I'm sorry, but that's not true. You rejected out of hand the criticism that was supplied by several posters at the time you first published the numbers. It's not my job to keep track of whatever you posted several months ago, but I recall that your data was extremely suspect, and there were several replies that pointed out gaping flaws, but you rejected them out of hand, without seriously considering the implications. It is no personal criticism to say that you are not a statistician, not many people are, but you should have made the effort to consider the criticisms that were offered.