Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FReeper Foxhole Remembers The Vera Cruz Incident (4/22/1914) - Sep. 28th, 2003
exwar.org ^

Posted on 09/28/2003 12:00:34 AM PDT by SAMWolf

U.S. Military History, Current Events and Veterans Issues

Where Duty, Honor and Country
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.

Our Mission:

The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans.

In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support.

The FReeper Foxhole hopes to share with it's readers an open forum where we can learn about and discuss military history, military news and other topics of concern or interest to our readers be they Veteran's, Current Duty or anyone interested in what we have to offer.

If the Foxhole makes someone appreciate, even a little, what others have sacrificed for us, then it has accomplished one of it's missions.

We hope the Foxhole in some small way helps us to remember and honor those who came before us.

To read previous Foxhole threads or
to add the Foxhole to your sidebar,
click on the books below.

1914 - U.S. landing at Vera Cruz


In 1914, a group led by General Victoriano Huerta had seized power by murdering Mexico's first revolutionary president, Francisco Madero. Enraged by Huerta's bloody coup, the general's removal became a central tenet of U.S. president Woodrow Wilson's hemispheric policy. Wilson refused to recognize the new Mexican government and removed a previously imposed arms embargo on the Mexican combatants, which allowed weapons to flow to Huerta's constitutionalist foes. He also waited for a pretext for U.S. intervention.


President Woodrow Wilson


That came in early April 1914, when Mexican soldiers temporarily detained a small group of U.S. sailors in the eastern oil port of Tampico, where U.S. and European warships had gathered to guard their nation's interests and citizens in the city. Mexican officials ordered the sailors released and offered their apologies to the U.S. government and Rear Admiral Henry Mayo, commander of the U.S. Navy forces in the area. Wilson and Mayo would have none of it, however, and demanded that the city's garrison hoist the U.S. flag and fire a 21-gun salute to atone for the "insult" to U.S. honor. Huerta, seeing such a move as political suicide, refused.

This gave Wilson the opening to intervene for which he had been waiting. In the following days and weeks, widely scattered American naval forces converged on both coasts of Mexico, with an emphasis on the Gulf ports of Tampico and Vera Cruz. This deployment included the largest concentration of Marine Corps units to date - approximately half of the service's active strength of 10,000 men would ultimately take part.

Marine involvement predated the Tampico incident. As early as January 1914, a battalion under Major Smedley Butler had been ordered to move from Panama, where they had been deployed, to support Navy forces maintaining an American presence off the coast Mexico. In March, the fixed-defense battalion from the Marine Corp's Advanced Base Force (ABF) - which had remained on the U.S. Gulf Coast after exercises on Culebra island earlier in the year - reformed as four rifle companies and also sailed for Vera Cruz. Arriving on 9 March on the transport Prairie, Lieutenant Colonel Wendell Neville's unit came under the control of the naval commander off Vera Cruz, Rear Admiral Frank F. Fletcher.

The deployment process quickened after Wilson's cabinet met on 14 April to discuss the continuing Mexican "crisis." Secretary of the Navy Josephus Daniels ordered the commander of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet, Rear Admiral Charles Badger, to proceed to Mexican waters with all of his available battleships. In the ensuing three days, seven of these warships sortied from east coast ports and the Caribbean. On board were approximately 1,000 Marines serving in shipboard detachments. They were formed into a landing force under Badger's fleet Marine officer, Major Albertus Catlin. Meanwhile, the commander of the Advanced Base Force brigade, Colonel John Lejeune, was ordered to embark on board the transport Hancock with his staff and the remainder of his force and sail from New Orleans to Tampico.


General Victoriano Huerta


Wilson and his advisors originally planned to launch the U.S. intervention in Tampico. However, naval officers and Secretary Daniels pointed out that while hydrographic conditions around that city would hinder the fleet's ability to support a landing, there was no such problem at Vera Cruz. Moreover, U.S. intelligence indicated that a German steamer loaded with weapons and ammunition for General Huerta's forces was on its way to the latter port. For this reason, Badger's task force and the Marine units at or enroute to Tampico were ordered to Vera Cruz.

Secretary Daniels's intervention order reached Rear Admiral Fletcher early on the morning of 21 April. Acting quickly, Fletcher had a landing party of sailors and Marines assembled for an assault before noon. The latter included Lieutenant Colonel Neville's battalion, buttressed by Marines from the battleships Florida and Utah. The landing force, which was commanded by Florida's commanding officer, Captain William Rush, went ashore in ships' boats.

For their part, the Marines' objectives were to secure the port facilities and customs house. Neither they nor Fletcher expected much effective opposition to the operation, but local Mexican commanders did move small groups of federal soldiers, local militia, and even criminal released from jail to the waterfront area. These polyglot forces did not oppose the initial landing, but opened fire as the Marines and sailors moved off of the wharves.

Occupying rooftops and moving building to building, the Marines cleared their area of scattered snipers and irregular fighters with relative ease. By the evening of the 21st, they had seized their objectives and moved to the edge of the city. However, they were forced to pull back upon learning that Mexican defenders had stalled the bluejackets in their sector.


USS Michigan (BB-27)
Taking on coal from a Navy collier, while off Vera Cruz, Mexico, in April-June 1914.
Note ship's band atop Turret # 2, playing to encourage the crewmen at work moving coal.


The fighting in and around the port continued into the next day. Casualties among the Navy landing force climbed when sailors stumbled into an ambush. Naval gunfire was called into play to deal with some particularly stubborn Mexican positions. U.S. reinforcements continued to go ashore, until the size of the landing force grew to more than 6,000 men.

The rapid-fire arrival of Marine reinforcements were particularly important in buttressing the landing force during the early days of the expedition. The earliest arrivals included Butler's battalion, which deployed on the night of the 21st from the cruiser Chester. Once ashore, it was absorbed into Neville's command, in time to engage in sporadic night-time street fighting. Catlin's battalion, which arrived at dawn on the 22nd on Admiral Badger's battleships, also fell under Neville's command after landing. The transport Hancock discharged the Advanced Base Force leadership and the ABF's mobile-defense battalion later that morning, at which point all the Marine Corps units in Vera Cruz were consolidated into a provisional brigade under Colonel Lejeune.

Back in the United States, the Marines also formed another battalion using troops drawn from ten different barracks at east coast naval bases. These Marines and their gear began loading on the chartered steamship Morro Castle on the 21st, and sailed from Philadelphia Naval Base on 23 April. Six days later, they too joined Lejeune's command, although by that time serious Mexican resistance was over.


The USS Utah's battalion being towed ashore under small arms fire, early in the afternoon of 21 April 1914, during the U.S. intervention at Vera Cruz.
The fort of San Juan de Ulua is in the background, with a possible Mexican Government steamer moored nearby


The Navy also added to the overwhelming strength of its supporting forces off Vera Cruz. Eight additional battleships joined Badger's original force, along with several key auxiliary ships, including a hospital ship. The Navy also conducted a show of force off Mexico's west coast. Eight cruisers, later joined by two battleships, operated off the ports of Acapulco, Mazatlan, and Guymas. Marines were also part of this naval effort - Colonel Joseph Pendleton had formed a Marine battalion from west coast barracks that deployed on the battleships and a collier.

The possibility existed that the Vera Cruz foray would turn into a larger-scale, longer-term campaign. Consequently, the Army also prepared a brigade of its troops for deployment from Galveston, Texas on board three of the service's own transports. However, the cabinet did not give the Army permission to deploy until after Rear Admiral Badger requested more troops. Moreover, much to his chagrin, the Army commander, Brigadier General Frederic Funston, found that he could not move all his equipment on the three ships, and thus had to charter two additional steamers. Consequently, his troops did not disembark at Vera Cruz until 29 April.

Once there, however, Brigadier General Funston became the senior U.S. officer ashore. He requested that a unified Army-Marine Corps command be formed under his command, which caused consternation in both the Marine and Navy ranks. The Navy, which also had forces on the ground, argued that its commanders should retain control of the Marines. Eventually, Funston, Lejeune, and the Navy reached agreement - seconded by the White House - that the sailors and Marines attached to ships' companies would return to the warships, and the remaining Marines - who on 4 May would come under the command of yet another officer, Colonel L.W.T. Waller - would operate under Army control.

This arrangement would stand for the next eight months as the Wilson administration continued to pressure the Mexican government. The president did achieve one of his key goals when General Huerta resigned office and fled in July 1914. Once Huerta was gone, Wilson's interest in continuing the expedition gradually waned. Overall, the Vera Cruz landing had gone relatively smoothly for the Navy and Marine Corps. Nevertheless, it had exposed several shortcomings. For example, the operation had highlighted a lack of sophisticated combat skills among the Navy landing parties. The sailors had been particularly unprepared for urban combat - a fact that led to a gradual reduction in the use of large naval landing parties.


