Skip to comments.
The FReeper Foxhole Remembers Gen. Richard Ewell at Gettysburg (7/1/1863) - Mar. 17th, 2005
America's Civil War Magazine
| Samuel J. Martin
Posted on 03/16/2005 9:40:41 PM PST by SAMWolf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: SAMWolf
http://www.gdg.org/Research/OOB/Confederate/July1-3/itrimble.html
From the Bachelder Papers, Vol 2 p. 921:
Letter from Maj. Gen Issac R. Trimble to J. B. Bachelder dated Feb. 8th, 1883:
J. B. Bachelder
Dear Sir:
I enclose you a brief account of what I saw and what I did at Gettysburg -the 1st and 3rd day.
On reporting to General Hill for orders the 3d day, I read General Lee's order of Battle, and give it to you almost word for word -this- "General Longstreet will make a vigorous attack on our right, Genl. Ewell will make a demonstration on our left; to be converted into a vigorous attack if circumstances justify it. general Hill will hold the center at all hazards."
R. E. Lee
If you have not obtained this order, it may be of value.
Yours
I.R. Trimble
(footnote 153: Original letter in file ends here. Balance of this report is from typed transcript attached to Trimble's letter. Writer not identified and original version not in the file) The following is extracted from the narrative on p930ff:)
As nothing in Gen'l Ewell's department indicated a design to advance against the enemy, Gen'l Trimble remembering Gen'l Lee's impressive words a few days before to "crush the advance of the enemy and attack him vigorously in detail", or words t to that effect, he approached Gen'l Ewell and said, "General don't you intend t to pursue our sweep and push the enemy vigorously?" His reply as "No, I have orders form Gen' Lee not to bring on a general engagement." to which Gen'l Trimble rejoined, "But Gen'l that order cannot have reference to the present situation, for we have had a general engagement and gained a great victory, and by all military rules we ought to follow up our success, and we are losing golden moments," to which appeal there was no reply. Gen'l Ewell turned and walked slowly about, his whole manner indicating [ir]resolution and that kind of impatience which springs from mutual indecision, or a feeling that three was a momentous crisis, and he did not see clearly what course t to take. His manner separated him from his staff and the approach of others.
NOTE: (Gen' Lee had issued orders to Gen'l Ewell about June 26th when directed him to march into Penn. "not to bring on a general engagement with the Federal army, with his corps.")
Deeply regretting the indecision of Gen'l Ewell, Gen'l Trimble left him, and rode around the outskirts of the city on the northern and north eastern side to learn the topography of the security. ..... Returning in half an hour he spoke t Gen'l Ewell and said, "Gen'l if you have decided not to advance against the enemy and we are only to hold our ground, I want to advise that you send a brigade with artillery to take possession of that hill (Culp's Hill). It commands Gettysburg and Cemetery Hill." "How do you know that?" said he. "I have been round there," was the reply, "and you know I am not often mistaken in judging of topography, and if we don't hold that hill, the enemy will certainly occupy it, as it is the key to the whole position about here and I beg you to send a force at once to secure it. "When I need advice from a junior officer, I generally ask it, " was Gen'l Ewell's ungracious reply. when Gen'l Trimble terminated the interview by saying, "Gen'l Ewell I am sorry you don't appreciate my suggestions, you will regret it as long as you live."
(Footnote 166: The following is from the original letter.) [as continued on page 932]
Gettysburg When the contest was ended, the first day, about 3:30; I and others urged Gen. Ewell to pursue our success and attack the enemy. This he did not do, on the plea that his troops were not in a condition to do so. Now Rhodes' division, which was the only one that began the fight on our left, had not been seriously injured and was in the finest spirits at the end of the fight. Early's div. came into action late in the contest on our extreme left, and was hardly injured at all; Johnson's division was but a few miles off, and came up about sundown.
Then, on the maxim of war, that "a routed enemy should be pursued, it seemed plain, that Ewell should have pressed forward, informing Gen. Lee and Gen Hill that he intended to pursue the enemy, and send express to Johnson to hasten forward, and follow him.
Whether successful or not; that, was the game play and Ewell ought to have taken the responsibility.
Finding he did not intend to do so, I strongly advised the occupation of Culps Hill at once. This was about half past 3 o'clock, not later than 4 o'clock I am sure. I said to him "that is the key of the position on Cemetery Hill." He answered, "How do you know," I said "I have been round, to north of the town and can see plainly that it commands Cemetery hill - and ought to be occupied by us, or the enemy as soon as possible" - General Ewell did not take any steps to occupy the hill, at once, and on after reflection decided not to attempt it. I think from reports of Federal Officers, Culp Hill was not occupied by any force of Meade's until about 5 to 5:30 P.M.
