Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REQUIEM MASS FOR THE PONTIFICAL SOLDIERS WHO DIED IN THE DEFENSE OF ROME
The Foundation for Catholic Reform ^ | September 20, 2003 | Fr. Ignacio Barreiro

Posted on 10/09/2003 8:20:51 PM PDT by Land of the Irish

HOMILY DELIVERED AT A REQUIEM MASS FOR THE PONTIFICAL SOLDIERS WHO 
DIED ON THE 20TH OF SEPTEMBER, 1870, IN THE DEFENSE OF ROME
By Fr. Ignacio Barreiro

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit

On this sad anniversary, we offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass on behalf of the souls of the Pontifical Soldiers who perished in the defense of Rome and Christian Europe and also for the souls of the enemy soldiers who died in that battle. Indeed it is a Christian virtue to pray for all the deceased, so in the same way as Blessed Pius IX ordered the faithful after the battle of Mentana to pray for the souls of their enemies who had died, we also do so today.

We cannot honor the memory of so many good men who gave up their lives in defense of the ideal of Christian society without at the same time upholding those same ideals. A basic sense of coherence leads us to proclaim a Christian view of society based on the Social Kingship of Christ. A society that rejects Christ will never find happiness because He is the only rock on which we can build society.

The twentieth century, in many respects one of the most horrible centuries in human history, came to an end with the apparent victory of liberalism. This ideology has apparently defeated other ideologies, which in a direct or indirect way also came down from the Enlightenment, such as totalitarian Marxism or an extreme form of nationalism that has broken its roots with the healthy traditions of the people. Liberalism has a view of man and society that is closed to the truth of God and man because it is agnostic toward transcendental values. Adherents of this ideology are mostly concerned with the promotion of mere instrumental values for the establishment of what they consider to be a more open society. Such a society in real terms brings about a self-destructive libertarianism, leading men to become slaves of their most base passions and at the same time making them dependent on those few who dominate consumer society for their own benefit. This libertarianism destroys marriage through divorce, grants legal protection to homosexual unions, and brings about collective suicide through abortion, euthanasia, and contraception. (God considers the sin of contraception so serious that He punished with death the first man in the Bible who is described as having committed it.)

We all know that behind a facade of civility, the liberals actively seek the destruction of the Catholic Faith and of the few remaining traditional values. On top of the direct and explicit aggression against traditional values, we are suffering the tragedy, as was recently underlined by the Holy Father John Paul II, that "European culture gives the impression of a silent apostasy by a man who, having too many material possessions, lives as if God did not exist." This silent apostasy has many causes: from a liberal and secularist propaganda that has been active for more than two centuries, to pastoral shortcomings within the Church, which has not been able or has not known how to transmit the faith, as Cardinal Ratzinger has recently enumerated.

Confronted by this tragic situation, we have to promote a society that is based on the values that come from the natural law and Christian revelation as it has been taught through the centuries by the Magisterium of the Church, a model of society that became real and life-giving under great Christian emperors and kings of the past. It is a type of society that even today, after several dark centuries, could be reestablished if the men of our time were to return to the only faith that saves. A Christian society maintains always the same substance and the same grounding principles, but at the same time it can admit of differences, taking into account the different particular traditions of the nations and the changing circumstances of time and place. It would be utopian to try to copy in a literal way the models of the past, but it is not utopian to do everything that we can to reestablish the same permanent grounding principles that previously gave us a society based upon the Social Kingship of Christ.

Now we are witnessing another step in the process of the destruction of the traditional values of Europe with the approval of the "Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe." Reading the preamble, it is easy to see how this document is a direct descendent of the revolutionary Enlightenment that has brought about so many tragedies in Europe as well as in countries all over the world.

