I agree that Dr. Paul will not get the nomination. There are too many single issue voters who don’t like his position on Iraq.
It’s funny that so many people will not vote for Dr. Paul because they disagree with him on one issue while he is rock solid on every other conservative issue. But they want conservatives to vote for Rudy who is against us on almost every issue except Iraq.
As for the media, just watch what they do to Rudy or Mitt or Huckabee if one of them gets the nomination. That will be really bloody.
I’d be happy with any one of the three conservatives getting the nomination and happily work and vote for any one of them. I’d jump for joy if Hunter, Tancredo or Paul got the nomination, and I’d go back to working for the campaign and maxing out my contribution to their campaign. (Something I haven’t done in quite a while.)
I’m sick of liberal Republicans getting nominated and voting for the lesser of two evils.
If we were talking about the save the humpback albino blind paraplegic ghecko, I could sign on to the deficiencies of single issues voters. This is national defense we’re talking about. If I’m going to go after Bush for not protecting our borders, I’m for sure going after Paul another aspect of national security.
As for your other comments I agree. Rudy is unacceptable to me. Romney is as well. I’m not signing on to any more RINOs.
You and I can agree on Paul about 99% of the time, that’s still not enough when it comes to national security. And I’m sorry this is the case.
Ron has ‘some’ valid points regarding our operation in Iraq. Unfortunately he extrapolates a universal picture from those points that I can’t buy into.
I appreciate the comments.