fyi
“In 1988 Ron Paul was nominated by the Libertarian Party for president and ran against the Reagan agenda, at one point telling the Dallas Morning News, Reagan was a “dramatic failure” as President. Paul also said, “I want to totally disassociate myself from the Reagan Administration”, Reagan was “a failure, yes, in, in many ways”. Transcript of Paul’s remarks on Meet the Press. Also, see Youtube video of Paul on MTP”.
Groan...don't we have enough problems without having to contend with that?
I'll admit it. GOP victory stands on three legs: economic, social, national defense.
Ron Paul has one full leg and one partial leg. One leg is missing.
But wait! There is more! If Ron Paul were strong on defense, much of his support would evaporate overnight. Why? Because he would not be useful to the left. The media would drop him. We would not see threads on leftist forums saying "Please Mother Earth, Let Ron Paul Win the GOP Nomination"
I watched a video yesterday of Rue Paul saying that 9/11 was the result of our “occupation” of arab countries. I wouldn’t pee on him if he was on fire.
Ron Paul is not conservative, he is more like a libertarian.
ping
Conservatives are becoming more vocal. The anger has been pent up for yrs now.
Has nothing to do with Ron Paul and his screwball followers.
Libertarians are anti-war and small government supporters. Most are not interested in moral conservatism, although some support it. That is why Paul sees nothing wrong with abortion, and supports it. I would wonder what kind of supreme court justices a libertarian would promote.
The only thing I have against Ron Paul being the 2012 nominee is his age, and I’ll accept that. Every other person mentioned who might be electable is worse — way worse, usually.
Paul is the *only* one I trust to seriously try to rein in out-of-control spending.
Palin isn’t ready to be president, and probably never will be.
The only thing I have against Ron Paul being the 2012 nominee is his age, and I’ll accept that. Every other person mentioned who might be electable is worse — way worse, usually.
Paul is the *only* one I trust to seriously try to rein in out-of-control spending.
Palin isn’t ready to be president, and probably never will be.
Mitt Romney has a better chance at President than Ron Paul does.
“When you boil it all down and though they won’t admit it, here’s what those who complain about “Ron Paul people” really care about — GOP victory.”
Losers do NOT set the agenda.
Ron Paul Acolyte Glossary:
Neo-Con: Anybody who does not worship Ron Paul.
Statist: Anybody who does not worship Ron Paul.
Paul-Hater: Anybody who does not worship Ron Paul.
RINO: Any GOP candidate who is not Ron Paul.
Small-government conservative: This only applies to Ron Paul or Ron Paul disciples such as Debra Medina or Rand Paul. Nobody else is allowed to claim this.
Big-government supporter: Anybody who does not worship Ron Paul.
People who understand and support the Constitution: This only applies to Ron Paul or Ron Paul disciples such as Debra Medina or Rand Paul. Nobody else is allowed to claim this.
Feel free to add any that might not be noted here.