From its very first paragraph, the preamble begins with a brash lie when it states that the inhabitants of Europe "have gradually developed the values underlying humanism: equality of person, freedom, respect for reason." First, we should state that values are never developed by men, but are gifts from God that man receives partially through natural revelation and fully through the knowledge that derives from supernatural revelation. So to say that man is a creator of values is a lie that in the end constitutes a blasphemy against God. Second, we should remember that it is not by accident that these ideas are regrettably all too similar to the counter values that can be found in the proclamations of the French Revolution. There is no doubt that all men are equal by essence, but it is also obvious to everyone that men are different between themselves in so many ways that to speak of equality without speaking about those great differences leads to a great injustice that damages the common good. Liberty for the drafters of this document means a total autonomy of man to do whatever he wants to do, which in the end leads to a lawless and antisocial lifestyle. Instead, liberty is for us the moral capacity that man possesses to choose the good. What do they mean when they speak about respect for reason? They speak of an autonomous and self-sufficient reason. To be truly rational, human thinking has to be grounded in reality and, in particular, grounded in the truth, which is God.

Without hiding their satisfaction, the drafters of this document state that "Europe intends to continue along the path of civilization, progress and prosperity." Then they provide us with a comprehensive list of all sorts of nice things that they are doing and conclude this list with the promise of "solidarity throughout the world". A person would have to be truly blindfolded to consider that this continent, which has given birth to the most horrible ideologies, which in their own turn have caused the most horrendous massacres in these last centuries, is moving along the path of civilization. (A partial listing of the horrors that have taken place across Europe in recent centuries would take us from the terror of the French Revolution, to the Soviet Gulag, to the martyrdom of thousands of Catholics in 1930's Spain.) These horrible crimes regrettably are not something from the past, but rather they continue in our own day as we now witness millions of human beings killed in the wombs of their mothers and thousands of old and sick persons that are murdered because contemporary society, which has "progressed" so much in its civilization, is too selfish to take care of them. They talk to us of progress, one of the Enlightenment myths, and instead we see regress and decadence all over. How can we talk of progress on a continent where the demographic winter has arrived with a yearly population decrease? At the same time that this happens, the identity of Europe is at risk by an illegal and uncontrolled immigration from non-Christian nations. How can they speak of prosperity when we find a high rate of unemployment and when so many workers earn miserable salaries with which they cannot support their families? How can we talk of solidarity throughout the world when the common agricultural policy of Europe, besides causing long-term damage to European farmers and making them dependent on a band of bureaucrats, seriously damages the economy of so many poor countries as may be seen in the recent conference of the WTO at Cancun? (This is said without in any way giving legitimacy to these international organizations that are not inspired by traditional Christian values.)

As one can see, this preamble is an accumulation of lies because the true unity of Europe will never be grounded in false ideologies, but only in the Eternal Truth, the same truth that comes from God and that for centuries has become incarnated and taken root on this continent. This is the faith that has been lived by the different Christian nations that have built Christian Europe with their sweat and blood. For that reason we have to be deeply aware that either Europe remains Christian or it is no longer going to be Europe. A Catholicism that came alive in the institutions of so many European nations, a totalitarian and Jacobin centralism is today trying to destroy. This attack on the spiritual, cultural, and historic identity of European nations has been constantly denounced by the Holy Father John Paul II. For these reasons we strongly object to a draft of the European Constitution which lacks all references to God and to the Christian roots of our continent.

We hope that Europe, the history of which cannot be separated from Christian civilization, will return to its roots in Christ. Union with Christ is the only reality that would bring about the unity of Europe.

To conclude our prayer, we seek the intercession of the Immaculate Virgin Mary and of Blessed Pius IX, asking their assistance first and foremost for the souls of the deceased Pontifical

Soldiers and of their enemies, and secondly, we also pray that we remain faithful in our battle for the establishment of the Social Kingship of Christ in a Christian Europe.

This homily was delivered by Father Ignacio Barreiro on September 20, 2003, at the Church of Corpus Domini in Rome. A native of Uruguay, Fr. Barreiro was ordained in the Archdiocese of New York in 1987 and is currently Director of the Rome Office of Human Life International.

 

Home l Contact l Site Map l Donate l Books l Mailing List
Copyright 2001-2003 The Foundation for Catholic Reform, P.O. Box 2286, Fort Collins, CO 80522


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Hermann the Cherusker
You're trying to pick a fight where there isn't one, and putting words in my mouth.

Pope Innocent III was not a dictator who could force everyone to do as he pleased, but it was during his reign that virtually every Christian leader recognized their authority as coming from the Church and Vicar of Christ.