Men of the USS Michigan (BB-27) Battalion on the outskirts of Vera Cruz, circa late April 1914.
They are wearing dyed "Whites" and are armed with a Colt M1895 machine gun and M1903 rifles. Note the colorful bandannas worn by two of these men..


For their part, the Marines found that their success at Vera Cruz had occurred despite some well-known, continuing problems. For one thing, their lift - both strategic and tactical - was still heavily constrained. Beyond Prairie and Hancock, which left much to be desired as transports, the Marines had no dedicated sealift. Unable to move units as a coherent whole, Marine commanders instead were forced to create provisional units "on the fly" from detachments on Navy warships who had not trained, planned, or even come ashore together. Once on the ground in Mexico, the Marines also found themselves with little tactical mobility, which would have been a serious impediment had the campaign progressed inland. In preparing for a possible move out of Vera Cruz, Lejeune had been forced to order his quartermasters to requisition animals and carts from the civilian population in city.

Even with these problems, the Vera Cruz operation showcased the ability of integrated naval forces to rapidly concentrate combat power, on short notice, from dispersed locations. As a small intervention against minor opposition, however, it did not lead to any major improvements in amphibious warfare techniques. It would take World War I, which began four months after the landing, to demonstrate the real challenges facing amphibious practitioners in the Industrial Age.

Thanks to the Foxhole Foxette, Snippy for suggesting this Thread



TOPICS: VetsCoR
KEYWORDS: fletcher; freeperfoxhole; mexico; michaeldobbs; tampicoaffair; ussutah; veracruz; veterans; woodrowwilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Valin
1905 Max Schmeling Germany, world heavyweight boxing champ (1930-32)



Today Berlin has a Stadium named after Max Schmeling. Who was Max Schmeling? He was since 1930 German heavy-weight box-champion. He was the first European boxer of the 20th century to win this title. He was the idol of the younger generation of his time. However, Max Schmeling did not feather his nest by trying to serve in the rear lines. During the Battle for the conquest of Crete he was dropped on the island as paratrooper, he was wounded and nursed at the Zappion Megaron in Athens, which the Germans has turned to a military Hospital. After the War he returned to boxing in 1947 and won further fights. It has been maintained (see the 1998 edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica at the lemma Max Schmeling), that Max Schmeling was sent to the front line, because he had fallen out of favour with the Nationalsocialistic Party. This view is checked as false, because in that bloodiest for the Germans Battle, yet another much better connected parachutist was dropped on the island. He was the stepson of Joseph Goebbels, the closest and most entrusted to the very end associate and friend of Hitler, whom he appointed in his will as his successor. It is certain that this paratrooper could have avoided serving in the front line, had he wanted to.

21 posted on 09/28/2003 8:24:41 AM PDT by SAMWolf (BEWARE - Tagline Thief is in the area)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bentfeather
Good Morning Feather. It's sure nice to see you wired and able to get back in.
22 posted on 09/28/2003 8:25:29 AM PDT by SAMWolf (BEWARE - Tagline Thief is in the area)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
YES, IT SURE IS SAM!!
:-)
23 posted on 09/28/2003 8:33:25 AM PDT by Soaring Feather (Poets' Know the Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
OKers.
Back then, burning our flag was an act of war.
Now, people do it all the time.
Back then, speaking abusively against our leaders from foreign soil was treason, and a nation slandering our leaders was an act of war.
Now, such things are given a pass.
Back then honor, dignity, and 'the right thing to do' was more important than being 'sensitive' and 'not offending' anyone.
Now one must be mindful of the rights and feelings of extreme wackos who want to give gophers the right to free speech.
Back then, when a US soldier commited a crime on foreign soil, he was brought back to the US for trial and, if convicted, sat in a dark basement suite in Levinworth.
Now we put our soldiers under the rules and dictates of foreign laws that, in some cases, are contrary to the rules our soldiers must follow.
This last one is an ugly precedent to set, because once you put a soldier under penalty of foreign laws, you deny him the rights his uniform represents and basically reject him from his country.
A US soldier is, still, US property according to UCMJ.
The precedent for that is this, when you attempt suicide in the military, you get nailed for attempting to destroy US property.
24 posted on 09/28/2003 9:13:06 AM PDT by Darksheare (I will not _____the Dems. I will not_____the Dems. I will not _____the Dems. I will not_____the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bentfeather
Morning.
Mind spinning.
And all I hear is an intense.. humming.
*Slapping side of self's head*
Get.. out.. of.. there! Get.. out.. of .. there!
25 posted on 09/28/2003 9:15:19 AM PDT by Darksheare (I will not _____the Dems. I will not_____the Dems. I will not _____the Dems. I will not_____the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Yes.
Now adays national pride, formerly known as nationalism, is a 'dirty word'.
It was listed as the supposed root cause for World Wars One and Two.
And since WWII, national pride has been 'bred out' of us.
More like beat out of us, but that in and of itself is a whole story.
And yes, the thinking in 1914 was even vastly differnt from what it was in 1861.
Wonder what people 80 years from now will say about us?
26 posted on 09/28/2003 9:17:54 AM PDT by Darksheare (I will not _____the Dems. I will not_____the Dems. I will not _____the Dems. I will not_____the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Wonder what people 80 years from now will say about us?

