Posted on 06/15/2009 8:26:03 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Tough Love for California.
House Chamber, Washington, D.C.
June 11, 2009
M. Speaker: Gov. Schwarzenegger of my home state of California has called for the federal government to underwrite as much as $15 billion of Revenue Anticipation Notes that the state has to issue to avoid insolvency.
I think that would be a colossal mistake, and that such an act would not only dig the nation deeper into the hole it is in, but would actually make Californias fiscal condition worse.
Today, California faces a paradox: despite record levels of spending and borrowing, it can no longer produce a decent road system, educate its children, or lock up its prisoners.
Those who blame the recession for Californias budget crisis profoundly misunderstand the nature of that crisis. Even before Californias revenue began to shrink, the state government was running a chronic $10 billion deficit and piling up unprecedented debt.
The recession is merely the catalyst; the underlying cause is rampant mismanagement of the states resources. California spends $43,000 per year to house a prisoner while many states spend just half that. California spends over $11,000 per pupil, but only a fraction of that ever reaches the classroom. California has one of the most expensive welfare systems in the country and yet one of the worst records of moving people off welfare.
And thats never seemed to bother Californias governor and legislature.
They are like the shopkeeper who leased out too much space, ordered too much inventory, hired too many people and paid them too much. Every month the shopkeeper covers his shortfalls with borrowing and bookkeeping tricks.
Ultimately, hell reach a tipping point where anything he does makes his situation worse. Borrowing costs are eating him alive and hes running out of credit. Raising prices causes his sales to decline. And theres only so much discretionary spending he can cut.
Thats Californias predicament in a nutshell. Californias borrowing costs now exceed the budget of the entire University of California and the reason for the loan guarantee is that their credit is exhausted. They have just imposed the biggest tax increase by any state in American history and it has actually reduced their revenues and made their budget gap wider.
Although there are many obsolete, duplicative or low priority programs and expenditures that the state can and should abolish, there arent enough of them to come anywhere close to closing Californias deficit without directly impacting basic services.
Sadly, California has reached the terminal stage of a bureaucratic state, where government has become so large and so tangled that it can no longer perform even basic functions.
Simply stated, there is now no substitute for a fundamental restructuring of the states major service delivery systems and restoring the efficiencies that once produced a far higher level of service at far lower cost that what we see today.
Restoring that efficiency will require the governor and the legislature:
These are changes that cannot be implemented overnight and that will not begin producing results for some time.
This brings us to the fine point of the matter. What Churchill called historys terrible, chilling words are about to be pronounced on Californias failed leadership: too late.
A federal loan guarantee or bailout may be the only way to buy time for the restructuring of Californias bureaucracies to take effect, but the discussion remains academic until and unless the state actually adopts the replacement structures, unburdens its shrinking productive sector and presents a credible plan to redeem the states crushing debt and looming obligations.
Without these actions, federal intervention will only make Californias problems worse by postponing reform, continuing unsustainable spending and piling up still more debt.
In short, if California wont help itself, the federal government cannot and should not.
Oh well, at least there's 2010. :-)
ping!
One of the best in the nation out there, IMHO. During the CA Govenator campaign debate, he was the ONLY one who had ANY ideas. But people go for the flash and idol stardom. And people “don’t like his eyes” (they’re very pale blue). I read his speeches when I can. He is the one of only a literal handful of politicians who actually understands what the common person goes through on a day to day basis, like getting up on time, getting the kids off, pay the bills, get to work, get the laundry done, etc. I haven’t any other politician even talk of such things.
McClintock is the man that should have won instead of Schwarzenkennedy. He would have accomplished one “H” of a lot more in the right direction for Californian’s against the overwhelming odds in the Calif. Legislature than anybody else IMO.
Yes, I am calling the California Legislature a bunch of “odds”.
McClintock was instrumental in recalling Gray Davis. McClintock understood the financial problems of California probably better than anyone who has run for Governor since the days of Ronald Reagan. The GOP hacks were pushing for Arnold, of course. Faux-conservative Hugh Hewitt was one of the hacks pushing for Arnold over Tom McClintock.
PING!
McClintock Ping List.
Please freepmail me if you want on or off this list
Nope. Not a chance. He's running for reelection to Congress in 2010.
Tom McClintock is universally respected and pulls votes across the spectrum of Republicans, including both the mainstream and the libertarian wing. Tom McClintock would make a great governor and I personally think, a great POTUS.
I would have no hestitation voting for Tom McClintock for any office, including president.
I’ve been a fan of his since he was in the Assembly.
BTTT
As for our own pack of legislative crap weasels here in California? Perhaps a handful are worth keeping--the rest deserve, well, you know what I would like to do to the rest of them...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.