"Wasn't the period AD 400-650 a lot better
for Christians in Africa, Egypt, Syria,
Persia, Spain, etc. than post Islam in the Middle Ages?
Or does the only part of Christendom that counts
consist fo France, Italy, and Germany?"

When did I ever say anything relating to that? Of course it is better to be under Christian than Muslim rule, but that has nothing to do with Christendom, they were a conquered people. -I don't see the connection.

"Why do you insist on seeing the Most Christian
Emperors as all-powerful tyrants and dictators?"

Show me where I ever said anything of the kind! I insist on nothing of the sort! I am an old-fashioned Catholic monarchist and would support a Christian emperor any day of the week and twice on Sunday. I simply do not hold *any* temporal ruler to be above the authority of the Pope.

"Rome was the source of law, order, and freedom,
not the German barbarians."

True enough, but that sounds a little elitist. The Germans adopted Roman culture and were capable of becoming just as refined and civilized over time as anyone.

"Rome had a system of free cities and provincial rule in a united land at peace long before the medieval royals figured out how to mimic this system and curb the depredations of their nobles."

By the time Rome became Christian it was not very well united at all. The Church tried to restore this system as soon as it was able, but the very fact that Rome collapsed meant that it had to take some time before any relative peace could be reestablished.

I simply prefer the de-centralized system of the Holy Roman Empire, wherein the Emperor had authority over defense and foreign relations, leaving other matters up to the local authorities and where the Church was recognized as being paramount in all matters, temporal and spiritual. The Roman and Byzantine rulers, as much as I admire many of them, simply had a little too much arbitrary power for me to be 100% comfortable with.
41 posted on 12/03/2003 11:30:55 AM PST by Guelph4ever (“Tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et tibi dabo claves regni coelorum”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MWS
Out of curiosity, how many Catholic Monarchists do we have on this site?

2 and one flat earth society member.

42 posted on 12/03/2003 11:38:32 AM PST by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Guelph4ever
Pope Innocent III was not a dictator who could force everyone to do as he pleased, but it was during his reign that virtually every Christian leader recognized their authority as coming from the Church and Vicar of Christ.

An absolutely bizzarre theory too. Authority comes from God. Romans 13, St. John 19, etc.

Show me where I ever said anything of the kind! I insist on nothing of the sort! I am an old-fashioned Catholic monarchist and would support a Christian emperor any day of the week and twice on Sunday. I simply do not hold *any* temporal ruler to be above the authority of the Pope.

Neither did the Most Christian Emperors. See the Code of Justinian.

True enough, but that sounds a little elitist. The Germans adopted Roman culture and were capable of becoming just as refined and civilized over time as anyone.

Yes, over time, provided they did not pervert the culture in the interim. The later affinity of my Anglo-Tuetono-Scandanavian brethren for Protestantism suggests this did not happen in the main.

By the time Rome became Christian it was not very well united at all. The Church tried to restore this system as soon as it was able, but the very fact that Rome collapsed meant that it had to take some time before any relative peace could be reestablished.

Not very well united? Romans remained united for centuries after the German conquest. The Franks were dealing with Roman revolts in the 8th century.

So there is not doubt about the identity of the revolutionaries in Gaul, we quote a contemporary Frankish chronicler who reports that in 742, the year of Charlemagne's birth, the Gascons rose in revolt under the leadership of Chunoald, the duke of Aquitaine and son of Eudo, mentioned above. Charlemagne's father and uncle "united their forces and crossed the Loire at the city of Orleans. Overwhelming the Romans, they made for Bourges." [10 Fredegarii, Chronica Continuationes 25.] Since Chunoald is here described as a beaten Roman, this means that his father Eudo was also a Roman, and not a Frank, as claimed by some. (FRANKS, ROMANS, FEUDALISM, AND DOCTRINE, Fr. John Romanides)

The Romans had no doubt who their rulers were (Emperor and Pope), and who they were not (the Franks).

And if unity was important, that is certainly something Europe lacked until Napoleon.

