Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: As you well know...
Well, even the sppx admit Pius X was NOT "successful."

Where did you get this from? He took a growing heresy and nipped it in the bud. This sounds like "successful" to me. And I'd like to see some documentation of what the SSPX believes about Pope Saint Pius X.

both issued Documents and JP II ( I do this ALL the time) is faulted for writing rules/encycicals and norms ect and not "acting" while Pope Pius X is excused for doing the same thing. Why didn't Pius X excomminicate these heritics insted of letting them remain in their positions to undermine the Faith?

You must have missed the rest of the story. Pius X did exactly that. He excommunicated the leaders of the modernist movement, like Loisy. As this article points out, he wouldn't even allow anyone tainted with the heresy from getting into a seminary in the first place. He did precisely all the things that Paul VI and JPII have not been doing.

Except when it comes to traditionalists, of course. Just take the way they have acted towards traditionalists and imagine it being done against heretics. There you would have Pope Pius X in a nutshell.

have just one question...is Venarri an idiot or are his readers idiots?

Some readers at least.

6 posted on 09/12/2003 7:54:25 AM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Maximilian
The arguements from the traditionalists I have read say he was not successful, that his actions only sent the modernists underground, that they continued in the seminaries and they spread their errors and that resulted in V2 ect.
7 posted on 09/12/2003 8:43:27 AM PDT by As you well know...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson