Skip to comments.
Russian chapel razed after gay 'marriage'
The Washington Times ^
| Oct 9, 2003
| LONDON DAILY TELEGRAPH
Posted on 10/09/2003 6:38:30 AM PDT by FormerLib
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:09:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
MOSCOW
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Moral Issues; Orthodox Christian; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: orthodoxchristian
I'm glad the Russian Church has made sure there will be no question about how they view the abomination known as "same-sex marriage."
1
posted on
10/09/2003 6:38:31 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
To: All
DON'T MEAN TO BUG YOU.....
BUT CAN YOU HELP? PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic
LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO
CA 93794
Or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
It's on the Breaking News Sidebar
2
posted on
10/09/2003 6:40:15 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: FormerLib
While they're at it, perhaops they could tear down the "Cathedral of St John the Divine" for allowing masses in which the names of pagan gods were invoked. The building was already hit by lightning.
3
posted on
10/09/2003 9:24:23 AM PDT
by
bobjam
To: FormerLib; american colleen; sinkspur; livius; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp; narses; ...
The Chapel of the Vladimir Icon of the Mother of God was torn down apparently after local churchmen decided it had been defiled. The priest, the Rev. Vladimir Enert, was defrocked after the men said they paid him a $450 bribe to ignore a ban of same-sex "marriages." Priceless!
4
posted on
10/09/2003 10:12:25 AM PDT
by
NYer
(Pax et Bonum)
To: NYer
Shoulda tarred and feathered him too. That way he'd be both defrocked AND flocked.
5
posted on
10/09/2003 10:17:00 AM PDT
by
drstevej
To: NYer
Why can't our Church act swiftly and decisively like this?
Although, I wonder why they couldn't have reconsecrated the chapel. But I don't know how that works in the Eastern Churches.
BTW, anyone know whatever happened with that Texas church that had been used for pagan ceremonies?
6
posted on
10/09/2003 10:18:09 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
(<== Just Another 'Right-Wing Crazy')
To: NYer
Now that's the way to do it!
7
posted on
10/09/2003 10:29:31 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
(CHIRHO)
To: bobjam
I hadn't heard anything about the Cathedral of St John the Divine incident. Could you pass along a link? Thanks.
8
posted on
10/09/2003 12:28:24 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(The enemy is within!)
To: B Knotts
I suspect this is one of the cases where the laity and ordinary clergy simply did what was right without bothering to run the question up the the Patriarch (or even local bishop).
In Orthodoxy, since the Faith is known to be unchanging, there the potential for swift action when something obviously goes against the Faith, even though what is usually observed by the world is perpetual inaction (precisely because the faith once delivered to the saints doesn't change).
To: FormerLib
This seems a bit extreme. I believe there are rites of purification and reconsecration of a profaned church.
To: Unam Sanctam
As was mentioned in the article, the fact that the chapel was due to be razed in the future probably had an impact. Had this not been the case, then some sort of reconsecration would have taken place.
But I'm very glad that they didn't just shrug it off as meaningless.
11
posted on
10/09/2003 3:50:18 PM PDT
by
FormerLib
(The enemy is within!)
To: FormerLib
It is called "sending a message."
12
posted on
10/09/2003 4:55:11 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(CHIRHO)
To: B Knotts
"I wonder why they couldn't have reconsecrated the chapel?"
They couldn't lift the 50 gal. drums of holy oil that it would require.
13
posted on
10/09/2003 7:49:30 PM PDT
by
torqemada
("Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson