[presidio9]

So what you’re saying is that your brand of “conservatism” is anti personal freedom and anti Constitution? You are one sick puppy, me boyo. One sick puppy. But it IS good to know where you stand on the subject. Freedom isn’t conservative. The Constitution which set up this nation isn’t conservative. Who’da thunk it?

How did you get all that from the one sentence I posted. Perhaps you're the one with "issues."

[dcwusmc]

Well, if your brand of "conservativism" is diametrically opposed to (l)ibertarianism and (l)ibertarianism is about personal liberty and the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, it's obvious, isn't it? You are anti-freedom and anti-Constitution. Simple. And the words just flowed right out of your fingertips, didn't they? "Conservativism and Libertarianism are diametrically opposed. This article doesn’t belong on this website. Neither do you." Who'da thunk it???

So if it's not personal freedom and the Constitution you're wanting to conserve, WHAT IS IT you want conserved? The new, modern socialist or fascist state? A different brand of authoritarianism? What?