I don't know but I have the feeling it'll be said in Spanish.

27 posted on 09/28/2003 9:21:42 AM PDT by SAMWolf (BEWARE - Tagline Thief is in the area)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
I'm afraid that will be so.
28 posted on 09/28/2003 9:25:43 AM PDT by Darksheare (And something just for the DU lurkers (_*_) You been mooned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
lol

Get out of here you nasty little gnome,
go to you house, is it a home?
My head is not a resting place
for nutty gnomes or trolls in haste.
So take thy heels and get thee out
look out for the warty trout.
29 posted on 09/28/2003 9:31:41 AM PDT by Soaring Feather (Poets' Know the Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bentfeather
*chuckle*
Thanks.
I think the humming was a Barry Manilow tune.
It's gone now.
30 posted on 09/28/2003 9:33:15 AM PDT by Darksheare (And something just for the DU lurkers (_*_) You been mooned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf; snippy_about_it; MistyCA; AntiJen; SpookBrat; SassyMom; PhilDragoo; All
Morning friends. Hope you all have a wonderful Sunday.

The Aftermath of War

The war is over (so they say).
So why do troops still die?
The death toll's mounting day by day
and critics wonder "why?"
"Why did we go to war?" they ask.
"Why can't we find Hussein?"
"Why can't we find those missing nukes?"
"Why not in heaven's name?"
"Why can't our soldiers leave Iraq?"
"Why must they linger there?"
"Why doesn't Bush say 'That's enough'?"
"Why can't he seem to care?"
But, maybe those who criticize
should understand the score.
What's going on is not a game.
It's gruesome, bloody war.
There are no halves or innings.
There are no rules or refs.
And unlike golf there is no prize
when there is sudden death.
In some ways it's like Calvary
when Christ defeated sin.
Our foe was wounded and he'll die
and when he does, we'll win.
But in the meantime we're on guard
for mines and sneak attacks.
Our victory is guaranteed,
but we must watch our backs.

-- Greg Asimakoupoulos

31 posted on 09/28/2003 10:03:23 AM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (Arnold has the conviction and the fighting spirit to lead California into a new age of recovery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Present!
32 posted on 09/28/2003 10:19:06 AM PDT by manna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Good afternoon Victoria. Interesting poem today. I like this part.

But in the meantime we're on guard
for mines and sneak attacks.
Our victory is guaranteed,
but we must watch our backs.

33 posted on 09/28/2003 10:22:09 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: manna
Good afternoon manna.
34 posted on 09/28/2003 10:22:25 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf; Colonel_Flagg
a haiku to our first complete game. I don't think I need to say who lost. LOL.




four thousand somethin'
to a measley three thirty
annihilated


35 posted on 09/28/2003 11:11:13 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
!!!!!
36 posted on 09/28/2003 11:26:47 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistence to tyrants is obedience to God. -Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
!!!!!
37 posted on 09/28/2003 11:29:19 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistence to tyrants is obedience to God. -Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Hi Snippy. I like it, too.

Hope you're having a nice day.

38 posted on 09/28/2003 11:37:19 AM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (Arnold has the conviction and the fighting spirit to lead California into a new age of recovery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
:-)
39 posted on 09/28/2003 11:37:46 AM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (Arnold has the conviction and the fighting spirit to lead California into a new age of recovery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
HI Lady.

Long Time, NO SEE!

free dixie,sw

40 posted on 09/28/2003 11:40:13 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistence to tyrants is obedience to God. -Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson