Replies

Christians can debate, stand up for their beliefs, and fight when necessary. Those with 'agendas' will always look for something that allows them to say 'what kind of Christian are you'? Many times, not always, but many times they are vocal Christ deniers themselves and have little credibility to be a judge or analyst of Christian beliefs or values.

Guess what - people that you don't consider to be Christians (that is, anyone whose faith or lack thereof doesn't follow in rigid lockstep with yours) can stand up and fight for their beliefs when necessary as well, and you just can't stand that, can you?

You whine and carry on about all the abuse the people you boast about having gotten banned heaped on you and your kind, but you don't mention the fact that you and/or your fellow "Christians" dished it right back out in spades. And what did these people you're so proud of having run off do? Among other things -

They objected to being considered not Christians because they were Catholics or Mormons.
They objected to your belief that anyone who is not a Christian cannot be a proper American citizen, and that they should either "get right with God" or get the hell out.
They objected to being called called communists, abortionists, eugenicists, Nazis, traitors, and much, much worse, because you insist on completely dismantling all science and science education in this country and sending us back to the Dark Ages, just like the Wahabbists.
They objected to your attitude that the power of the state should be used to enforce your idea of what the rest of us should read or watch, who we should choose as friends, what we should say, how we should dress and behave, what we should believe. At least the liberals freely admit they want to completely control our lives.

By the way, I'm not banned here (yet), I post at DC, and I have donated money in the past to Free Republic. If you go to the donor list, you'll see my name there. Radio Astronomer has been banned from here, he admins at DC, and his name is on the Free Republic donor list as well. So your comment about how no one who was banned from here ever gave money to Jim is just another one of your lies. But it's in the service of the Lord, so it's all good, right?

Yeah, Jim makes the rules, and if he wants to enforce them on only one side that's his right. And you can, and I'm sure you will, try and have me banned for standing up to your bullying tactics. You'll probably succeed, too.

But that's all you can do to me.

It's a great big internet out there, and I'll go on just fine at DC.

You have your rights, and I have my right to say what I want somewhere else and fight with everything I have to ensure that authoritarians like you never gain any real power.

And you just can't stand that.

Not one of your bullet points in your diatribe applies to me. I challenge you to find my quotes that support those statements.

In addition to that, you stated:

"So your comment about how no one who was banned from here ever gave money to Jim is just another one of your lies."

I said no such thing. What I said was:

"A list of the banned DC'ers was checked on a FReepathon thread and conclusively, not one was a monthly or dollar-a-day donor. "

My statement is factually correct, and verifiable. Your statement, on the other hand, is your own interpretation of what I said. I never said it. But, even though I never said it, you call me a liar for something I did not say, which can be readily verified right here on this thread.

I don't mind disagreements, but your comments are invalid and rage filled, with no valid relevance to me or my posts.

Sorry to disappoint you. I have no desire to see you banned, but you are doing a good job of drawing attention to your desire all by yourself.