I followed the initial link from the guy who posted the wikipedia excerpt. So I am not being willfully ignorant of your link.
Huh. Doesn't explain the "editorials" and whatnot you mentioned seeing there (Wiki articles don't have "editorials" and suchlike accompanying)... but: let it go, either way.
There is no longer any uncertainty on your part, I take it, as to which specific link is under discussion in this sub-thread. You will need to familiarize yourself with at least a statistically significant portion of same, in order to converse knowledgeably on said topic from this point forward.
The posters upon said thread (and they are numerous) are all extremely vocal and upfront as to what it is they happen to like and admire most about Ron Paul... and it is not, demonstrably, his position on fiat currency, say. What do you make of it all, then?