Posted on 11/25/2007 5:07:42 PM PST by traviskicks
It was one year ago this week that narcotics officers in Atlanta, Georgia broke into the home of 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston.
They had earlier arrested a man with a long rap sheet on drug charges. That man told the police officers that they'd find a large stash of cocaine in Johnston's home. When police forced their way into Johnston's home, she met them holding a rusty old revolver, fearing she was about to be robbed. The police opened fire, and killed her.
Shortly after the shooting, the police alleged that they had paid an informant to buy drugs from Ms. Johnston's home. They said she fired at them first, and wounded two officers. And they alleged they found marijuana in her home.
We now know that these were all lies. In fact, everything about the Kathryn Johnston murder was corrupt. The initial arrest of the ex-con came via trumped-up charges. The police then invented an informant for the search warrant, and lied about overseeing a drug buy from Johnston's home.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The “War on drugs(TM)” needs to go.
Agreed.
Even so, the damage done has creeped into every segment of society and every aspect of everyone's daily lives.
It's like un-ringing a bell. The damage simply cannot be undone.
"The world" wouldn't think her killing justified if she did deal drugs.
That is a dollars's worth of chemicals being translated into several thousand dollars worth of crime times the number of those idiots out there times 365, all through the magic of stupid laws.
No nation on Earth including ours can afford that. A rational drug policy would:
Do all of that, and all meaningful drug problems and 70% of urban crime would evaporate in two years. In fact you could do that and keep the present prison system intact. You could end the war on drugs and declare a war on fraud on the same day. Every druggie thrown out of prison would be one more prison cell available for a democrat.
Nonetheless that is just an ideal solution; you'd be better off legalizing it all than doing what we are.
Yup.
But hey its all worth it to make sure people don't have an effect on cogress's ability to regulate interstate commerce. Or worse yet someone getting a non government approved buzz on.
I could support that policy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.