Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FReeper Foxhole Reviews USAAF Night Fighters at War ~ Part 1 of 3 - Jan. 16, 2004
http://www.usaaf.net/ww2/night/index.htm ^ | Stephen L. McFarland

Posted on 01/16/2004 4:07:06 AM PST by snippy_about_it



Lord,

Keep our Troops forever in Your care

Give them victory over the enemy...

Grant them a safe and swift return...

Bless those who mourn the lost.
.

FReepers from the Foxhole join in prayer
for all those serving their country at this time.



...................................................................................... ...........................................

U.S. Military History, Current Events and Veterans Issues

Where Duty, Honor and Country
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.

Our Mission:

The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans.

In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support.

The FReeper Foxhole hopes to share with it's readers an open forum where we can learn about and discuss military history, military news and other topics of concern or interest to our readers be they Veteran's, Current Duty or anyone interested in what we have to offer.

If the Foxhole makes someone appreciate, even a little, what others have sacrificed for us, then it has accomplished one of it's missions.

We hope the Foxhole in some small way helps us to remember and honor those who came before us.

To read previous Foxhole threads or
to add the Foxhole to your sidebar,
click on the books below.

Conquering the Night - Part One



Nightfighters at War

"Cut short the night; use some of it for the day’s business." -Seneca


The United States never wanted for recruits in what was, from start to finish, an all-volunteer night fighting force.

For combatants, a constant in warfare through the ages has been the sanctuary of night, a refuge from the terror of the day’s armed struggle. On the other hand, darkness has offered protection for operations made too dangerous by daylight. Combat has also extended into the twilight as day has seemed to provide too little time for the destruction demanded in modern mass warfare.

In World War II the United States Army Air Forces (AAF) flew nighttime missions to counter enemy activities under cover of darkness. Allied air forces had established air superiority over the battlefield and behind their own lines, and so Axis air forces had to exploit the night’s protection for their attacks on Allied installations. AAF night fighters sought to deny the enemy use of the night for these attacks. Also, by 1944 Allied daylight air superiority made Axis forces maneuver and resupply at night, by air, land, and sea. U.S. night fighters sought to disrupt these activities as an extension of daylight interdiction and harassment efforts. The AAF would seek to deny the enemy the night, while capitalizing on the night in support of daylight operations.

Airmen Claim the Night Skies


The first true night fighter aircraft were British, struggling to hunt down German Zeppelins lurking in the night skies over England in 1915. These slow behemoths were sitting ducks in daylight, so they were used primarily after dark. For six months British airmen struggled to find the Zeppelins and shoot them down. This effort exposed several problems: once notified, how to ascend and reach the enemy’s altitude before he flew out of range; how to find the enemy in a darkened sky; and, finally, how to knock him down. Technology soon provided answers, allowing R. A. J. Warneford to use aerial bombs to claim the first Zeppelin in June 1915. British night defenses exacted an increasing toll, claiming 79 of the 123 airships Germany built for the war.



The enemy then switched from Zeppelins to a bomber airplane offensive against England. At first striking by day, German Gothas and Giants soon sought the night’s protection from British defenses. What airmen lost in bombing accuracy by flying at night they more than made up in safety against enemy defenses. The night assault caught the public’s imagination, but caused no serious damage. British planes performed well against German bombers protected by machine guns and the dark; in fact, the night itself proved the greater danger. In nineteen night raids, the defense, guided by radio intercepts, ground observers, searchlights, and blind luck, claimed twenty-four invading bombers, while thirty-six others were destroyed in unrelated crashes.



Together, German bombers and airships claimed about 1,400 dead on the ground and nearly 3,400 injured, enough to threaten the British sense of pride and breach the insular protection previously afforded by the English Channel. Though the German aerial offensive hardly threatened the British war effort, it did force a diversion of eight hundred British fighters from the Western Front, where they were sorely needed. Though primitive, this first “Battle of Britain” set the stage for the aerial night fighting in the next war.



Conquering the Night through Research


Because of inadequate funding and official disinterest, night fighting became the responsibility of regular U.S. tactical squadrons during the interwar years. These units had enough problems preparing for day war, much less confronting the obstacles of darkness. Yet, despite minimal budgets, pioneering airmen still strove to conquer the night by developing blind-flying techniques, primarily at the Army Air Service’s Engineering Division at McCook Field, and later at the Army Air Corps’ Materiel Division at Wright Field, both near Dayton, Ohio.

The research of 1st Lts. Muir S. Fairchild and Clayton Bissell in the 1920s showed that night operations required a specifically designed aircraft with great speed and maneuverability and an unobstructed view for the pilot. Test flights revealed that pilots became disoriented when they lost sight of the ground and the horizon. Human senses contradicted aircraft instruments, while vertigo magnified a pilot’s confusion. The biggest problems were how to land and navigate at night. U.S. airmen tested electric landing lights and flares without success, though the tests did reveal the need for illuminated instruments and flame dampers for engine exhausts.

In 1928 Edwin Link’s ground trainer made practicing for night missions safer and less expensive, but did not solve the basic problem of flying into inky blackness. Intrepid airmen such as 1st Lts. James Doolittle and Albert Hegenberger attacked the problem of blind takeoffs and landings in what the New York Times called the “greatest single step forward in [aerial] safety.” Newly invented illuminated instruments-a specially designed artificial horizon, directional gyroscope, turn indicator, radio beacon, and barometric altimeter allowed Doolittle and Hegenberger to make blind flights from 1929 to 1932 that opened the night skies to military operations.


Jimmy Doolittle


At the end of this critical period, 1st Lt. Carl Crane published the first U.S. treatise on night flying, Blind Flying in Theory and Practice (1932). Soon the homing beacon indicator and radio compass made possible night navigation, and flying the air mail across the country during the 1930s gave Army airmen practical experience in flying at night. Late in the decade, U.S. bomber squadrons were practicing occasional night missions, including mock interceptions in which fighter (pursuit) aircraft were guided by searchlights on the ground.

Obvious to aviators was the seemingly insurmountable obstacle of finding another airplane in the vast emptiness of the night sky. If the opposing crew took basic precautions to “black-out” their aircraft, the optimal range of an intercepting pilot’s vision declined to 750 feet or less, though on especially clear nights with strong moonlight three-mile visibility was possible.



Night fighters needed assistance from the ground to bring them within visual range of their targets. Until 1938 this help came from searchlight crews lucky enough to illuminate an intruding aircraft and from acoustical locators using conical horns to focus incoming sound. There were also vain attempts to detect radio waves emitted by the spark plugs of aircraft engines or infrared radiation from engine exhaust gases. Tests at Fort MacArthur, California, in 1937 and in Hawaii in 1940 proved the futility of such efforts.

All this development seemed to make no difference. A new generation of bombers such as the Martin B-10 could fly higher, faster, and farther than any fighter in the world, convincing a whole generation of Americans to agree with erstwhile British prime minister Stanley Baldwin that “the bomber will always get through,” whether day or night. On its test flight the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress set a world record, flying 2,270 nonstop miles at 252 miles per hour. Many airmen believed fighter aircraft could never intercept and shoot down such bombers in broad daylight, let alone at night. Since bombers could strike by day without peril, there would be no need for night missions and no need for a night-fighting capability. Only when the Second World War revealed these new bombers to be vulnerable to attack during the day and unable to “always get through” did the need for night fighters again become clear.



In the United States, air doctrine reinforced a disregard for night operations. At the Air Corps Tactical School, first at Langley Field, Virginia, and then at Maxwell Field, Alabama, the faculty developed daylight high altitude precision strategic bombing and advocated this concept as the offensive doctrine of the U.S. Army Air Corps. Large fleets of fast, well armed bombers would attack key chokepoints in an enemy’s industrial fabric by day-the most rapid, efficient, and least bloody means for defeating the enemies of the United States.

The revolution in bomber technology represented by the four-engine B-17 made axiomatic the belief that no defenses could stop such an attack. Brig. Gen. Oscar Westover expressed the conviction of most U.S. airmen when he declared that “no known agency can frustrate the accomplishment of a bombardment mission.” Norden and Sperry optical bombsights could locate precise industrial targets from four or five miles up under the proper conditions, but only during the day and in the absence of high winds and excessive cloud cover.

This strategic bombing doctrine and its advocates overwhelmed any airmen still concerned with defense and fighter operations, and encouraged the building of an air force committed to daylight bombing operations. Thus, the Materiel Division redirected its research in blind and night flying to the problems of aiming bombs through overcast. Defensive strategies reflected this emphasis on daylight precision bombing, and more defensive- minded airmen began to focus on the problems of daylight interception. Even the conflicts of the interwar period, including the Spanish Civil War, gave U.S. airmen no persuasive reasons to alter their thinking.




FReeper Foxhole Armed Services Links




TOPICS: VetsCoR
KEYWORDS: armyairforces; freeperfoxhole; nightfighters; samsdayoff; usaaf; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last
To: GATOR NAVY
That could explain the eighteen holes found drilled in the flight deck of the Hornet after the Doolittle Raiders took off.
141 posted on 01/16/2004 7:57:35 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
So I see now. I found this pic of a P-38M nightfighter.


142 posted on 01/16/2004 7:59:30 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
Maybe for the squid boys but we USAF Flyboys want our O'Club before the asphalt on the runway gets cool.
143 posted on 01/16/2004 8:01:16 PM PST by CholeraJoe (USAF, We have air conditoning and cold beer. Call us, someone will be sober enough to fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
And here's a twin seater.


144 posted on 01/16/2004 8:01:27 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
Good man.
145 posted on 01/16/2004 8:01:32 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
A little trivia for you on one of the two seaters. If you have ever seen the picture of Richard Bong and the female movie star by his plane, that is the before picture. He took her up in it and showed her what it could do and a few things the designer never thought off. When they landed she was screaming, beating him on the head with both fist and had peed in her pants. He was trying to ward off the blows mumbling, "What did I do, what did I do". There were not pictures published of that part.
146 posted on 01/16/2004 8:07:08 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD; CholeraJoe
Now here's something I've never seen. This pic is titled "Lightning ambulance pods". I bet that was a ride.


147 posted on 01/16/2004 8:08:07 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
I would hate to be the flight nurse who had to crawl out and check the IV's every once in awhile.
148 posted on 01/16/2004 8:10:05 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
There was a rig like that for Special Forces under an F4 during the Vietnam days. It was a way of insertion.
149 posted on 01/16/2004 8:12:20 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it; U S Army EOD
the P-38 a single seater

There were about 75 2 seater P-38M nightfighters built, a batch of 2 seater TP-38L trainers, and some weird variants , one of which put a bombadier in the nose, and another of which had an observer in that position. Then, there was the twin cockpit version used to test a pressurized cockpit...

I'll spot you the single engine P-51 since as I recall the twin engine version had a different type designation, and may have postdated the war.

150 posted on 01/16/2004 9:32:48 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
The twin engine P51 was the P82 which was used quite a bit in Korea. Don't hold me to P(82) but I think I am right. It was basically two P51's coupled together with two pilots.
151 posted on 01/16/2004 9:38:15 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
That's the one I was thinking of. I didn't realize it had gotten into service - I just remember seeing a picture of it in a book when I was young.
152 posted on 01/16/2004 10:05:07 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
I just did a little research on it and it was designed as a long range escort plane for the Pacific. It was also designed as a night fighter. However it did not come into service on a large scale until after the war. It was the first plane to down a North Korean Yak in Korea and the last propeller driven fighter that was in production.
153 posted on 01/16/2004 10:10:53 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: PAR35; U S Army EOD; GATOR NAVY
Is this a good looking plane or what. Thanks guys for the great conversation you all carried on while I slept. LOL. Very informative. I enjoyed reading through the thread this morning. I'm about to post part two!

The Lockheed P-38 Lightning was one of the best-known Army Air Forces fighters that flew in World War II. It was already in mass production before the war started for the United States, and production lasted until 1945. With a wingspan of 52 feet; a length of 37 feet, 10 inches; and a height of 9 feet, 10 inches, the P-38s had maximum speeds ranging from 390 miles per hour for the basic P-38 to 414 mph for the P-38L. Except for the M model (a two-seater), all the P-38s were single-seat pursuit and long-range escort aircraft.

154 posted on 01/17/2004 2:40:56 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
BTTT!!!!!!
155 posted on 01/17/2004 3:22:57 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: carton253
I see you have due respect for Thomas Jonathan Jackson. Shows you have good taste, and lack nothing but vulgarity.

You show an admirable quality of self restraint as well in your relations with the detestable Prof. One of my fond hopes is to retire and attend the University of Wisconsin at Madison, which has a nice discount for old folks. I expect there will be more than one sorry person up there when they realize I do not care a fig if they give me an F in their course. I dream of visiting them during their office hours. Ah, justice at last!

Got any hints? I figure this program will be more successful if it is the joint effort of good men and women. How about a droll story or two? A fantasy of justice done? Every idea useful for this project will be very thoughtfully considered!
156 posted on 01/17/2004 4:24:38 AM PST by Iris7 ("Duty, Honor, Country". The first of these is Duty, and is known only through His Grace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Howdy, Snippy!

Think that second photo may be of a Gotha. Have to ask Mr. Gage.

Now to what I know. A hardware sort of guy, I have great affection for the Double Wasp - the Black Widow's engines. That machine was the first wartime over 2,000 horsepower aero engine in mass use, I believe. Very well cooled, extraordinarily rugged ("Gabby" Gabreski flew his Thunderbolt back to England with a 20 mm hit in the engine, one of the cylinders was blown clean off, I mean, GONE!!! Try THAT with a darn Merlin!!), and truly massively powerful for it's day, the Double Wasp was the epitome of American engineering.

(Well, the B-29 was pretty cool, and the gaseous diffusion plants were way cool, but nuclear weapons are simple alongside such wonders after the physics were sorted out. That cost some good men, by the way. "Fat Man and Little Boy" is quite historical about that.)

Our stuff may have made the Europeans sneer at "crudeness", at raw "cubic inches", but by Harry those radials exposed the English and German engines for what they were, expensive, handmade, heavy, low in power, fragile, unreliable, and just darn aesthetically displeasing. Talk about doing things the hard way, and not even doing it well!
157 posted on 01/17/2004 5:01:52 AM PST by Iris7 ("Duty, Honor, Country". The first of these is Duty, and is known only through His Grace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
"With that jump start, the Rad Lab produced the submarine hunter technology that reversed the course of the Battle of the Atlantic and spelled the end for the U-Boat wolfpacks."

I wouldn't say "the end", since there were many contributions, not least of all by the lads at the sharp end. I have a lot of affection for the Bletchley people who mostly did OK with Enigma traffic.

The radar set they are talking about had a parallel six tube circular lay out oscillator - transmitter, had a neat output tuned circuit, a coil in each tube plate lead. Machine was revolutionary for the day, the Germans could barely detect the emissions because the frequency was so high. The cool part of my story is this: the tubes were at the very most cutting edge, and had been designed for and by Radio Amateurs for the Amateur Service, and Radio Amateurs who were mighty fine engineers were the boys who showed the big physicists how to make the circuit and get it working! One for the good guys!

Some technical details are hazy, been forty years since I was an active amateur, KH6EZH.
158 posted on 01/17/2004 5:23:16 AM PST by Iris7 ("Duty, Honor, Country". The first of these is Duty, and is known only through His Grace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
10 centimeter cavity magnetron technology was so spooky that the Germans captured one in '44 as I recollect out of a Lancaster's H2S night bombing radar. The Germans took it all apart, thought about it, and decided that the Brits were trying to spoof them, again. Such a thing couldn't do anything!

Actually, how it works is just amazing. Electrons are forced to travel in spirals by the magnet and emit cherenkov radiation locked to 10 cm by the cavities, which have the most sophisticated coupling slots imaginable into the magnetic electron chamber.

At least I think that is how it works! The son-of-a-gun has always looked like magic to me! One of the great mysteries of my youth, one of those I have never figured out! As hard to understand as the fairer sex! No, I take that back, Snippy!
159 posted on 01/17/2004 5:44:34 AM PST by Iris7 ("Duty, Honor, Country". The first of these is Duty, and is known only through His Grace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
If you can find the movie, "A Guy Named Joe". Watch it and you will see a neat movie with P38's, you will probably have to buy it. After that rent or buy, "Always", which features A26's. Let me know if see a link between the movies who where made 50 years apart.
160 posted on 01/17/2004 6:39:31 AM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson