“Let’s do the math.
Which one weighs more?
A) Ron Paul’s own words?
B) an article written by someone else?
I have a degree in Engineering, but I think this is 4th grade logic math.”
Seems like the math is OK, but the logic is lacking. I too have engineering degrees, but you lost me. What you posted and what was in the NR both included Paul’s own words. Can you please explain to me what it is that Paul said that is not true?
I keep seeing lots of references to Paul being nuts or stupid, or enemy of America, but I don’t see any quotes that seems to indicate lies or errors. I’m still trying to find out why any pol that wants to use the Constitution again is beyond the pale of Freeper thinking.
I notice, some of the “haters” are supporting him. They have to support some one. Maybe they wouldn’t be haters if the US Constitution was being used for governance. That they might post his (Paul’s) articles on their web site seems to bring hate from freepers. I’m not sure who those sites are, but I am very curious why an article by Paul, warning folks we’re about to be taxed by the UN is an object of scorn by anybody who claims to be a conservative. Can you please do that math for me?
The communists always support the democraps, but that doesn’t make them bad. (Well, maybe that’s a bad example). Point is, that some group you may dislike, hate, feel disdain for, are also voters. You may not like them, but I’d still rather have them vote for Paul than say, Hitlery Klinton, or for that matter, the other democrap, Rudy G.
What about Ron Paul scares freepers? -Glenn
How can any decent human being who also happens to be a member of Freerepublic NOT see the insanity of propagating kook conspiracies?
When I find that I must repeat myself to yet another Paulistinian who comes along, I can still never understand just how bizarre this world can be.
It is not exclusive to sane or a Freeper. One can be both.