Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
I’ll stick with my FAL for .308s - the G3’s a lot more violent when you fire it and to me has a weird balance.

Never fired a FAL, but concur about the G3. Had a HK-91 with polygonal rifling, and that thing astounded me with the harsh recoil. I was used to the M-14, a far more mild recoil impulse.

The AR-10/-LR-308 platform is downright gentle, especially if you have an adjustable gas block to tune it.

71 posted on 12/07/2016 11:18:19 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: doorgunner69
Except like the AR-10's smaller relative, the AR-15, you get to chip carbon out of the innards for hours when you go to clean it. P

The G3 system is 'roller-delayed blowback' operated, as you know. It's not very *much* delayed, only barely enough to get the pressure in the chamber down to marginally safe levels before unlocking the bolt head, while the bolt carrier actually accelerates backwards even faster separately from the bolt head. As a result, there's not exactly a lot of mass in the operating mechanism to suck up the recoil, nor is there gas redirection to reduce recoil and the bolt starts its cycle the millisecond the round fires.

The FAL on the other hand uses a gas piston system and a tilting bolt, which makes for a very interesting felt recoil reducer and doesn't allow the bolt to start cycling until the bullet passes the gas tap towards the end of the barrel, so the recoil impulse has to try to move the entire mass of the rifle for quite a while. FALs are heavier than their G3 counterparts, too.


72 posted on 12/08/2016 12:26:51 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson