Skip to comments.
'Fight them over there vs. over here' a false choice
The Washington Times ^
| 2009-07-01
| U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, 14th District
Posted on 07/03/2009 9:11:35 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121 next last
To: Gondring
Your logic is flawed, I never said that 911 was an attack allowed to happen by the Bush Administration as would the weakest truther.
What I said was every time we fought them here we lost badly.
Learn the difference,
101
posted on
07/04/2009 12:29:11 PM PDT
by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: usmcobra
What I said was every time we fought them here we lost badly. And you used 9/11 as support, as if we had "fought them here"... which must mean that you believe Desert Shield/Desert Storm were "fought here"...
...making you a "truther" about the early 90s deployment/action being coooked up in Hollywood or something. As for me, I believe that it took place in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, and other assisting nations.
102
posted on
07/04/2009 12:37:38 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: randomhero97
What a brilliant military mind you do possess. The fact that the Saudi king has been our greatest ally against Communism for the past 60 years, is a small detail that shouldn't have any influence on your well thought-out strategy. And since every real student of the war on terror knows bin Laden hates the Royal family and Saudi Arabia as much as he hates America, you're likely to head off to battle alone, with your paper sword and lollipops.
If you read anything about bin Laden you'd know he deliberately used Saudis on 9/11 to provoke hatred between his two greatest enemies. And you ate it up with a spoon. Sucker.
103
posted on
07/04/2009 12:43:19 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: Gondring
Boy, you sure have your head up your rectum.
Over here is on our shores not in Saudi Arabia or Kuwait.
As a matter of fact I don’t ever think you know what the hell you are talking about.
Name for me one battle that took place inside the borders of the United States during Desert Storm or Shield?
Come on genius name one...
104
posted on
07/04/2009 12:46:25 PM PDT
by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: Deb
Who is the number one financier of terrorism worldwide? What is most militant form of Islam? Who finances the building of mosques nation wide in the US? What Middle Eastern country is the most intolerent to other religions?
The Saudis are going to do what's best for the Saudis. You are abolutely insane if you think they are our ally just to be our ally.
Does your "real student" of the war on terror studies include Google and various other search engines? Please just stop talking about stuff you have absolutely no idea about.
105
posted on
07/04/2009 2:14:08 PM PDT
by
randomhero97
("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
To: Deb
he hates America,
He hates us because of our freedoms, right? What a f**king joke.
He "hates" us because we won't let them rot in the desert with their thirteenth century bs. That would be easier if we could have our own domestic oil supply. It's a national security priority IMO.
106
posted on
07/04/2009 2:22:13 PM PDT
by
randomhero97
("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
To: Mr. Jazzy
That is the one fact that makes his ideas in this area untenable.
He is right, by the strategic standards present in the age of sail...
107
posted on
07/04/2009 2:51:11 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: Deb
They do bring out an interesting sort.
I agree with them in many ways, but reality has it's own demands...
For instance when we get a fence built all the way around the nation (I guess screw Alaska and Hawaii) that stops any one getting in (and still lets me go deep sea fishing) as well as stop incoming missiles 100% then I am all for Paul's ideas.
As long as everyone in the USA can spend enough to make up for our lost international sales as to keep manufacturing going (shocking, but we do sell things overseas)...
108
posted on
07/04/2009 3:07:10 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: Deb
Exactly. Little do folks realize how much help the Saudis have been in all of this, as well as before.
The have risked the stability of their country to help us.
109
posted on
07/04/2009 3:10:42 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: usmcobra
You are the one claiming we fought them here, not I.
I say we didn’t do the “fight them over here” option.
110
posted on
07/04/2009 3:27:33 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Gondring
Please point out where I said we fought them over here prior to 911 or apologise for being a cretin.
Your choice.....
111
posted on
07/04/2009 5:17:17 PM PDT
by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: usmcobra
112
posted on
07/04/2009 6:06:08 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Gondring; usmcobra
"We tried fighting them over here, it ended badly on September 11, 2001." So you're one of those "truthers" who believes that Desert Shield/Desert Storm were created on a Hollywood soundstage? I didn't get that from usmcobra's remark. In fact, as a standalone (without going back to reread his entire post) I'm inclined to agree with him. We (collectively; the government) treated terrorism on our territory (including embassies and vessels) as a law enforcement problem, to be dealt with on our soil and in our courts. Bad idea, as 9/11 showed us-- yes, that policy ended badly.
On the other hand, DS/DS was against a nation's army, not a band of terrorists, fought on their territory (and the territory they had invaded and annexed).
113
posted on
07/04/2009 6:55:19 PM PDT
by
ExGeeEye
(Keep your powder dry, and your iron hidden.)
To: ExGeeEye; usmcobra
It might be a nice feeling to separate the two into different classifications, but that doesn’t mean everyone in the world is going to.
Now, usmcobra can pretend the Wahhabists don’t exist, but that’s sticking his head in the sand—which is another part of what led to 9/11. The fact is, DS/DS was fought “pver there” and was what led OBL to make 9/11 the day it became...so we cannot claim that we were fighting just here.
114
posted on
07/04/2009 7:12:34 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Gondring
Where the hell do you get these insane allegations from?
First you claim that I am a truther, now you are claiming that I am pretending that Wahhabist don’t exist and say as well that I am claiming that we were just fighting here.
Apologise now or my next post will be to have your disgusting and still unproven accusations removed from this sight.
115
posted on
07/04/2009 7:42:03 PM PDT
by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: Gondring; usmcobra
They.
Are.
Separate.
And.
Distinct.
The inability of others to see reality does not indicate an error in reality.
116
posted on
07/05/2009 5:05:37 AM PDT
by
ExGeeEye
(Keep your powder dry, and your iron hidden.)
To: ExGeeEye; Gondring
Frankly I think this person is trying to discredit what I say by labelling me a truther, despite the fact truthers are in league and in sync with Code Pink, International Answer, and other left wing groups I have personally demonstrated against.
117
posted on
07/05/2009 8:51:01 AM PDT
by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: ejonesie22
Did you see Drudge today? The Saudis have said they will ignore Israeli planes that fly thru their air space to attack Iran. Incredible.
118
posted on
07/05/2009 1:01:43 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: Deb
Not surprising, indeed imminently logical.
The Saudis walk a tight rope between the modern world and the barbarity of fundamental Islam
Iran with nukes pushes down a wee bit TOO much on the balancing pole...
Of course they will have internal backlash, but that is what oil money is for...
119
posted on
07/05/2009 1:04:49 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: rabscuttle385
I would prefer to fight them over here rather than put up with what happens at the airport and everything associated with the Patriot Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, anything engaged in by the Dept. of Homeland Security, etc., etc.
120
posted on
07/06/2009 7:37:34 PM PDT
by
elkfersupper
(Member of the Original Defiant Class)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson