Join Ron Paul supporters for 6/3 pres debate NH

RonPaulHQ.com ^ | ME

[Dada Orwell]

Inivte for FR folks: Ron Paul supporters from all over the Northeast will be out in force outside and inside the June 5 presidential debate in Manchester, NH. If you live anywhere near NH, we invite you to link up with us. We'll have lots of signs.

Details:

www.RonPaulHQ.com

[The_Eaglet]

ping?

Thank you. I wish I could be there.

[The_Eaglet]

Shouldn't that be 6/5 ?

[billbears]

"Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,' I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal," Paul said.

Paul also wrote that although "we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers."

Course you know both of those aren't quotes.And you know Dr. Paul refuted them. But when you don't have an argument against limited government conservatism, slurs are about all that's left right?

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Shouldn’t Paul have been at the debate last night?

Romney was there though, but later said he wasn't.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

I don't know why you're spamming FR with that stupid Osama picture. Paul doesn't support the Islamofascists.

[from occupied ga]

I’d rather die than rally in support of that cheese eating surrender monkey.

Wow what an impressively intellectual response to RP's position. (Just kidding - it's not impressive at all)

[browardchad]

All initiation of force is a violation of someone else's rights, whether initiated by an individual or the state, for the benefit of an individual or group of individuals, even if it's supposed to be for the benefit of another individual or group of individuals.

Paul/Kucinick in '08!

[NeoCaveman]

I don't know, Bush never was youtubed giving them aid and comfort like this.

[BigTom85]

Shouldn’t Paul have been at the debate last night?

No.. but its hard to tell the difference between Rudy, McCain, Romney, Hillary, Obama, and Edwards. They are all big government bureaucrats. They are all power hungry. Most of their stances on the major issues are liberal.

[BigTom85]

I don't know why you're spamming FR with that stupid Osama picture. Paul doesn't support the Islamofascists.

The Bush-bots will never understand. Paul wants to debate real issues. He wants to preserve our culture. He wants the US to leave the UN. He wants to protect the 2nd amendment. He wants to talk about how we can save the constitution. Notice he is the only one that mentions the US constitution numerous times? The others just talk about what new governemnt programs they want to fund. I almost choked when Rudy said he wants to cut the federal budget 50% at the last debate!

The choice is easy.. Ron Paul, Hunter, and Tancredo are the 3 best candidates (in that order).

[Red in Blue PA]

Ron Paul- The President to vote for assuming 9/11 never happened.

[DreamsofPolycarp]

You are a lying sack of ....., wait. That would likely get me banned to finish that sentence.

Those are NOT quotes that can correctly be attributed to Ron Paul.

The post is lying, duplicitous, dishonest, deceitful, equivocating, mendacious, untruthful, equivocating, slanderous and just plain evil. You can draw your own conclusions about the poster from the post, I guess.

Please let me know who you support and send me a picture, so I can post your pic with an example of the lying scum who supports the particular candidate....., you know, the way that idiot posted the vid of a guy with a Ron Paul sign walking with the "truthers" crowd.

[Chi-townChief]

Hunter gets it - Paul doesn’t.

[P-40]

Hunter gets it - Paul doesn’t.

Odd. I listened to a rather great interview with Hunter on C-Span and he discussed basically the same things Paul does.

[mnehring]

Actually, only the first two are in dispute (which can be confirmed by the Google search you mentioned).. They came directly from a Ron Paul newsletter attributed to him, but after people raised hell about them, he said someone else wrote them.. The rest, however are easily confirmed and I’m working on a list of sources now.. Some even have audio :->

[Austin Willard Wright]

Ron Paul ping.

[DreamsofPolycarp]

Actually, the fired staffer admitted that they were his words, and Ron Paul never said them. Can you help us with the definition of “M-E-N-D-A-C-I-O-U-S” or are you just content to be a walking example?

[roses of sharon]

OBL must be thrilled at all the US pols and their supporters spouting his propaganda for him.

[Ohioan]

Come to the circus and cheer for the geek!

Wow! What a powerful argument against the one man who dares to uphold the principles of the Founding Fathers! What you cannot debate, you insult!

To understand where Ron Paul is coming from, you need to read the Constitution, Washington's Farewell Address, and Jefferson addresses to Congress. Throw in the Federalist Papers, and you might really begin to understand.

[DreamsofPolycarp]

To understand where Ron Paul is coming from, you need to read the Constitution, Washington's Farewell Address, and Jefferson addresses to Congress. Throw in the Federalist Papers, and you might really begin to understand.

Duh, are those like "historical" writings and stuff? Don't bother me with all that OLD junk!!!! Don't you know we are at WAR????!!!!

Times have CHANGED! Get with the program!