Ron Paul Glen Beck 11/18/07 You Tube videos

The Glen Beck show ^ | 12/18/07 | Glen Beck

[traviskicks]

The following are the segments of the hour long interview Ron Paul had with Glenn Beck:

1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pme20JHPkwk
2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Y4j4m90-XM
3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNjnvp5z6kM
4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGrlZTlD-Sc
5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF_92PpCyUs
6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnm1nPHdATQ
7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DD1qMXMOjfo
8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kze69_lmGmA

[traviskicks]

This was, IMHO, the best interview I have ever seen with any political candidate ever. An amazing articulation of conservatism and libertarian principles, which I cannot believe we are lucky enough to find stemming from a major candidate for president of the United States. I find it hard to believe even people opposed to Ron Paul's candidacy could come away not respecting and admiring Paul's beliefs after seeing this inteview.

[traviskicks]

A simply amazing interview, IMO.



Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.

[murphE]

Thanks for saving me some time!

[traviskicks]

ping

[incindiary]

There is also a complete video here.

And yes, it was a very good interview. As Paul said, Beck did a better job with the interview and giving him time to speak, than some other shows did... so thank you, Glen, for that.

I thought it was great that Paul stated he would pardon the border agents. And that he talked about our sovereignty and other important issues. These are all things that many Americans care about... and was said in the interview, Paul has struck a chord with people who are sick and tired of the same old politics as usual, and don't want to vote status quo.

[traviskicks]

Ah thanks for that link.

[Grunthor]

I was and remain opposed to Ron Pauls’ candidacy, but it was a good interview.

[rineaux]

Thanks for posting the videos.

Beck was better than most interviewers. He let Paul answer the questions that were asked.

Paul did well. Covered all the issues and answered the questions honestly. Refreshing for a politician. Stayed on message. Not everyone will agree with him, just like I do not, however, we can all enjoy some more honesty in Washington.

With the exception of trying to tie RP supporters of threatening his family, Beck was good.

If you don’t like Paul, it is now PC to blame him and his supporters for the failures of one’s failed money bomb, candidacy, political signs coming down, the skewed on lines polls, the car not starting, stubbing your toe and....

In the one hour, I hope he picked up some new voters who have been sitting on the fence throughout this process.

[incindiary]

I think he did. (pick up new voters)

I think more and more people have been waking up to what has been going on in this country, and don't want to keep voting in the status quo, whether it's D or R.

The fact that that group is growing will mean more support for Paul, because there is no other candidate who represents actual change and getting back to the constitution and restoring our liberties/rights.

[rineaux]

Earlier in the morning, because of a quote by Sinclair Lewis that Paul quoted, they tried make him sound anti christian. He is not. Like many others, he has a private relationship and does not need to profess it. I did think Beck came off a little kookie with all his conspiracy questions. LOL. I think he did. (pick up new voters) I do agree, and will be able to measure this by looking at the new donor graph the next few days. I bet it goes up as well.

[rineaux]

Incindiary, since we were writing about new donors, it appears in the last few days RP has got 28,351 new donors. Lets see if it goes up rather briskly in the next few days after his appearance on the MSM these last few days.

Thanks to Janetjanet998, I was able to see the daily new donors on his website:

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

Too funny, getting ready to send this and he picked up another new donor. LOL 28351

[ksen]

Thanks for posting these videos traviskicks.

[publiusF27]

Thanks for posting. I enjoyed the interview, but could have done without the “truther” questions.

The interview, or parts of it, are already all over youtube, which raises some interesting intellectual property rights issues.

[George W. Bush]

	Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday] • Podcast • Weekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 •
	Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave

An excellent interview for the archives.

We lost 'the tongue' yesterday from FR because of a somewhat heated retort on a thread. But we do have some new folks on our pinglist. And we have plenty of others who are coming out in support of Ron Paul on various threads though they aren't on the pinglist. The Troll Patrol actually recruits for us by their actions, as many of you have probably noticed. Too bad they've done so much to harm FR as a forum in the process, much as the open-border trolls did a few years back. In the time since we had the Ron Paul pinglist, only two FReepers have asked to leave the list, one because he only only RP-curious and decided to support someone else. So our pinglist is pretty healthy and so is Ron Paul's level of support at FR.

At any rate, I'd like to warn the pinglist to be cautious on these obvious trolling threads. In particular, those non-stories posted in Breaking News. Their purpose is to lure RP supporters into making a remark so that the Paul-haters can all hit Abuse on them and try to get them banned. We've seen this many times already. That appears to be the entire purpose of those threads since they are not real news stories anywhere else on the internet or in the media.

I'm saying this as an observation. There's no need to discuss it at length.

[mosquitobite]

I liked that Glenn asked about the truther movement and I like that he brought up the death threats. They are a small portion of Dr Paul’s support, and Glenn gave Dr Paul a clear opportunity to distance himself from those types of supporters. Very good for the overall campaign imho.

[ARridgerunner]

In particular, those non-stories posted in Breaking News.

It shouldn't be breaking news that Huckabee is malicious and devious. (Romney and the LDS might agree.)

RP was too kind.

Thanks for the warning.

[ARridgerunner]

Thanks for links.

[rineaux]

George, thanks for being the Paul Ping keeper. I agree, we need to maintain our stance without getting involved in the sandbox name callings that we see from some of the cut and paste crowds. Sorry to read we lost “the tongue”. Opie is still MIA, correct?

Incindiary, mosquitobite, Bastiat_Fan, at some time, ping GWB if you want to be pinged on RP threads.

Mosquitobite, yes, I do think Paul did great considering some of questions Beck asked him. As I posted earlier, Beck did come across as Kookie when telling the story about his family being threatened by RP supporters. He was fair in that he allowed RP to answer the questions and did not interrupt him. No matter what, campaigns, sport teams, etc always draw from a unique crowd. Every candidate has some interesting people. It’s only Pauls candidacy that is under the microscope because you can’t attack his message so you result to name calling. JMO.

Just can’t stand when an interviewer asks the question and gives them little to no time to respond. If you ask a question, let the person speak. Bill O’Reilly is a classic and so is Sean Hannity just to give an example.

Not only is RP gaining some support on FR, most importantly he is picking up new donors that will result in money and votes.

Thanks George for always keeping me informed. The name calling from the haters is what brought me to RP.

Have fun, Bastiat_Fan know what I am talking about, we are waiting on our refund check from Soros for donating to RP. LOL

[murphE]

Bill O’Reilly is a classic and so is Sean Hannity just to give an example.

Both of them are in love with the sound of their own voices. They even talk over people they like. I think they are more about self promotion than objective journalism.

[rineaux]

Both of them are in love with the sound of their own voices. They even talk over people they like. I think they are more about self promotion than objective journalism.

True, true, true. Always promoting themselves and the books they write. LOL Listen to the RP interview again and Beck pitches it at least a half a dozen times. Got to love entertainment and entertainers.