41
posted on
03/17/2005 7:58:07 AM PST
by
Valin
(DARE to be average!)
To: bentfeather
You DO realize that you are the only person in the history of FReeRepublic that's ever done anything like that.
We're all pretty shocked, and...saddened.
42
posted on
03/17/2005 8:01:10 AM PST
by
Valin
(DARE to be average!)
To: Valin
0461 St Patrick patron St of ENGINEERS, all else is of no importance.
To: Valin
Do I get a blonde prize??
To: Professional Engineer
The wonderful thing about this country is everyone is entitled to their opinion..no matter how silly. :-)
45
posted on
03/17/2005 8:20:57 AM PST
by
Valin
(DARE to be average!)
To: snippy_about_it; All
GM, snippy, et.al.!
free dixie HUGS,duckie/sw
46
posted on
03/17/2005 9:01:55 AM PST
by
stand watie
(being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
To: Valin
One of the great "what if's" of gettysburg.
47
posted on
03/17/2005 9:04:13 AM PST
by
SAMWolf
(Liberal Rule #5 - Anyone who disagrees with you is a Fascist.)
To: Valin
Too much
48
posted on
03/17/2005 9:06:35 AM PST
by
SAMWolf
(Liberal Rule #5 - Anyone who disagrees with you is a Fascist.)
To: stand watie
Morning stand watie.
Free Dixie!
49
posted on
03/17/2005 9:07:08 AM PST
by
SAMWolf
(Liberal Rule #5 - Anyone who disagrees with you is a Fascist.)
To: PzLdr
Thanks for your discourse. Your analysis is nicely compact and accurate in my opinion.
Lee was operating with (to me) shockingly bad logistics, his troops on foot, barefoot, with almost no transport, against the Army of the Potomac which was well equipped indeed. Lee's retreat was a disaster of bad logistics. I think that if McClellan was excessive in his logistic demands then Lee was complaisant in his.
When I get to the battleground one day I want to examine the terrain to the Federal right on the third day. It is possible but unlikely that something could have been done there by Lee, but I doubt it because of the Federal extreme interior lines situation. The Federal left, the Longstreet argument, etc., is pretty clear.
Another criticism of Lee, as I see it, is that he really did not have a handle on the situation at Gettysburg like he did in his defensive battles. (C3I, I hear they call it nowadays.) Lee had the resources, as you point out. Perhaps he lacked the extreme physical vigor required back then, the ability to live in the saddle and wear out ten horses a day that Custer had.
I have a lot of affection for the Second Day Iron Brigade defense. Those regiments existed in name only after that.
Again, thanks for your essay.
50
posted on
03/17/2005 9:08:05 AM PST
by
Iris7
(A man said, "That's heroism." "No, that's Duty," replied Roy Benavides, Medal of Honor.)
To: Professional Engineer
Off to dig up some concrete.
51
posted on
03/17/2005 9:09:53 AM PST
by
SAMWolf
(Liberal Rule #5 - Anyone who disagrees with you is a Fascist.)
To: Valin
That is a nice piece, Valin. Interesting and enjoyable.
52
posted on
03/17/2005 9:16:31 AM PST
by
Iris7
(A man said, "That's heroism." "No, that's Duty," replied Roy Benavides, Medal of Honor.)
To: SAMWolf; All
GA, sam!
saw the following sign on the rear window of an SUV headed north on I-95 this AM:
"Erin, go braughLESS!"
i lol at that one!
free dixie,sw
53
posted on
03/17/2005 9:41:56 AM PST
by
stand watie
(being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. it is a LEARNED prejudice against dixie.)
To: SAMWolf
To: bentfeather
Hey, that's not the Unicorn Song.
To: E.G.C.
Congratulations to OU. They defeated Niagra 84-67 to advance in the NCAA.
56
posted on
03/17/2005 11:50:38 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: stand watie
57
posted on
03/17/2005 11:53:33 AM PST
by
snippy_about_it
(Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
To: bentfeather
Top of the afternoon to you feather.
58
posted on
03/17/2005 11:54:40 AM PST
by
snippy_about_it
(Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
To: Iris7; PzLdr
Thanks to both of you. I never tire of reading about this fascinating battle. The generalship may have been poor, but the feats of heroism by the soldiers and line officers were amazing.
To: SAMWolf; snippy_about_it
Hiya, Sam and Snip. Glad to hear old Ewell is off the hook for the Gettysburg loss. As I recall, the movie Gettysburg leaned toward the Ewell's fault theory. I tend to agree with the post, that it would have been awfully tough for Ewell to seize the heights after fighting all day, when the Union forces were receiving a steady stream of reinforcements.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson