The Paulbearer Nuttery Factor for this thread is
Berry
Posted on 07/25/2007 2:56:54 PM PDT by bnelson44
Does he … not know what Alex Jones’s radio show is about? Does he think it’s some sort of “local interest” program? He makes regular appearances on it; isn’t it about time someone clued the great man in?
Audio at link
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
When asked if he believes any of the conspiracy talk surrounding 9-11 he replies, Absolutely Not!
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=519_1185293237
He’s definitely NOT like me.
Lie down with dogs and get up with fleas.
Oh, but he IS. Rudy Giuliani and half the FReepers told me so.
Sheesh. The only true Constitutionalist on the horizon, and a certain group will stop at nothing to trash him and his supporters.
Counting down to being called a dope-smoking conspiracy theorist symp in five . . . four . . . three . . .
And I got a bridge...
I think Paul is a good but seriously mistaken man. I’ve had a feeling that he was attracting some real nutcases whether he wanted them or not. Unfortunately he alone attracted them.
He’s nutty as a squirrel turd...
No, he did NOT say that.
Being unsurprised IF something happens is quite a distance from being sure it WILL happen.
BS.....
“Republican presidential candidate, Rep. Ron Paul, said the country is in “great danger” of the U.S. government staging a terrorist attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation, as the war in Iraq continues to deteriorate.”
From the posted link:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0707/Ron_Paul_warns_of_staged_terror_attack.html
Your right,just having to defend this buffoon is shameful enough. When he apologizes for blaming the USA for 9-11 then we can talk
http://www.breitbart.tv/html/3013.html
Alex Jones asked him directly, “How much danger are we in of some new Gulf of Tonkin provocation” to which RP replied “I think we’re in greater danger of it”. The transcription is mine from the video.
While you are correct that he did not specifically warn us, his language was considerably stronger than him being ‘unsurprised’, as you put it. That he and CS are on the same page doesn’t help his case much.
Why do people believe in this hoax of a “constitutionalist”? His nose was in the trough for $400 million in earmarks last session, and then he voted against the entire budget as a show. The budget passed of course (400-2), and so did his pork. His excuse for his pork-fest (it was going to get spent anyway) doesn’t square with his “principled” votes on other matters.
It’s the same old tired “it’s OK for me, but not for thee” routine, like all the rest. He’s no different, he just puts on a show of acting different and voting no when he knows the bill in question will pass anyway.
It’s like a cult.
He was for the pork before he was against it.
“Does he … not know what Alex Jones’s radio show is about? Does he think it’s some sort of “local interest” program?”
Does he know that a large chunk of his support comes from the “truthers” and were he (hehehe) to be elected POTUS, they would instantly turn on him when he did not immediately have W put up against a wall?
I agree with your assessment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.