[JTN]

FReepers siding with The New York Times against a constitutionalist Republican. This should be good.

[traderrob6]

Ron Paul is the Lyndon LaRouche of the right.

[RegulatorCountry]

FReepers siding with The New York Times against a constitutionalist Republican. This should be good.

It is an eye opener, isn't it?

[lormand]

"FReepers siding with The New York Times against a constitutionalist Republican."

Nice try at diversion, but that sophmoric trick works only on forums for idiots.

You can't ignore the gigantic elephant in the room.

Ignoring the fact that Ron Paul is a tool for 911 conspiracy kooks, and himself aligning with Rosie O'Donald and Cindy Sheehan should be highly suspect of any member of Freerepublic.

[Puddleglum]

FReepers siding with The New York Times against a constitutionalist Republican. This should be good.

LOL - indded! One of the signs of the end times, I think (along with dogs and cats living in sin).

[Rodney King]

FReepers siding with The New York Times against a constitutionalist Republican. This should be good.

He questioned the Iraq war... the holy grail of the neo-con movement (and by neo-con, I mean all those former liberals who have joined the GOP and FR since it became clear thet the GOP was going to be the majority).

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

FReepers siding with The New York Times against a constitutionalist Republican.

That's nothing. FReepers sided with the UN just because Paul didn't support another worthless non-biding resolution against Iran. I mean, the U.N. They were probably wearing the light blue berets too ROFL

[traviskicks]

lol