I simply prefer the de-centralized system of the Holy Roman Empire, wherein the Emperor had authority over defense and foreign relations, leaving other matters up to the local authorities and where the Church was recognized as being paramount in all matters, temporal and spiritual. The Roman and Byzantine rulers, as much as I admire many of them, simply had a little too much arbitrary power for me to be 100% comfortable with.

There is no such thing as a Byzantine Emperor or Empire. Its a figment of your imagination. The last Roman Emperor and the Roman Empire itself died on the field of battle in 1453 against the Turks at Constantinople New Rome.

43 posted on 12/03/2003 12:16:13 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
okay: you win everything

happy?

sheeesh
44 posted on 12/03/2003 1:30:21 PM PST by Guelph4ever (“Tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et tibi dabo claves regni coelorum”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck; B-Chan; Guelph4ever; Goetz_von_Berlichingen; Land of the Irish; MWS
2 and one flat earth society member.

Haha. But how do you come up with only 2? I realize I don't count since I'm not Catholic. But the five other FReepers listed above have all identified themselves as Catholic monarchists. Too bad "Zviadist" got banned, or we'd have six. There are probably others as well I've momentarily forgotten.

45 posted on 12/03/2003 6:27:48 PM PST by royalcello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Guelph4ever
Pope Innocent III action figures available here.

Pope Innocent III Action Figure

Introduce this Pope Innocent III Action Figure to your other figures and watch the spiritual sparks fly! Armed with his formidable power of excommunication and an intimidating scroll inscribed with Latin text, this 6" tall, hard plastic model of the 176th Pope will soon have all your other action figures lining up for confession. Read the back of the illustrated blistercard and you'll find that Pope Innocent III was a good guy in all respects. He was a patron of the arts, cared about orphans, built a hospital and reunified the Papal States! Comes with removable fancy Pope hat.

I thought it was cool.

46 posted on 12/03/2003 7:38:06 PM PST by NeoCaveman (all the terrorists are supporting Kucinich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
:-D Wow, that has to be the coolest toy I have ever seen! Thanks alot, I'll absolutely have to get one of those.

"Christ has left to Peter the government, not only of the Church, but of the whole world."
--that ought to hack plenty of people off. ;-)
47 posted on 12/03/2003 9:52:47 PM PST by Guelph4ever (“Tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et tibi dabo claves regni coelorum”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
Gosh, the way you put it, you make it sound as if being a Flat Earth Society member is a BAD thing... :-\
48 posted on 12/04/2003 5:51:21 PM PST by MWS (Errare humanum est, in errore perservare stultum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MWS
Let me say up front that I am a convert to the Roman Catholic Church, however, my Grandfather is a big-time Protestant fundamentalist who believes very much in taking every little bit of the Bible absolutely at face value. He never joined any club, but he still believes the world is flat and that the sun revolves around the earth (all because Joshua ordered the sun rather than the earth to stand still). However, he believes the world is circular, whereas his mother, my late great-grandma, believed the earth was flat and square because of the verses which talk about the earth having four corners.

Of course, Grandpa also thinks the moon landing was a propaganda film staged by the US government. As far as he's concerned mankind never has and never will go to space (how he explains his satellite tv I don't know).

I don't see eye-to-eye with Gramps on these issues, but, what can I say? He's the Pater Familias after all...

Oh, and let it be known: I have already ordered my Pope Innocent III action figure. Too cool ;-)
49 posted on 12/04/2003 10:07:30 PM PST by Guelph4ever (“Tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et tibi dabo claves regni coelorum”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Guelph4ever
I too am a convert from a predominantly Protestant family (although the members of my family aren't particularly well read in Scripture, which makes for some interesting discussions on occasion), so I know exactly how that can be.

Oh, and let it be known: I have already ordered my Pope Innocent III action figure. Too cool ;-)

Oh yeah? That's interesting. I actually have the Pope Alexander VI action figure. It was on discount because Ceasar and Lucrezia Borgia were included for free... (they gotta pay you to take those two!)

50 posted on 12/05/2003 7:19:45 AM PST by MWS (Errare humanum est, in errore perservare stultum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: anyone
Just bumping this thread. By the way, add one more monarchist (and traditionalist) to the count.
51 posted on 05/12/2004 8:01:03 PM PDT by Blessed Charlemagne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson