[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

First, I guess I don't know what 150 page thread you mean.

This one, right here. The one to which you were presumably referring, when you posted "I followed your link" in response to it. (You could not conceivably have been referring to any other link, as that's the only one I provided you. Obviously.)

I followed the link to the magazine; I looked at what I thought were the parts most likely to harbor wacky view - ie the editorials and some of the other headings.

I specifically pointed you towards a thread filled with his ardent, die-hard supporters -- and the comments supplied thereupon by same -- not "the editorials and some of the other headings." Politely averting one's gaze from the loathsomeness on display is scarcely the same thing as responding to it. And I am sorry you are trapped in Seattle.

Don't be. I'm establishing a beachhead.

[Puddleglum]

I followed the initial link from the guy who posted the wikipedia excerpt. So I am not being willfully ignorant of your link.

[George W. Bush]

If you guys are going to post a link to a site like that, I wish you’d label it as a warning. Those kind of sites are on FBI watchlists and I don’t like to click into such sites. Thanks.

[Puddleglum]

Okay, I see your link and I am not clicking a link to that site, thanks. Are there RP articles there? Same burden of proof I outlines before still applies.

I think we were in cross-post mode, and if I responded to the wrong post or poster, I apologize. I get to typing fast and do not do it that well.