Skip to comments.
New Ron Paul Anti-Newt Ad Runs in Iowa: "Serial Hypocrisy" (Freddie Mac/Mandate)
Ron Paul 2012 ^
| 12-06-2011
| Ron Paul 2012
Posted on 12/06/2011 9:33:03 AM PST by montag813
BRUTAL. And we still have a month to go until the Caucus.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012; newt; newtgingrich; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: detective
Does anyone know what Ronald Reagan's 11th commandment was? Just more evidence that there is no one of Reagan's ability or stature in this primary field.
That didn't stop Reagan from slamming Ford in '76. It is what made him competitive in that race. The 11th commandment is from Reagans '66 Gov run when the party was split apart after Goldwater. Reagan wasn't bashful in going after Ford in '76 and Bush in '80. If we were to go by this today, all of FR would have to keep their mouth shut about Mittens and his terrible record. I'll pass.
21
posted on
12/06/2011 9:55:30 AM PST
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: svcw
The words my be accurate the presentation is pure distortion. You have just given the textbook definition of the negative political advertisement. Problem is, they WORK. Paul can never be nominated, but this is just a taste of what Newt will face.
To: montag813
23
posted on
12/06/2011 9:55:50 AM PST
by
PMAS
To: montag813
Ron Paul is a first class nut case.
To: montag813
If you can't convince voters to vote for you based on your own merits, because you are a raving lunatic, then you have to try to destroy your opponent with disingenuous advertising and claims. Ron Paul is such a class act.
Interesting that Ron Paul is running the same sort of campaign that Obama is going to run--since he can't run on his record either.
So much for Reagan's 11th commandment--oh yeah, Paul abandoned Reagan and the Republican Party back in the 80's.
I see the ad fails to mention the fact that Ron Paul is one of the highest, if not the highest recipient of pork-barrel money and requester of earmarks in Congress all the while railing against them and claiming that "he doesn't vote for them."
There's hypocrisy and then there's hypocrisy.
25
posted on
12/06/2011 9:58:52 AM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
To: montag813
Your old buddy RUN-Paul is making a huge mistake by wasting campaign funds to take out who he sees as a threat to his pathetic Populist/Liberalterian dream.
This won't do him a bit of good and it will help Newt before it will hurt him. It will only manage to illustrate how hateful the Paul camp truly is. Instead of going after Romney and Obama, they take this route. What ever dudes, just go smoke another doob and it will all be good.
26
posted on
12/06/2011 10:01:43 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: mk2000
>>Paul attacking Newt or other Republicans is a stupid way to go about becoming the nominee and it’s why Gingrich is doing well.<<
.
But now that these serious charges are out in the open for everyone to hear and see it behooves Newt to respond to them or they will be mentioned on December 27 when there will be another televised debate.
If Newt does not respond to these charges, Bambi may use them for his own campaign in 2012 and the MSM will run with them.
27
posted on
12/06/2011 10:02:28 AM PST
by
353FMG
To: Lazlo in PA
That didn't stop Reagan from slamming Ford in '76. It is what made him competitive in that race. The 11th commandment is from Reagans '66 Gov run when the party was split apart after Goldwater. Reagan wasn't bashful in going after Ford in '76 and Bush in '80. If we were to go by this today, all of FR would have to keep their mouth shut about Mittens and his terrible record. I'll pass. AMEN. Enough of the stupid, nonexistent "11th Commandment". It is a Republican fantasy, used mainly by RINOs to defend their pathetic losers, like McCain and Romney. A real conservative can defend themselves, and won't hide behind something that Reagan himself did not abide.
To: detective
Does anyone know what Ronald Reagan's 11th commandment was? Just more evidence that there is no one of Reagan's ability or stature in this primary field. Most of the Republican candidates are too stupid to realize that all their fire should be directed at Obama.
29
posted on
12/06/2011 10:03:38 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
To: Countyline
Newt is not the guy to lead America. I've got to agree with that. It seems to me that Newt is all about getting himself the title "President of the United States".
He is not about advancing any conservative agenda. In fact, in that regard, Newt is like Romney - totally unpredictable. At least with Paul, Bachmann, and the rest you could comfortably predict what they would do.
30
posted on
12/06/2011 10:04:25 AM PST
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: Sudetenland
I see the ad fails to mention the fact that Ron Paul is one of the highest, if not the highest recipient of pork-barrel money and requester of earmarks in Congress all the while railing against them and claiming that "he doesn't vote for them." Sounds like a great idea for a Newt ad!
To: Logical me
Ron Paul is a first class nut case.On behalf of first class nut cases everywhere I demand an apology.
32
posted on
12/06/2011 10:06:22 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
To: Vision
Well let's taks some things that are NOT out of context:
- Newt and Pelosi sitting down to push their global warming agenda - no way to interpret this as conservative
- Newt supports amnesty for illegal aliens (then he doesn't) then he does
- Newt wants (or wanted or will want again) gun owners to supply their thumbprint to the government
- Gingrich supported the individual health care mandate so dear to 0. (now he doesn't, and then maybe he does)
Newt is NOT anywhere close to a conservative. He's nothing but a liberal political hack who says what people want to hear, but when elected is nothing but a liberal on the Republican side, and he didn't even used to be a Republican - he took money to switch sides from Democrat so in actuality he's just a whore.
33
posted on
12/06/2011 10:06:22 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(your own government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Your old buddy RUN-Paul is making a huge mistake by wasting campaign funds to take out who he sees as a threat to his pathetic Populist/Liberalterian dream. Why do you assume I support RuPaul? I do not. Just posting an ad that Drudge put on his page at noon.
To: detective
To not speak negatively about fellow conservatives? How does this apply to Newt?
35
posted on
12/06/2011 10:10:31 AM PST
by
Ingtar
(Newt (four more for Obama) & Mitt (Obamacare) - what wonderful choices!)
To: montag813
“AMEN. Enough of the stupid, nonexistent “11th Commandment”. It is a Republican fantasy, used mainly by RINOs to defend their pathetic losers, like McCain and Romney. A real conservative can defend themselves, and won’t hide behind something that Reagan himself did not abide. “
Righto. If someone should complain about the ‘11th”, it could be Paul, but he gives and receives. ‘Tis the season to be unmerry’ when it comes to getting the nomination.
36
posted on
12/06/2011 10:10:47 AM PST
by
ex-snook
("above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
To: montag813
Even a broken cl//koc/ok is right twice a day.
37
posted on
12/06/2011 10:13:03 AM PST
by
JohnBovenmyer
(Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
To: montag813
Funny how the public has a big problem with a former politician working as a paid lobbyist for $1million while Jamie Gorelick got paid $26million on the inside because she was such a banking genius after being such a national security genius and then went on to be a legal advisor genius "helping" negotiate damages between BP and the gubmint.
Nobody blinks about the damage that woman has done.
38
posted on
12/06/2011 10:14:19 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Since Obama's only challengers in 2012 are in the GOP debates, including him the next 15.)
To: montag813
Yeah, but Newt doesn’t believe in “eating our own” just for short term political gain. He’s pretty much shown himself willing to run on his record rather than attacking another candidate’s record.
39
posted on
12/06/2011 10:16:07 AM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
To: detective
Does anyone know what Ronald Reagan’s 11th commandment was?
That was “made” after he was President. I am sure he was brutal like everyone else during the primary.
40
posted on
12/06/2011 10:21:43 AM PST
by
napscoordinator
(Anybody but Romney, Newt, Perry, Huntsman, Paul. Perry and Obama are 100 percent the same!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson