07/2003 12:48:25 PM PST by Darksheare (DemUn, a good excuse to throw Holy Water on liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
NH divorce law states that he comes out on top if she engages in "adultry." In other NH laws, adultry is defined as "sexual intercourse." Maybe the court just took the standard definition of sexual intercourse, which is "coitus," and that doesn't happen in lesbian sex.

In that case, you don't have judicial activism because according to the law she didn't commit adultry. Thus judges were being judicially conservative because they didn't effectively rewrite the law to include what it doesn't explicitly include as written. It's up to the legislature to close this rediculous loophole by broadly defining adultry in the divorce law.

16 posted on 11/07/2003 12:53:04 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
It totally depends on what the definition of is ... is.
17 posted on 11/07/2003 12:53:11 PM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Maybe the judges were gay.. Maybe they they are naked beneath their robes, who knows??
19 posted on 11/07/2003 12:54:10 PM PST by a_Turk (Threatened by shadows at night, and exposed in the light....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Last winter, there was an exodus of gays leaving N. California after selling their homes at a good profit.

We couldn't understand why they would go Vermont, New Hampshire or Maine. None of them would really say why they went back to one of these three states.

Since then with the pro gay laws passed by the legislators, the pro gay decisions by the courts, the Gay Bishop and other sanctioned pro gay behavior, we now understand that this has been in the works for a long time.
24 posted on 11/07/2003 12:57:33 PM PST by Grampa Dave ("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
The more we march down this path of exposing the legal institution and definition of marriage to such nonsense, the more harm we do to women and children. But then, the feminists can't see that, as they work hard for such redefinitions around legal concepts like rape, marriage, and life. Idiots.
26 posted on 11/07/2003 12:59:30 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ahadams2; carlo3b; Dr. Eckleburg; scripter; EdReform; George W. Bush; aristeides; P-Marlowe
The majority determined that the definition of adultery requires sexual intercourse. The judges who disagreed said adultery should be defined more broadly to include other extramarital sexual activity.

Aha, now you can let the ecusa know that bishop vicki-gene was not living in sin. Unbelievable.

Script & Dr.E, if female/female cannot be adultery because it isn't sexual intercourse, then sexual intercourse must = male/female coitus. Therefore, male to male is also not sexual intercourse seeing that it is lacking exactly one vagina. Two observations: (1) If you cannot commit adultery then you obviously cannot be married; (2) If you cannot be having sexual intercourse, then the best description of this act is as it's always been....sodomy.

29 posted on 11/07/2003 1:03:26 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Strictly speaking I guess the judges are right.

But what is she was wearing a strap-on...would that count?

This is one weird case
30 posted on 11/07/2003 1:04:38 PM PST by Masked Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
So, just because the actual definition of a word isn't what you believe it should be, everybody else is an idiot?

adultery: voluntary sexual intercourse between a married and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband.

31 posted on 11/07/2003 1:05:57 PM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Why aren't lesbians decrying this as hate-mongering and oppressive? The court just said that gay women literally can't have "sex" with each other, yet gay men can ("intercourse"). This is clearly a gender bias!
34 posted on 11/07/2003 1:13:21 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Perhaps taking their lead from the Episcopal church. No adultery in gayness therein either.
35 posted on 11/07/2003 1:23:05 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Little Bill
Sure you don't wanna come back down to Taxachusetts?
36 posted on 11/07/2003 1:27:08 PM PST by ElectricStrawberry (Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Any form of sex with anyone other than your spouse is adultery!Besides,what does a da*n judge know about sex other than how to scr*w the one standing in front of him???
39 posted on 11/07/2003 1:33:43 PM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson