1 posted on
10/07/2003 3:10:44 PM PDT by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
2 posted on
10/07/2003 3:11:38 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter! You'll save at least one life, maybe two!)
To: All
SHOW YOUR PRIDE! SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
10/07/2003 3:13:20 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: sinkspur
IN the good old days, breaking a vow was considered wrong. Yes, he is still a good catholic since he went thru the forms of being released from vows, but nevertheless he did break his word.
As for Orthodox priests, they don't marry. Married men can become orthodox priests, but if you are ordained unmarried, you cannot marry. And all bishops are unmarried.
I have no problem in allowing the ordination of married men. This would be a good compromise. I do have problems in allowing priests to break vows and date and marry.
4 posted on
10/07/2003 3:59:35 PM PDT by
LadyDoc
(liberals only love politcially correct poor people.)
To: sinkspur
I'll have to get my wife to write a "My Hisband the Pope" article after the whit smoke ascends and the Fourth Secret of Fatima is unfolded.
7 posted on
10/07/2003 4:33:56 PM PDT by
drstevej
To: sinkspur
I agree that the bishops wasted money on the perverts and I have pity for the men who couldn't stick it out. But now they have the chance to live up to their new vocation. It is not that they don't have compensations that were denied to those priests who outlived their families and careers and ended up alone. Count your blessings.
8 posted on
10/07/2003 5:30:17 PM PDT by
RobbyS
(CHIRHO)
To: sinkspur
Feeling guilty about something?
9 posted on
10/07/2003 5:37:23 PM PDT by
Codie
To: sinkspur
Even if you move, remember that canon law prohibits some professions (and all roles during Masslike lector) to you, although bishops vary in their attention to that rule, so if you wantor haveto work in the church, you have to look hard for a bishop who will look at those rules for what they are. Which is nonsense. The disobedience is breath-taking. Or maybe its just the pride that is breath-taking.
26 posted on
10/07/2003 8:17:10 PM PDT by
NeoCaveman
(those rats keep slinging the mud)
To: sinkspur
Nobody forced anyone here to take vows.
I find it more than a little ironic that the folks in the SSPX who, other than following Vatican II are good catholics, draw your ire but these two, other than keeping their vows, draw your support.
I suppose it couldn't be anything as simple as the fact that the former are traditional and the latter are progressive (despite the lip service to being Orthodox).
The author seems to be painfully aware of everyone else's pride, yet woefully ignorant of her own. They have enough faith to keep up with ritual and prayer, but not enough to sacrifice their earthly desires for their eternal souls.
Sad.
49 posted on
10/08/2003 7:02:40 AM PDT by
TradicalRC
(While the wicked stand confounded, Call me, with thy saints surrounded. -The Boondock Saints)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson