1 posted on
10/23/2011 7:18:01 PM PDT by
alexmai
To: alexmai
I don’t have too many issues with Ron Paul’s economic / libertarian views, it’s when he starts speaking about cultural issues and foreign policy that he makes me nervous.
2 posted on
10/23/2011 7:21:31 PM PDT by
YankeeReb
(No matter what, AB0 in 2012.)
To: alexmai
Twenty percent is bascially stating that our economy is getting butchered. I also think it’s a lot more accurate.
3 posted on
10/23/2011 7:21:57 PM PDT by
Niuhuru
(The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
To: alexmai
Addressing just the headline, Paul is right, US unemployment is right around 20%.
4 posted on
10/23/2011 7:23:18 PM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
To: alexmai
He’s right about this. Government statistics are a lie when it comes to unemployment and actual inflation.
6 posted on
10/23/2011 7:24:47 PM PDT by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: alexmai
Looks like Paul is splitting the difference between the Labor Dept.’s U6 figure and Shadow Statistics’ figure.
7 posted on
10/23/2011 7:25:00 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: alexmai
You’ve posted a total of ten threads since joining FR in July, yet you haven’t posted a single reply.
Just so you know, that’s considered extremely bad form around here, and makes you suspicious in the eyes of many forum regulars.
8 posted on
10/23/2011 7:27:00 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: alexmai
Everybody says Paul is too far out there to be president.
I'm starting to think that he is sane and the rest of us are the crazy ones.
getting rid of five useless federal departments may seem crazy but they don't really serve any purpose, we can't afford them, and they are probably unconstitutional. So who are the crazy ones?
9 posted on
10/23/2011 7:28:49 PM PDT by
oldbrowser
(Democrats have no superego.)
To: alexmai
12 posted on
10/23/2011 7:33:35 PM PDT by
FritzG
To: FReepers; everyone; All
PLEASE CONSIDER DONATING TO FREE REPUBLIC TODAY OR BECOMING A MONTHLY DONOR
CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE TO DONATE
16 posted on
10/23/2011 7:44:24 PM PDT by
onyx
(You're here on FR, so support it! Compiling New Sarah Ping List. Let me know if you want on it.)
To: alexmai
But how is Ron Paul basing his 20% figure? Given that government calculations for unemployment rate can be all over the place, an accurate figure in modern times is at times hard to come by.
Besides, this is why we need MAJOR tax reform, at least to Steve Forbes' flat-rate income tax plan. That way, businesses are encouraged to keep their liquid assets and capital investments in the USA because of being tax advantageous to do so.
17 posted on
10/23/2011 7:51:16 PM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: alexmai
Even a stopped cukoo clock is right twice a day.
19 posted on
10/23/2011 8:01:36 PM PDT by
Crucial
To: alexmai
Gee if he only got there are bad guy out there who don’t like freedom in any form and want to kill us he might be a fine candidate.
22 posted on
10/23/2011 8:10:07 PM PDT by
svcw
(Those who are easily shocked... should be shocked more often. - Mae West)
To: alexmai
One thing to keep in mind is that the unemployment rate is highly dependent on the skill set. Just try to find a halfway decent software engineer right now. I was trying to hire one, and after a nationwide posting, we got one applicant, and we pay very well. We finally turned to headhunters.
I heard a similar story from a guy who opened up a manufacturing plant, and all he was looking for was people to run the automated machinery. He needed basic math and reading skills, and the pay was decent enough, maybe 2-3 times minimum. He had many applicants, but the vast majority couldn't even pass the basic math and reading skills. I don't know if he ever was able to fill the jobs.
Other areas, such as real estate, have been devastated. It's not easy to retrain, either. It takes about 10 years to master anything, and if you haven't mastered it, you're back at the bottom with the low-level people clawing your way up.
When you collect together the people who can't find work, the people who have no usable skills, the people who could take another job but won't start a career all over again, and the people who prefer unemployment, yes 20% is possible.
at 25%, they will start turning feral... in some places i think it's already happening
27 posted on
10/23/2011 8:48:45 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: alexmai
While I agree we are facing a much larger rate today, the idea that no jobs were created since 2000 is a massive lie and preposterous idea. We saw several years of very low unemployment and high job creation. The libs tried to pretend that the slump in 08 and slide in jobs negated the previous 7 years. This is yet another example of Paul pushing liberal lies.
33 posted on
10/23/2011 9:28:59 PM PDT by
ilgipper
(Everything you get from the government was taken from someone else)
To: alexmai
40 posted on
10/23/2011 11:08:55 PM PDT by
Lorianne
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson